PubMed1987
Fifty-six patients with complex ventricular premature beats (Lown grade IVa, IVb), but no evidence of ventricular tachycardia on 48 hours of continuous monitoring were evaluated by programmed electrical stimulation. Thirty patients had coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, 3 had valvular heart disease, 2 had cardiomyopathy and 21 had no structural heart disease. Programmed stimulation identified two groups of subjects: Group I comprised 11 patients in whom ventricular tachycardia was induced and Group II comprised 45 patients (which included 21 patients without heart disease) in whom no ventricular tachycardia was induced. The incidence of left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 40%) was significantly higher in Group I as compared to Group II (P less than 0.001). There was, however, no difference between the grade of ventricular ectopy, HV interval or the incidence of bundle branch block between the 2 groups. Patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (Group I) were put on laboratory directed anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. Patients without inducible tachycardia (Group II) were not given anti-arrhythmic therapy. The patients were followed up for 34 +/- 10 months. The incidence of sudden death (36.3% vs 6.6%, P less than 0.001) was significantly higher in Group I as compared to Group II. No patients without structural heart disease died during the follow-up. Programmed electrical stimulation fails to induce ventricular tachycardia in patients with complex ventricular ectopy but no structural heart disease. It is, however, possible to define a high risk subset in patients with structural heart disease and complex ectopy. The high risk patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia do not seem to benefit by anti-arrhythmic drugs, which may independently increase the risk of sudden death in treated patients. Patients in whom ventricular tachycardia is not inducible have better left ventricular function, a good long-term prognosis and do not require anti-arrhythmic agents.