Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Keenan

Publications and source records attributed to K Keenan.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

A double-blind placebo controlled study of desipramine in the treatment of ADD: III. Lack of impact of comorbidity and family history factors on clinical response.

A 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of desipramine (DMI) in daily doses averaging 4 to 5 mg/kg for the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) was further analyzed. Investigators examined whether comorbidity of ADDH with conduct disorder, major depression, an anxiety disorder, or a family history of ADDH predicted response to DMI treatment. There was a highly significant effect of treatment with DMI in outcome assessments, but responses to DMI were indistinguishable in ADDH patients with and without a comorbid disorder or familial ADDH. Cases of "pure" ADDH (lacking comorbidity with depression, anxiety, or conduct disorder and having a positive family history of ADDH) showed a trend toward lesser placebo responses and a corresponding greater DMI-placebo difference. These findings suggest that (1) DMI is effective in simple, noncomorbid cases, (2) DMI is not selective for comorbid cases, but (3) a response to DMI can be obtained even in complex cases of ADDH with associated comorbidity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Evidence for the independent familial transmission of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities: results from a family genetic study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to clarify the relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities. METHOD: The authors assessed learning disabilities in a sample of 140 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and in 120 normal comparison children. They also assessed a sample of the probands' 822 first-degree relatives. RESULTS: The risk for learning disabilities was highest among relatives of probands with both attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities. The two disorders did not cosegregate in families. There was nonrandom mating between spouses with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The two disorders are transmitted independently in families, and their co-occurrence may be due to nonrandom mating. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is likely to be etiologically independent from learning disabilities.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Further evidence for family-genetic risk factors in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Patterns of comorbidity in probands and relatives psychiatrically and pediatrically referred samples.

We examined 140 probands with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 120 normal controls, and their 822 first-degree relatives using "blind" raters and structured diagnostic interviews. Compared with controls, probands with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were more likely to have conduct, mood, and anxiety disorders. Compared with relatives of controls, relatives of probands with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder had a higher risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, antisocial disorders, major depressive disorder, substance dependence, and anxiety disorders. Patterns of comorbidity indicate that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and major depressive disorders may share common familial vulnerabilities, that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder plus conduct disorder may be a distinct subtype, and that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders are transmitted independently in families. These results extend previous findings indicating family-genetic influences in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by using both pediatrically and psychiatrically referred proband samples. The distributions of comorbid illnesses in families provide further validation for subgrouping probands with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by comorbidity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Evidence of familial association between attention deficit disorder and major affective disorders.

With the use of family study methods and assessments by "blinded" raters, we tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) and affective disorders (AFFs) among first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (73 probands, 264 relatives) and normal controls (26 probands, 92 relatives). Among the 73 ADD probands, 24 (33%) met criteria for AFFs (major depression, n = 15 [21%]; bipolar disorder, n = 8 [11%]; and dysthymia, n = 1 [1%]). After stratification of the ADD sample into those with AFFs (ADD + AFF) and those without AFF (ADD), familial risk analyses revealed the following: (1) the relatives of each ADD proband subgroup were at significantly greater risk for ADD than were relatives of normal controls; (2) the age-corrected morbidity risk for ADD was not significantly different between relatives of ADD and ADD + AFF (27% vs 22%); however, these two risks were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of normal controls (5%); (3) the risk for any AFF (bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or dysthymia) was not significantly different between relatives of ADD probands and ADD + AFF probands (28% and 25%), but these two risks were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of normal controls (4%); (4) ADD and AFFs did not cosegregate within families; and (5) there was no evidence for nonrandom mating. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that ADD and AFFs may share common familial vulnerabilities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Separation of DSM-III attention deficit disorder and conduct disorder: evidence from a family-genetic study of American child psychiatric patients.

Using family study methodology and assessments by blind raters, this study tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) and antisocial disorders (childhood conduct (CD) and oppositional disorder (OPD) and adult antisocial personality disorder) among 457 first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (73 probands, 264 relatives), psychiatric (26 probands, 101 relatives) and normal controls (26 probands, 92 relatives). Among the 73 ADD probands, 33 (45%) met criteria for OPD, 24 (33%) met criteria for CD, and 16 (22%) had no antisocial diagnosis. After stratifying the ADD sample into those with CD (ADD + CD), those with OPD (ADD + OPD) and those with neither (ADD) familial risk analysis revealed the following: (1) relatives of each ADD proband subgroup were at significantly greater risk for ADD than relatives of both psychiatric and normal controls: (2) the morbidity risk for ADD was highest among relatives of ADD + CD probands (38%), moderate among relatives of ADD + OPD (17%) and ADD probands (24%) and lowest among relatives of psychiatric and normal controls (5% for both); (3) the risk for any antisocial disorder was highest among relatives of ADD + CD (34%) and ADD + OPD (24%) which were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of ADD probands (11%), psychiatric (7%) and normal controls (4%); and (4) both ADD and antisocial disorders occurred in the same relatives more often than expected by chance alone. Although these findings suggest that ADD with and without antisocial disorders may be aetiologically distinct disorders, they are also consistent with a multifactorial hypothesis in which ADD, ADD + OPD and ADD + CD fall along a continuum of increasing levels of familial aetiological factors and, correspondingly, severity of illness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

A family-genetic study of girls with DSM-III attention deficit disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated family-genetic risk factors in girls with attention deficit disorder and compared these results to findings in the authors' previous study of boys with attention deficit disorder. METHOD: Twenty-one girls with attention deficit disorder and 20 normal comparison girls were consecutively ascertained from a pool of existing and new referrals from a pediatric psychopharmacology unit and a medical pediatric unit of the same urban hospital. First-degree relatives of the attention deficit disordered girls (N = 69) and of the normal girls (N = 71) were also assessed. Both groups of girls and their relatives were evaluated on the basis of structured diagnostic interviews conducted by raters who were blind to the clinical status of the probands. RESULTS: The relatives of the girls with attention deficit disorder had higher risks for attention deficit disorder, antisocial disorders, major depression, and anxiety disorders. The higher risk for attention deficit disorder could not be accounted for by gender or generation of relative, age of proband, social class, or family intactness. These findings are highly consistent with the findings in the authors' previous study of boys with attention deficit disorder, which was conducted with identical methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further support for the validity of the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder in girls and suggests that the genders share a common biological substrate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Familial association between attention deficit disorder and anxiety disorders.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: This study tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between attention deficit disorder (ADD) and anxiety disorders among 356 first-degree relatives of 73 clinically referred children with ADD and 26 normal comparison children. Through structured diagnostic interviews with trained raters, relatives were assessed for adult and childhood psychopathology. After stratifying the sample of ADD probands into those with anxiety disorders and those without, the authors examined patterns of aggregation of ADD and anxiety disorders in the relatives of these probands as well as in the relatives of the normal comparison subjects. RESULTS: Familial risk analyses revealed that 1) familial risk for anxiety disorders was higher among all ADD probands than among the normal subjects; 2) familial risk for ADD was similar in the relatives of the ADD probands and of the probands with ADD and anxiety disorder; 3) the relatives of the ADD probands with and without anxiety disorders were at greater risk for ADD than the relatives of the normal subjects; 4) the risk for anxiety disorders was two times higher in the relatives of the probands who had ADD with anxiety disorder than in those of the ADD probands without anxiety disorders; and 5) there was a tendency for ADD probands' relatives who themselves had ADD to have a higher risk for anxiety disorders than ADD probands' relatives who did not have ADD (cosegregation). CONCLUSIONS: The results were most consistent with the hypotheses indicating that ADD and anxiety disorders segregate independently in families.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Comorbidity in the interpretation of dexamethasone suppression test results in children: a review and report.

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was administered as part of the initial clinical assessment to 83 children and adolescents who were consecutively referred for outpatient evaluation. All diagnoses were made clinically by a child psychiatrist according to DSM-III criteria. A weight-corrected dose of dexamethasone of 17 micrograms/kg was used. DSM-III diagnoses were made independent of DST results. Patients were stratified into four main diagnostic groups: major depressive disorder (MDD) (N = 27); attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) (N = 22); major depressive disorder plus attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (MDD + ADDH) (N = 29); and psychiatric controls (PC) (N = 5). Rates of dexamethasone nonsuppression were found to be similarly elevated in children with MDD (29.6%), ADDH (22.7%), and MDD + ADDH (37.9%). All 5 psychiatric control patients had a normal postdexamethasone suppression (0%). A similar pattern of results emerged in a reexamination of the literature on available studies of DST in juveniles which revealed that children with major affective disorders, attention deficit disorder (ADDH), and anxiety disorders had comparable DST results that were significantly higher than the 5.6% rate found in normal controls. These findings provide further support for similarities in DST results between ADDH and MDD in outpatients. Although these results suggest a lack of specificity of the DST as a laboratory aid for the diagnosis of juvenile affective disorders, they are also consistent with findings indicating that the DST may be an index of clinical severity and other findings suggesting a possible association between ADDH and MDD. Despite its limitations, the DST may provide potentially useful clinical and research information regarding the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders and in alerting clinicians to the presence of serious psychiatric disorders. The findings also stress the relevance of assessing comorbidity in interpreting DST results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Family-genetic and psychosocial risk factors in DSM-III attention deficit disorder.

Using family study methodology and assessments made by blind raters, this study evaluated family-genetic and psychosocial risk factors for DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) among the 457 first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (N = 73), compared with psychiatric (N = 26) and normal controls (N = 26). Relatives of ADD probands had a higher morbidity risk for ADD (25.1% versus 5.3% versus 4.6%, ps less than 0.00001), antisocial disorders (25.3% versus 6.9% versus 4.2%, ps less than 0.00001), and mood disorders (27.1% versus 13.9%, p = 0.038 and 27.1% versus 3.6%, p = 0.00001) than did relatives of psychiatric and normal controls. The increased risk for ADD could not be accounted for by gender or generation of relative, the age of proband, social class, or the intactness of the family. These results confirm and extend previous findings indicating important family-genetic risk factors in ADD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Parent-based diagnosis of attention deficit disorder predicts a diagnosis based on teacher report.

The literature evaluating agreement between parent and teacher reports on symptoms of attention deficit disorder (ADD) has repeatedly shown only modest correlations between these two sources of information. A more relevant statistic to this clinical issue, however, is the positive predictive power, the conditional probability that diagnostic criteria will be met by teacher's report if that diagnosis has been made based on parental report. In a population of 43 children (ages 4 to 17) satisfying clinical criteria for DSM-III ADD, parents and teachers independently completed them module on ADD derived from the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents. Although correlations for individual symptoms were low to moderate, there was a 90% probability that the teacher report would result in a positive diagnosis given a positive parent diagnosis, indicating a very high probability that, in clinically referred children, a clinical diagnosis of ADD based on parent report will be corroborated by a teacher report.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

Particle-based axenic media for tetrahymenids.

Autoclavable, natural particulate media simplify axenic cultivation of tetrahymenid ciliates and presumably favor selection for phagotrophy. Viability is at least 2 months at room temperature (24-26 C) for the lipid-sensitive tetrahymenids Tetrahymena setosa, T. corlissi, T. paravorax, T. limacis, and T. patula, also for T. rostrata and (at 12 C), for strains of the T. pyriformis complex and Glaucoma chattoni. A typical medium consists of crude soy "lecithin" + skim milk powder + Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Other useful particules readily available commercially are: whole liver powder, cells of Micrococcus lysodeikticus and Escherichia coli, and powdered residue of liver which had been extracted with 70% ethanol ("liver No. 2). Preliminary experiments indicate that some of these media are suitable for the maintenance of Paramecium octaurelia stock 299S and Colpidium campylum. Such mixtures may serve as points of departure for devising media for more fastidious phagotrophs.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Subluxation injuries of maxillary primary anterior teeth: epidemiology and prognosis of 207 traumatized teeth.

This study investigated the epidemiology, sequelae, and prognosis of subluxation injuries to the maxillary primary anterior dentition. Data were collected from dental records at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Canada, of patients sustaining trauma between 1982 and 1993. The study group consisted of 207 teeth in 134 patients, 81 males and 53 females. The age of the patients ranged from 0.8 years to 7.5 years, with a mean of 3.5 years. The highest incidence of trauma was in males between the ages of 3 and 4 years, and in females between 1 and 3 years. The highest incidence of trauma (66.2%) involved the primary central incisors. The most common cause of trauma (52%) was simple falls indoors. Occlusal or periapical radiographs were the radiographic view of choice unless an anterior nasal spine fracture was suspected, in which case a lateral projection was exposed. Approximately 64% of the study teeth had a mobility ranging from 0.6 to 1.5 mm. Treatment varied from no treatment (80% of teeth) to extraction. Post-traumatic evaluations were distributed into six common time intervals used by dentists for follow up. The results indicated that patient discomfort and occlusal interference were not common. Discoloration and pulpal calcification increased with time. Mobility decreased with time, with the majority of teeth returning to a normal physiologic range. External resorption may have been present, but was rare. Treatment or antibiotics were rarely needed at follow-up visits. Overall, these teeth responded positively, and there was a low morbidity associated with subluxation injuries.

Accidental Falls↗