The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Disability Evaluation↗
Biomedical subjects
Kate M Dunn
Publications and source records attributed to Kate M Dunn.
Repeat assessment improves the prediction of prognosis in patients with low back pain in primary care.
Low back pain is considered to fluctuate over time, and related prognostic factors may behave similarly, therefore classification of prognosis may be affected by timing of assessment. We aimed to investigate the implications of timing of assessment of prognosis in low back pain. In a prospective cohort of primary care low back pain consulters aged 30-59 years, 359 returned questionnaires at baseline, one-month and one-year. The stability of selected prognostic indicators between baseline and one-month later was assessed, and relative risks for their association with outcome (individually and in combination) were calculated. Reported absence of most outcome indicators was stable between baseline and one-month. However, among people reporting presence of indicators at baseline, only around half still reported them a month later. There were no important differences between the prognostic strength of indicators measured at baseline or one-month. People reporting presence of indicators at either point had significantly higher risk of poor outcome than people not reporting the indicator at all. Presence of the indicators at both time points was associated with even higher risk; people with persistent high pain intensity had 15 times the risk of a poor outcome (relative risk 15.1; 95% confidence interval 6.7-33.8) compared with people not reporting high pain at either point. Combining information on prognostic indicators from two time points provides better classification of low back pain patients' eventual outcome than a single measurement alone. This increased accuracy in predicting prognosis is relevant to both clinical and research practice.
Adult↗
Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review.
BACKGROUND: It is believed that the prevalence of back pain decreases around the middle of the sixth decade. However, back pain is still among the most commonly reported symptoms in the elderly and osteoarthritis, disc degeneration, osteoporosis and spinal stenosis all increase with age. In light of this, it is difficult to understand why the prevalence of back pain would decrease with increasing age. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at summarising the scientific evidence on the trends of back pain prevalence with age. METHODS: Population-based studies reporting the prevalence of back pain, including people aged 65 years and over, were systematically retrieved from several bibliographic databases. These were read and assessed by two reviewers, and papers retained ('good quality studies') were aggregated according to specific criteria. RESULTS: Good quality studies showed a large heterogeneity as to their methods and prevalence figures. No specific patterns were detected by country nor outcome measure. However, most studies that considered severe forms of back pain found an increase of prevalence with increasing age. The curvilinear association between age and back pain prevalence that is widely mentioned in the literature was found only for benign and mixed problems. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence concerning the association of back pain prevalence with age is more sparse than currently believed and this association seems to be modified by the severity of the problem. This knowledge could have important public health implications, as the proportion of older people will increase considerably in the coming years in most industrialised societies.
Age Distribution↗
Course and prognosis of back pain in primary care: the epidemiological perspective.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adolescent↗
Characterizing the course of low back pain: a latent class analysis.
Understanding the course of back pain is important for clinicians and researchers, but analyses of longitudinal data from multiple time points are lacking. A prospective cohort study of consecutive back pain consulters from five general practices in the United Kingdom was carried out between 2001 and 2003 to identify groups defined by their pain pathways. Patients were sent monthly questionnaires for a year. Longitudinal latent class analysis was performed by using pain intensity scores for 342 consulters. Analysis yielded four clusters representing different pathways of back pain. Cluster 1 ("persistent mild"; n = 122) patients had stable, low levels of pain. Patients in cluster 2 ("recovering"; n = 104) started with mild pain, progressing quickly to no pain. Cluster 3 ("severe chronic"; n = 71) patients had permanently high pain. For patients in cluster 4 ("fluctuating"; n = 45), pain varied between mild and high levels. Distinctive patterns for each cluster were maintained throughout follow-up. Clusters showed statistically significant differences in disability, psychological status, and work absence (p < 0.001). This is the first time, to the authors' knowledge, that latent class analysis has been applied to longitudinal data on back pain patients. Identification of four distinct groups of patients improves understanding of the course of back pain and may provide a basis of classification for intervention.
Adult↗
The importance of symptom duration in determining prognosis.
Symptom duration is integral to clinical and epidemiological research on pain. It is widely used for sample selection and commonly assessed in clinical practice. However, there has been little specific investigation of the link between duration and outcome. This work aimed to examine the association of episode duration with symptoms and clinical course in primary care consulters with low back pain (LBP). In a cohort of general practice LBP consulters, 619 patients returned two or more questionnaires during a 12-month period. LBP episode duration at baseline consultation was defined by time since their last pain-free month. Associations of duration with pain, disability and psychological status at baseline were examined. Survival analysis was used to assess the association between episode duration and time taken for disability to improve by 30%. At baseline, increasing episode duration was associated with worse pain, disability and psychological status (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between people with more or less than 3 months of pain. People with 3 years' or more duration at baseline took significantly longer to improve than those with shorter duration (adjusted hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.95). In conclusion, memory of LBP episode duration is associated with pain, disability and psychological status, and is an independent predictor of time to improvement. There are important differences between people who recall more or less than 3 years' duration. Mechanisms for these associations are poorly understood, but this research suggests that duration itself is an important focus for research.
Adult↗
A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare methods commonly used to derive minimal important differences and recommend a rule for defining patients as clinically improved on the low back pain-specific Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). METHODS: 447 primary care low back pain consulters completed a questionnaire at consultation and 6 months. Patients were classified as having achieved an important change based on methods with the best theoretical qualities, that is, the standard error of measurement, reliability change index (RCI), and modified RCI (RC(indiv)), and using a 30% reduction in score from baseline. To assess clinical importance, improvements based on these methods were compared with improvements on other back pain-related measures. RESULTS: The percentage of patients rated as improved ranged from 14 to 51% by method. Using a simple rule it was possible to identify patients who had clinically important improvement (36%), patients not improved (53%), and a group of possible improvers (11%). Clinical improvement is shown if RMDQ score is reduced by 30% from baseline and back pain is rated as better on a global rating scale. CONCLUSION: A minimal clinically important difference is derived that is clinically relevant, incorporates the measurement error of the RMDQ, and allows subjects with different grades of severity to improve.
Adult↗
Genetic influences on variation in female orgasmic function: a twin study.
Orgasmic dysfunction in females is commonly reported in the general population with little consensus on its aetiology. We performed a classical twin study to explore whether there were observable genetic influences on female orgasmic dysfunction. Adult females from the TwinsUK register were sent a confidential survey including questions on sexual problems. Complete responses to the questions on orgasmic dysfunction were obtained from 4037 women consisting of 683 monozygotic and 714 dizygotic pairs of female twins aged between 19 and 83 years. One in three women (32%) reported never or infrequently achieving orgasm during intercourse, with a corresponding figure of 21% during masturbation. A significant genetic influence was seen with an estimated heritability for difficulty reaching orgasm during intercourse of 34% (95% confidence interval 27-40%) and 45% (95% confidence interval 38-52%) for orgasm during masturbation. These results show that the wide variation in orgasmic dysfunction in females has a genetic basis and cannot be attributed solely to cultural influences. These results should stimulate further research into the biological and perhaps evolutionary processes governing female sexual function.
Adult↗
Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe cases.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective inception cohort. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and use of a single question on the bothersomeness of low back pain (LBP) as a method of classifying the severity of symptoms among patients seen in clinical practice. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no widely accepted method for classifying patients with nonspecific LBP in clinical practice. There have been no previous reports of the validity and use of a question on bothersomeness as a method of classifying patients with LBP. METHODS: Consecutive patients (30-59 years old) with LBP consulting at 5 United Kingdom general practices (n = 1464) were mailed a questionnaire after consultation and 6 months later. Construct validity was assessed by comparing baseline responses on the single bothersomeness question with pain, disability, general health, and psychologic health measures. The ability of bothersomeness to predict outcomes at 6 months was assessed against pain, disability, work absence, and health care use. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients (65%) completed baseline questionnaires. There were 776 (83%) patients who consented to enter the follow-up study, and 447 returned the 6-month questionnaire. At baseline, bothersomeness correlated with pain, disability, and other measures (P < 0.001), and had 80% sensitivity (61% specificity) to detect people in the highest category of pain and disability. People with bothersome LBP at baseline evaluation had an increased risk of work absence or health care consultations for LBP 6 months later (relative risks 2.8 and 1.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence for the validity of a single bothersomeness question as a measure of LBP severity. It has the potential to provide a practical standard scheme for classifying patients with LBP in clinical practice. However, further work is needed to clarify its usefulness in a clinical setting.
Absenteeism↗
Male Reproductive Health: A village based study of camp attenders in rural India.
BACKGROUND: A paucity of information about male reproductive health and a perceived interest in involvement among local men provided the impetus for carrying out a village based male reproductive health camp. The aim was to investigate men's willingness to participate in such camps, and to describe reproductive health problems in men. METHODS: Structured interviews were carried out with 120 men attending a reproductive health check-up in a village in rural West Bengal, India. General information, details of family planning methods used and data on reproductive health complaints were collected. Clinical examinations were also carried out. Socio-demographic characteristics were compared for men with and without reproductive health and urinary complaints. RESULTS: Three quarters of the married men were using contraception, but the majority stated that their wives were responsible for it. The most common reproductive health complaint was urinary problems; 28% had burning on urination, and 22% reported frequent and/or difficult urination. There were few social or demographic differences between men with and without problems. Seventeen percent of the men had clinically diagnosed reproductive health problems, the most common being urethral discharge. None of the men with diagnosed problems were using condoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the interest of men in their reproductive health, but also highlights the high proportion of men with problems. In addition, a number of men with clinically diagnosed problems had not reported them in the interviews, illustrating either the reticence to report or the lack of knowledge about symptoms of reproductive health problems. Recommendations for future programmes and research in this field are given.
Journal Article↗
Patterns of consent in epidemiologic research: evidence from over 25,000 responders.
Ethical guidelines in the United Kingdom require written consent from participants in epidemiologic studies for follow-up or review of medical records. This may cause bias in samples used for follow-up or medical record review. The authors analyzed data from seven general population surveys conducted in the United Kingdom (1996-2002), to which over 25,000 people responded. Associations of age, gender, and symptom under investigation with consent to follow-up and consent to review of medical records were examined. Consent to follow-up was approximately 75-95% among survey responders under age 50 years but fell among older people, particularly females. Consent to follow-up was also higher among responders who had the symptom under investigation (pooled odds ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.36, 1.92). Consent to review of medical records followed a similar pattern. Patterns of consent were relatively consistent and represented a high proportion of responders. Males, younger people, and subjects reporting the symptom under investigation were more likely to give consent, and these groups may be overrepresented in follow-up samples or reviews of medical records. Although consent is high among responders, the additive effect of nonresponse and nonconsent can substantially reduce sample size and should be taken into account in epidemiologic study planning.
Adolescent↗
Problems with sexual function: comparison with other studies provides interesting findings.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Family Practice↗
Does questionnaire structure influence response in postal surveys?
This study tested the effect of questionnaire structure on response, speed of return, and content of answers in a postal survey. All 259 patients aged 30-59 years who consulted with back pain at four UK general practices from March to June 2001 were randomly allocated to receive either a traditionally or chronologically structured self-completion questionnaire. The response was higher and the returns quicker (P =.05) for the chronologic questionnaire. There were no statistically significant differences in completion rates or scores on the SF-36, Chronic Pain Grade, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, or Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire between the two types of questionnaire, and test-retest reliability was high for all scales. Changing questionnaire structure to make questions chronologic does not substantially affect the answers given, but may make a questionnaire more acceptable and easier to complete and speed up returns.
Adult↗
Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research.
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and group discussions. OBJECTIVE: To propose uniform definitions for low back pain episodes to be used in research. BACKGROUND: Different definitions of episodes have been used in low back pain studies. This hampers comparison of study results. Definitions are proposed for episodes of low back pain, care for low back pain, and work absence because of low back pain. METHODS: In a Medline search, we identified about 1200 papers, of which 81 possibly contained a definition of episodes. In group discussions, we decided which definitions to propose and discussed their applicability. RESULTS: We found few definitions in the literature. In the group discussions we decided to define an episode of LBP as a period of pain in the lower back lasting for more than 24 hours, preceded and followed by a period of at least 1 month without low back pain. An episode of care for low back pain was defined as a consultation or a series of consultations for low back pain, preceded and followed by at least 3 months without consultation for low back pain. An episode of work absence due to low back pain was defined as a period of work absence due to low back pain, preceded and followed by a period of at least 1 day at work. CONCLUSIONS: In many studies, episodes of low back pain are mentioned without a clear definition. We consider our proposed definitions of episodes to be arbitrary but well considered. We advise that they be tested for use in future research.
Absenteeism↗
Systematic review of sexual problems: epidemiology and methodology.
We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review of five sexual problems in order to estimate their population prevalence and to investigate issues arising from the reviewing of epidemiological literature. Two independent reviewers scrutinized abstracts, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Twenty-eight relevant studies were identified. Prevalence figures varied considerably, and meta-analysis was not possible because of heterogeneity in study quality and design. Prevalence depends on case definition, characteristics of the study population, and time frame of the prevalence estimates, therefore, design, implementation, and reporting of epidemiological studies needs standardization before systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be carried out.
Dyspareunia↗