Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K M Gilbert

Publications and source records attributed to K M Gilbert.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

B cell presentation of a tolerogenic signal to Th clones.

Lightly irradiated (950 R) splenic B cells were inefficient, in comparison to unseparated spleen cells, in stimulating antigen-specific proliferation of Th1 clones specific for human gamma globulin (HGG). This inefficiency was due to antigen-specific inactivation: Th1 clones preincubated with HGG and lightly irradiated B cells or mitomycin C-treated B cells were unable to proliferate to HGG in secondary cultures. In contrast to Th1 clones, Th2 clones proliferated well in response to B cell APC, and showed no decrease in their subsequent antigen-induced proliferative capacity after exposure to lightly irradiated B cells and HGG. However, preincubation of Th2 with lightly irradiated B cells and HGG did inactivate the capacity of Th2 to provide help for antibody production in secondary cultures. These results suggest that under certain conditions B cells may present antigen to Th1 and Th2 cells in a tolerogenic rather than an immunogenic manner.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effects of tolerance induction on early cell cycle progression by Th1 clones.

Human gamma-globulin (HGG)-specific mouse Th1 clones exposed to tolerogenic signals provided by HGG-pulsed paraformaldehyde-fixed splenocytes (HGG-FAPC) were analyzed for antigen-induced progression through the early phases of the cell cycle. Exposure of Th1 clones to HGG-FAPC in primary cultures inhibits the ability of the clones to synthesize DNA in response to HGG and normal APC in secondary cultures. The Th1 clones in these secondary cultures were found to be blocked in G1a phase as evidenced by cell cycle analysis and by reduced numbers of cells expressing high levels of IL-2R and TfR. This cell cycle blockade of Th1 cells was not observed if the secondary cultures were stimulated with IL-2-containing Con A CM instead of antigen. These data suggest that in our system the inhibition in antigen-induced cell cycle progression associated with Th1 tolerance induction occurs at the G1a/G1b phase transition.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Ability of tolerized Th1 and Th2 clones to stimulate B cell activation and cell cycle progression.

Tolerant and nontolerant murine Th1 and Th2 clones, specific for human gamma-globulin (HGG), were compared for their ability to promote cell cycle entry and progression by B cells in vitro. When stimulated with HGG, nontolerant Th1 and Th2 clones induced similar increases in B cell membrane MHC class II levels--a phenomenon associated with early B cell activation. Nontolerant Th1 and Th2 clones also induced B cell DNA synthesis, an event associated with subsequent G1 phase traversal, although Th2 cells were more efficient than Th1 cells in stimulating this activity. Exposure of Th clones to tolerogen in the form of HGG-pulsed chemically fixed APC inhibited the ability of Th1 clones, but not Th2 clones to promote polyclonal B cell DNA synthesis in HGG-stimulated secondary cultures. However, Th1 clones exposed to tolerogen did not lose their ability to increase the expression of MHC class II molecules on B cells in these cultures. These results indicate that tolerance induction does not inhibit the ability of Th1 clones promote B cell cycle progression. In contrast, exposure of Th2 cells to tolerogen does not inhibit significantly the ability of these cells to stimulate B cell cycle entry or progression.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Differential abilities of Th1 and Th2 to induce polyclonal B cell proliferation.

Human gamma globulin-specific T helper cell (Th) clones, activated by HGG in the presence of antigen (Ag)-presenting cells, stimulated polyclonal B cell proliferation. Both Th1 and Th2 clones induced B cell proliferation, but Th1 clones were generally 5- to 10-fold less efficient than Th2 in this capacity. Th1 and Th2 each induced proliferation of both small and large B cells, although Th1 induced less B cell proliferation than Th2, regardless of B cell size. Th1-induced B cell proliferation was increased significantly by stimulating the Th1 clones with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb. The B cell response to Ag-activated Th1 clones was also increased by the addition of rIL-4 or culture supernatants from activated Th2 clones, and this enhancement was abolished by addition of anti-IL-4 mAb. The differential capacity of the Th subsets to stimulate B cells could not be attributed to differences in the degree of Ag-induced activation of the Th clones as reflected by Th proliferation or Th expression of activation markers, RL388 Ag, IL-2R, or TfR. Taken together the results suggest that even though Th1 and Th2 are similarly activated by Ag-presenting cells, Ag-activated Th2 interact more effectively with B cells than Ag-activated Th1. It is possible that inefficient interaction and subsequent intercellular signaling between Th1 and B cells results in inefficient Th1-induced B cell proliferation, and that this deficiency may be circumvented by signals (e.g., lymphokines) provided by Th2, or by the stimulation of Th1 with plate-bound anti-CD3 Ab rather than Ag.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Th1 and Th2 clones differ in their response to a tolerogenic signal.

Th1 and Th2 clones specific for human gamma globulin (HGG) were compared and shown to differ in terms of the effects of tolerance induction on Ag-induced proliferation and helper activity. In developing a method to induce tolerance, splenic APC that had been pulsed with HGG and then fixed with 0.15% paraformaldehyde (HGG-FAPC) were used as a means to present Ag to the Th clones in the absence of costimulatory signals. Both Th1 and Th2 clones recognized HGG-FAPC as evidenced by their ability to proliferate to HGG-FAPC. Unlike Th2, Th1 proliferated to HGG-FAPC only in the presence of T cell-depleted allogeneic spleen cells as a source of accessory cell signals. The inability of Th1 cells to proliferate in the absence of costimulatory signals was due to Ag-specific inactivation: Th1 clones preincubated with HGG-FAPC were unable to proliferate when recultured with HGG and irradiated APC. In contrast to Th1 clones, Th2 clones showed no decrease in their Ag-induced proliferative capacity after exposure to any concentration of HGG-FAPC. However, when examined by using a second assay system, that of providing help for anti-HGG antibody production by primed B cells, Th2 preincubated with HGG-FAPC were markedly inhibited (up to 90%) in their ability to provide help. Preincubation with HGG-FAPC also inhibited the helper activity of the one Th1 clone that was found to induce a significant secondary antibody response. Taken together, the results suggest that exposure of Th1 to tolerogen in the form of HGG-pulsed fixed APC inactivates Th1 proliferative capacity, and possibly Th1 helper activity as well. Exposure of Th2 cells to a tolerogen suppresses the mechanism by which the Th2 cells provide Ag-induced B cell help, but does not inhibit the mechanism by which they proliferate to HGG. Furthermore, the results define a model that incorporates Ag processing as well as Ag presentation in the induction of tolerance in vitro.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Generation in vivo of non-T suppressor cells with the use of anti-allotype antibody.

Anti-Igh-1b antiserum induced allotype-specific suppression of adult mouse spleen cells in an adoptive transfer system. Suppression of Igh-1b anti-sheep red blood cell plaque-forming cells was measured as late as 4 wk after the injection of allotype heterozygous (Igha/b) spleen cells, antiserum, and sheep red blood cells. Suppression was maintained on retransfer of the allotype-suppressed spleen cells to further irradiated recipients in the absence of additional exogenous anti-allotype antibody. Mixing experiments were performed to test the putative inhibitory effects of allotype-suppressed spleen cells from the first adoptive transfer (stage I) on the antibody response of normal spleen cells in a second adoptive transfer (stage II). No suppression was observed by using unfractionated stage I spleen cells. In contrast, when these allotype-suppressed spleen cells were depleted of T cells, they strongly inhibited the antibody production of admixed normal spleen cells in stage II. This inhibitory activity of antibody-induced stage I spleen cells was directed primarily toward the target allotype, but some suppression of the Igh-1a plaque-forming cell response and total IgG production also occurred. Although removal of adherent cells did not affect the inhibitory activity of allotype-suppressed spleen cells from stage I, removal of Ig+ cells completely abrogated the inhibitory activity. These results suggest that antibody-induced regulatory B cells may play a role in maintaining long term allotype suppression.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

An essential role for interleukin 1 and a dual function for interleukin 2 in the immune response of murine B lymphocytes to sheep erythrocytes.

The macrophage-derived lymphokine interleukin 1 (IL-1) and the T cell-derived lymphokine interleukin 2 (IL-2) help B lymphocytes to generate antibodies against sheep erythrocytes in vitro. It has been difficult to determine whether these factors act on antigen-reactive B cells directly or via accessory cells, since it is not technically feasible to prepare completely homogenous cell populations. Therefore we examined the question of lymphokine action on B cells using an indirect approach. First we determined effects of the two factors in the phenotypic differentiation assay, a short-term culture of cloned B cells certainly free of accessory cells. Next, we investigated whether the effects seen in this assay could be related to results obtained in the long-term (four-day) assay of antibody production. Interleukin 1 induced cloned 70Z/3 B lymphocytes to express new cell surface markers in the phenotypic B cell differentiation assay. IL-2 rendered these B cells refractory to differentiation caused by IL-1. In the antibody production assay, IL-1 controlled, as was shown previously, an early phase of the response in which B cells become responsive to T cell-derived helper factors. In order to demonstrate the requirement for IL-1, it was necessary to rigorously prevent endogenous IL-1 production. Synergy between IL-1 and IL-2 was observed when IL-2 was given as late as day 2 of a four-day culture period. This synergy was seen over a broad dose range of IL-2 (10-1,000 U/ml). However, IL-2, when added in high concentrations (200-1,000 U/ml) during the early (IL-1-dependent) phase of the B cell response inhibited antibody production.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1985

cAMP is an essential signal in the induction of antibody production by B cells but inhibits helper function of T cells.

Dibutyryl cAMP and IL 1 were found to stimulate antigen-specific and polyclonal antibody production when added together to cultures of highly purified B cells. We propose that IL 1 and an elevation in cytoplasmic cAMP represent minimal signal requirements for B cell activation. In contrast to its effect on B cells, dibutyryl cAMP inhibited helper T cell activity. Cyclic AMP suppressed the production of IL 2 and T cell replacing factor (TRF) by T cells and thus abrogated the ability of helper T cells to enhance SRBC-specific antibody production by B cells. Cyclic AMP did not inhibit the generation by T cells of B cell growth factor (BCGF). BCGF, not normally detected in Con A supernatant, was found in the culture supernatant of spleen cells that were stimulated with Con A in the presence of cAMP. Our findings indicate that cAMP blocks the production of an inhibitor of BCGF activity. cAMP had no effect on the production by macrophages of IL 1.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Lymphokine-induced suppressor B cells.

Accessory activity required for in vitro antibody production by murine B cells is mediated by macrophage- and helper T-cell-derived lymphokines (IL-1 and TRF, respectively). The synergistic helper activity that occurs when TRF is added early rather than late in the response cannot be attributed to the initiation. We found that the suboptimal helper activity which occurs when TRF is added early rather than late in the response cannot be attributed to the inactivation of the mediator, but results instead from the generation of helper factor-induced suppressor cells. Serological examination revealed that these suppressor cells exhibit the cell surface phenotype (Thy 1-, Ia+, IgG+, IgD+) of a B cell. In an attempt to attribute the generation of suppressor B cells to a distinct T-cell product we examined two T-cell mediators believed to be present in TRF, namely IL-2 and a second factor recently introduced as (DL) TRF. Our results point to a dichotomy of the induction pathways involved in the generation of antibody-forming cells and the activation of suppressor B cells, the former involving IL-1 and IL-2, and the latter involving IL-1 and (DL) TRF.

Animals↗