Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K S Berbaum

Publications and source records attributed to K S Berbaum.

92 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Determinants of intravenous conscious sedation for arteriography.

PURPOSE: To assess factors that determine the amount of drugs given for intravenous conscious sedation during arteriography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 254 patients undergoing infradiaphragmatic arteriography at three institutions were evaluated. The effect of age, sex, procedure time, attending physician, and institution on drug use was assessed by analysis of variance and covariance with repeated measures. In a subset of 34 patients, pain and anxiety scores before and after medication were correlated with drug scores. RESULTS: Institution identity and procedure time significantly affected the amount of medication used (both, P = .000). Patient's age and sex, and identity of the physician had no significant effects. While drug use was relatively constant in each institution among different staff physicians, the institutional differences prevailed when the same physicians performed procedures at different institutions. Drug deliveries did not correlate with anxiety and pain scores before or after medication. CONCLUSION: Habits and philosophies of particular institutions, rather than physician guidance or patients' needs, tend to govern the use of intravenous sedatives and analgesics. There is a need for a more patient-oriented standardization of intravenous conscious sedation and analgesia.

Aged↗

Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies.

Conventional hardcopy images from 266 body CT studies were compared with those provided at a commercially available picture archiving communication system (PACS) workstation. Unprocessed PACS images were larger but otherwise precisely duplicated hardcopy images. The PACS images were evaluated before and after application of various image processing/display features. Approximately three-quarters of the cases were depicted equally well with PACS and hardcopy, but in one quarter of the cases, diagnostic features were judged to be shown more clearly at the PACS workstation. When PACS images were viewed first, change in diagnosis after subsequent hardcopy inspection was infrequent (confidence change: 4%; different findings: 2%). Conversely, when hardcopy images were viewed first, change in diagnosis after subsequent PACS inspection was more frequent (confidence change: 19%; different findings: 8%). Specialized image manipulation available on PACS was critical for its performance. Review of cases with new findings discovered during the second inspection showed the majority of them to be clinically significant, true-positives discovered by PACS. We conclude that PACS is a useful modality for interpretation of body CT images.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗