Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Karen Schultz-Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Karen Schultz-Johnson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional capacity evaluation following flexor tendon injury.

This article describes the indications for and the purpose and performance of the upper limb functional capacity evaluation (FCE) for persons who have sustained flexor tendon injury. It begins with the essential foundation concepts such as the U.S. Department of Labor Physical Demand Characteristics of Labor that clinicians use worldwide. The article explains how the clinician forms the plan for each FCE and the essential components that each FCE includes. While variation in the impact of upper limb injury makes a set format for performing the upper limb FCE impossible, even with a specific diagnosis, a general FCE outline with multiple options is presented. A discussion about relevant modifications to maximise function follows the identification of the critical factors to evaluate with flexor tendon injury. Importantly, the article provides insight into controversial issues such as assessment of endurance and inconsistent or sub-maximum effort. It addresses the challenge of documentation and report writing, and concludes with the issue of FCE validity.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Static progressive splinting.

Static progressive splinting is the use of inelastic components to apply torque to a joint in order to statically position it as close to end range as possible. It maximizes total end-range time, thus increasing passive range of motion. As tissue lengthens in response to this carefully applied stress, the clinician or wearer adjusts the joint position to progress tissue at the new maximum tolerable length. Static progressive splinting combines precision in joint position and torque application with patient-controlled stress to create an approach powerful enough to succeed when no other treatment approach does. This article discusses static progressive splinting indications, contraindications, and advantages as well as guidelines for a splinting regimen. It offers many examples of static progressive splinting and makes clear that this approach can be used with any mobilizing splint design. The unique mechanics of this splinting approach are described, and the various methods of achieving static progressive splinting are compared. Offering high levels of patient satisfaction and compliance, static progressive splinting has come to the forefront of clinical practice.

Humans↗