Biomedical subjects

K W Beers

Publications and source records attributed to K W Beers.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1987

Intake, digestion, passage rate and serum prolactin in growing dairy steers fed endophyte-infected fescue with noninfected fescue, clover or wheat straw.

Growing Holstein steers were used in two Latin-square experiments to determine the effects of supplementation of endophyte-infected fescue hay diets with other forages on intake, digestion, passage rate and serum prolactin concentration. In Exp. 1, five steers (average weight of 186 kg) were fed ad libitum amounts of endophyte-infected and noninfected fescue hays (I and NI, respectively) of similar quality in 0:1, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and 1:0 proportions. Total dry matter (DM) intake as a percentage of body weight (BW) linearly decreased .0055% for each 1% increase in dietary I (P less than .05). Dry matter intakes with 100% I and 100% NI diets were 2.13 and 2.72% of BW, respectively. Total tract digestion of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) increased linearly (P less than .05) with increasing I (66.0, 65.9, 66.3, 68.1 and 69.6%). Ruminal passage rate of particulates changed linearly (P less than .05) and quadratically (P less than .10) as I in the diet increased (3.5, 3.4, 2.6, 2.8 and 2.8%/h), while serum prolactin concentration and rectal temperature decreased linearly (P less than .05). In Exp. 2, four steers (average weight of 137 kg) were given ad libitum amounts of wheat straw (WS) or .73% of BW of clover hay (C) at 0800 and free access to either I or NI at 1600. Total intake as a percentage of BW was greatest for C with NI (3.04), intermediate for WS with NI (2.70) and lowest for C with I (2.30) and WS with I (2.23; P less than .05). Fescue intake (percentage of BW) was lowest (P less than .05) for C with I (1.56) and higher (P less than .05) for WS with NI (2.63) than WS with I (2.12); fescue intake for C with NI (2.33) was intermediate (P greater than .10) to WS with NI and WS with I. The results are interpreted to indicate that increasing the dietary level of I depressed intake linearly and markedly. Intake of diets high in I appears to be lower than can be explained only by ruminal-fill factors. When animals that are consuming basal I diets are provided access to nontoxic, high-quality forage, changes in intake may differ from those with basal diets of nontoxic forage.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed1987

Effects of offering different amounts and types of supplemental feeds to growing dairy steers fed endophyte-infected fescue hay ad libitum on intake, digestion, passage rate and serum prolactin concentration.

Ten Holstein steers (141 kg) were used in two 5 X 5 Latin-square experiments conducted simultaneously to determine the effects of offering different levels and types of feeds with endophyte-infected fescue given ad libitum. In Exp. 1, steers were given ad libitum access to infected fescue hay in the afternoon; in the morning fescue was given ad libitum (basal) or bermudagrass or clover hays were fed at .5 or 1.0% of body weight (BW). Supplementation did not affect total dry matter intake (P greater than .10), but supplementation at 1.0% of BW yielded total intake greater than supplementation at .5% of BW (P less than .05). Supplementation did not change digestibilities of dry or organic matter (P greater than .10). Particulate passage rate was greater (P less than .10) with supplementation at 1.0 than at .5% of BW, and increasing the level of supplementation from .5 to 1.0% of BW affected fluid passage rate positively with clover but negatively with bermudagrass (interaction, P less than .05). Serum prolactin increased (P less than .05) with all supplementation treatments, although no differences were observed between supplement type-supplementation level combinations (P greater than .10). Ground corn and wheat hay were supplements in Exp. 2. Total intake of dry matter was greater with supplements provided at 1.0 rather than at .5% of BW and for corn rather than wheat hay (P less than .05). Neutral detergent fiber digestion (percent of intake and grams per day) rose when wheat hay was offered at 1.0 vs .5% of BW but declined when the level of supplemental corn increased from .5 to 1.0% of BW (interaction, P less than .05). There were no differences among diets in particulate and fluid passage rates and serum prolactin concentration. Supplementation with nontoxic forage of a basal diet of infected fescue yielded intake substitution when forage was offered at .5% of BW, although incomplete substitution occurred with 1.0% of BW of supplemental forage such that total intake increased as compared to the lower level of supplementation.

Animal Feed↗