Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Yanashima

Publications and source records attributed to K Yanashima.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Topographical study of stereo-related potentials.

In order to estimate objectively binocular vision and especially stereopsis, random dot stereograms generated by a personal computer were used. Brain activity during stereopsis was topographically studied by visually evoked potentials (VEPs). The potentials evoked by binocular viewing of patterns without disparity, e.g. correlogram, were very similar to the potentials evoked from patterns with disparity, i.e. stereogram, as many authors have already indicated. To derive the stereo-related potentials from the VEP elicited by stereograms, the potentials evoked by correlograms were subtracted from the potentials evoked by stereograms, and the differences of topographical distribution between normal and stereoblind subjects were investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

The relation between the after-negative potential of the pattern electroretinogram and the visually evoked cortical potential.

The relationship between the after-negative potential of the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and the visually evoked cortical potential (VECP) was studied. The PERG was recorded through the use of Toray's high water content, soft contact lens electrode. The PERG consisted of an initial positive potential, a subsequent negative potential and then a slow positive potential. To reduce or avoid contamination of the VECP on the PERG, the most important factor was found to be the reference electrode position; special attention was paid in cases where the amplitude of the VECP was large. In the steady-state condition, the PERG was thought to be modulated by the VECP when the ear lobe was used as the reference electrode position; when the temple was used as the reference electrode position, the amplitude of the PERG was thought to represent that of the after-negative potential.

Contact Lenses↗
PubMed1982

Surface distribution of steady-state cortical potentials evoked by visual half-field stimulation.

The surface distribution of steady-state cortical potentials (VECP) evoked by visual half-field stimulation was analyzed by using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). For all ten normal subjects, checkerboard stimulation of the lower visual half-field evoked the largest response at electrode location Oz, with stimulation for the upper visual half-field at Pz. Recording at Pz, a phase difference of approximately 180 degrees was observed for cortical potentials evoked by lower and upper half-field stimulation, the response being bigger for upper field than for full-field stimulation. Comparing the VECP elicited by stimulation of the right and the left half-field, six of ten subjects displayed the highest amplitude at the contralateral cortex (anatomical type), three subjects at the midline (central type), and one subject at the ipsilateral cortex (paradoxical lateralization type). At Oz there was little phase difference in the VECP with stimulation of the right and left visual half-field, and the amplitude was about half that for full-field stimulation. However, with the electrode placed at the temporal region of the skull there was a big phase difference of VECP signals; consequently, the sum of the amplitudes did not amount to the amplitude for full-field stimulation. The dipole theory of scalp distribution of VECP signals was found to be also applicable to conditions of steady-state stimulation, including polarity reversal for upper and lower visual half-field stimulation.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Artifact removal procedure distorts multifocal electroretinogram.

PURPOSE: To study whether the Artifact Removal procedure available for eliminating artifacts in multifocal electroretinograms (mERG) works correctly or not. METHODS: A test response was made using a photo-diode circuit. mERGs were recorded from 3 well-trained normal subjects using the Veris III system, and were then analyzed by the procedure that is included in the Veris Science (Artifact Removal) software program. The stimuli consisted of densely arranged arrays of 103 or 37 hexagonal elements. It took a total of 8 minutes to obtain one mERG record, and 16 sessions were required to complete this record. The first-order as well as the second-order kernel response components were extracted by Veris Science software, and the Artifact Removal procedure was used for both components. RESULTS: The Artifact Removal procedure influenced both the test response on the center element as well as the neighboring traces just around the test response. After the repetitions of the Artifact Removal procedure, the shape of the test response changed considerably. Some of the traces of the second-order kernel response components elicited from a normal subject changed irregularly when the Artifact Removal procedure was repeatedly used. The noise increased at the first iteration of the Artifact Removal procedure. CONCLUSION: This procedure has been considered useful for eliminating artifact distortion in mERG, but should be carefully checked by well-established testing methods before clinical use.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Analysis of second-order kernel response components of multifocal electroretinograms elicited from normal subjects.

PURPOSE: It has been reported that the second-order kernel response components of multifocal electroretinograms (mERGs) reflect the electrical activity of the inner retinal layers. In this study, we have investigated whether the amplitudes of the second-order kernel response components correlate with the spatial distribution of human retinal ganglion cells. METHODS: Multifocal electroretinograms were recorded using the Veris III system from 5 healthy subjects with different stimulus and recording parameters. The mERGs were analyzed using the Veris Science software programs. The stimuli consisted of densely arranged arrays of 103, 61, 37 or 19 hexagonal elements. Four minutes were required to record one set of mERG responses using 8 sessions, and 8 minutes using 16 sessions. The second-order kernel response components were extracted and analyzed using the Veris Science program. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratio of the first-order kernel response components was improved considerably by the summation of the nine reproducible responses from the same subject but the second-order kernel response components were not. The summation of the nine reproducible responses was insufficient to identify an array of the second-order kernel response components. Both the first- and second-order kernel response components were larger when fewer hexagonal elements were used. There was no significant difference in the individual responses between the 4-minute and the 8-minute recordings. A response density analysis revealed a weak correlation between the amplitude distribution of the second-order kernel response components and the spatial distribution of human retinal ganglion cells. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of the amplitudes of the second-order kernel response components of the mERGs elicited from normal subjects did not correlate with the distribution of human ganglion cells. This suggests that the theory that second-order kernel response components arise from the activity of retinal ganglion cells should be reconsidered.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Relationship between visual field defect and multifocal electroretinogram.

We investigated the effect of artificial parafoveal scotomata on the multifocal electroretinogram (M-ERG). M-ERGs were recorded from normal subjects using a monitor with several different sizes of black paper attached. A lower response density area around the 10 to 15 degree parafoveal region was not recognized for scotomata up to 3 degrees but was observed in scotomata above 5 degrees (visual angle) in the field topography of M-ERG. The shape of the scotomata was not circular but somewhat oval. The results from two cases of parafoveal retinal degeneration accorded well with this basic study.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance.

PURPOSE: To investigate the reproducibility as well as the effect of luminance in multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). METHODS: Multifocal electroretinogram recordings were repeated on different days in 6 normal subjects using the Veris III system. The mean luminance of the monitor displaying the stimuli was randomly varied by five kinds of neutral density (ND) filters. RESULTS: The standard deviation of mERG amplitude from the macular region was approximately 10% of the mean value for each normal subject. Reproducibility largely depended on the condition of the subject and placement of the contact lens electrode. With decreases in the mean luminance of the monitor, the amplitude of mERG decreased exponentially, whereas the peak latency increased linearly. mERGs elicited from a patient with mild cortical cataract resembled the mERGs obtained from the control group using an ND filter between -0.30 and -0.52 log, whereas two patients with typical retinitis pigmentosa showed much lower response densities in mERGs. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to pay attention to the reproducibility and the luminance effect to obtain reliable mERGs.

Adult↗