Biomedical subjects

K Pisarska

Publications and source records attributed to K Pisarska.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

The usefulness of testicular atrophy index in the assessment of undescended testicle--preliminary report.

PURPOSE: Cryptorchidism affects 2-8% of male newborns. There is a controversy regarding timing of surgery as well as indications for orchiopexy in boys with retractile testicle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of testicular atrophy index (TAI) as a criterion of qualifying patients with undescended testes for surgery as well as of monitoring the results of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1999-2000, 105 cryptorchid boys, aged 1 to 15 years (mean 4.8) underwent unilateral orchiopexy. Dimensions and volume of testes were measured by means of scrotal US and TAI was calculated before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative scrotal US measurements were analyzed in 35 boys divided into five age dependent groups. The preoperative TAI values ranged from 27.1% to 52.8%. The biggest loss in volume of affected testis was found in boys aged 4 to 10 years (35.4% to 52.8%). The TAI values measured one year after orchiopexy were lower than preoperative ones. Significant difference in TAI values, ranging from 18.16% to 36.43% were observed in boys between 2 and 10 years (p < 0.001). In the youngest (0-2 yrs) and the oldest boys (> 10 yrs) the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The testicular atrophy index (TAI) proved to be a valuable and objective tool for qualifying patients with undescended testes for surgery as well as for monitoring the results of treatment. Its value of 20% and more should be considered an indication for surgery in boys with retractile testes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

[Endocarditis lenta--a problematic disease].

4 endocarditis lenta cases with negative blood cultures are reported: 3 patients with risk heart lesions and 1 subject with no predisposing cardiac condition. The mean age of the patients was 53.7 years. Based on the cases reported the following items are discussed: evolution of the clinical syndrome, diagnostic difficulties, problem of negative blood cultures, therapeutic procedure.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Some obese subjects repeatedly fail to lose weight even though they report restricting their caloric intake to less than 1200 kcal per day. We studied two explanations for this apparent resistance to diet--low total energy expenditure and underreporting of caloric intake--in 224 consecutive obese subjects presenting for treatment. Group 1 consisted of nine women and one man with a history of diet resistance in whom we evaluated total energy expenditure and its main thermogenic components and actual energy intake for 14 days by indirect calorimetry and analysis of body composition. Group 2, subgroups of which served as controls in the various evaluations, consisted of 67 women and 13 men with no history of diet resistance. RESULTS: Total energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate in the subjects with diet resistance (group 1) were within 5 percent of the predicted values for body composition, and there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in the thermic effects of food and exercise. Low energy expenditure was thus excluded as a mechanism of self-reported diet resistance. In contrast, the subjects in group 1 underreported their actual food intake by an average (+/- SD) of 47 +/- 16 percent and overreported their physical activity by 51 +/- 75 percent. Although the subjects in group 1 had no distinct psychopathologic characteristics, they perceived a genetic cause for their obesity, used thyroid medication at a high frequency, and described their eating behavior as relatively normal (all P < 0.05 as compared with group 2). CONCLUSIONS: The failure of some obese subjects to lose weight while eating a diet they report as low in calories is due to an energy intake substantially higher than reported and an overestimation of physical activity, not to an abnormality in thermogenesis.

Calorimetry↗