Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Howorka

Publications and source records attributed to K Howorka.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[A new pipet ball].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗

Failure and efficacy of insulin therapy in insulin dependent (type I) diabetic patients.

In order to determine the degree of metabolic control (HbA1c [normal less than 5.8%], mean blood glucose [MBG], glucosuria and lipids) and the prevalence of late diabetic complications in insulin-dependent diabetic patients treated by conventional insulin therapy both patients of a diabetes center (DC: n = 130; age 37.1 +/- 1.4 years) and a rural area (RA: n = 73; age 38.4 +/- 2.4 years) were examined within their local setting. Eighty such insulin-dependent diabetic patients were also taught a technique of near normal glycemic insulin substitution (NIS), which separates basal from prandial insulin replacement and instructs the patients to immediately correct self-controlled (3.8 +/- 0.1/day) aberrant blood glucose values. None of the groups on conventional insulin therapy was able to achieve satisfactory metabolic control or to avoid late diabetic complications, but rural patients were even worse off (BG 240 +/- 10 mg/dl; HbA1c 8.7 +/- 0.2% [normal: 3/73 = 4%]) than those of the DC (MBG 191 +/- 5 mg/dl; HbA1c 7.1 +/- 0.2% [normal: 27/130 = 21%]), while the prevalence of late diabetic complications was almost identical (RA/DC: neuropathy 22%/25%; retinopathy 41%/38%; macroangiopathy 15%/13%; but proteinuria 14%/5.4%). Metabolic control was improved by NIS with twice daily injections of basal (long acting) and separately of prandial (regular) insulin (total: 4.8 +/- 0.1 injections/day; MBG 130 +/- 2 mg/dl; HbA1c 5.8 +/- 0.1% [normal: 41/80 = 51%]. We conclude (1) that conventional insulin therapy just prevents metabolic catastrophe but in more than 79% of insulin-dependent diabetic patients lacks the ability to provide good metabolic control, while (2) NIS, a more physiological form of insulin therapy, improves this deplorable situation 5- to 12.4-fold.

Adult↗

Phases of functional, near-normoglycaemic insulin substitution: what are computers good for in the rehabilitation process in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus?

We have divided the rehabilitation process in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus into the following four phases. The basic phase, the so-called 'phase 0', provides information about literature, different strategies of treatment and introduces the use of regular insulin as well as blood sugar self-monitoring. During 'phase 1' (i.e. 'diabetes education common sense') all the initial information from 'phase 0' will be used practically and discussed in depth. After the patient's actual insulin need (U/24 h) has been estimated, initial algorithms for functional insulin use can be defined. And this is the turning point to 'phase 2' of the group rehabilitation process, the so-called education in functional insulin use. Initial algorithms should be understood as a preliminary answer to the patient's questions, 'What is my basal insulin need?', 'How much insulin do I need for a particular amount of carbohydrates?', and 'What is the hypothetical response of my blood glucose to a particular amount of insulin?'. These algorithms are going to be used and optimised now by the patient (under the supervision of the physician) during the so-called 'insulin games' (fasting or 24 h, experimental violation of traditional dietary rules, etc.) to demonstrate (1) how to influence actual glycaemia through immediate correction of blood sugar off blood sugar target (primary adjustment of insulin dosing), and (2) how to optimise algorithms for insulin use (secondary insulin adjustment) in future conditions of different insulin sensitivity. The 'phase 3' of individual teaching is an ongoing process of updating the patient's knowledge and practical skills.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Algorithms↗

[ISO 9001 conformity in research, teaching and rehabilitation].

Quality assurance, in particular in the areas of development and production of medical devices, is one of the tasks of biomedical engineering. The interdisciplinary working group "Functional Rehabilitation and Group Education, Vienna" is committed to the development and implementation of group education models on three levels: (1) direct education/instruction of patients with chronic diseases, (2) university research and teaching, and (3) development of technical aids for rehabilitation and the means for disseminating group education models in rehabilitation and therapy. Major aims were, by generating conformity with ISO 9001 standards, to achieve greater transparency and process optimization with very small resources in university (teaching, research, technical aids) and extra-university (rehabilitation) areas. A secondary aim was the establishment of interdisciplinary (clinical and biomedical) cooperation at university level. In all main areas (research, teaching and group education/instruction), ISO 9001-conformity was achieved by our activities on three methodological levels: (1) description and analysis of processes, (2) use of ISO 9001 standards for evaluating internal processes, and (3) optimization measures. The following article contains relevant elements of the quality manual and quality assurance system, and offers a typical example of innovative cooperation between medicine and medical engineering.

Austria↗

Diabetes care in rural area: clinical and metabolic evaluation.

To evaluate the efficacy of conventional diabetes care in a rural area, metabolic control and the presence of late complications were studied in 622 diabetic patients treated by general practitioners beyond the reach of diabetic centers. Seventy-three (12%) of the patients were classified as type I diabetics (age, 38.0 +/- 16.1 yr; duration of diabetes, 12.8 +/- 9.3 yr) and 549 as type II diabetics (age, 67.0 +/- 10.8 yr; duration of diabetes, 7.3 +/- 5.8 yr). Fifty-eight percent of type I diabetic patients administered insulin once daily and 42% twice daily, whereas most (83%) type II diabetics on insulin received only one insulin injection per day. Treatment of type II diabetic patients consisted of sulfonylureas (58%), diet alone (22%), insulin (18%), and biguanides or a combination of sulfonylurea with biguanides (2%). Poor therapeutic efficacy was observed in all patients, and postprandial hyperglycemia (blood glucose greater than 160 mg/dl) was predominant both in type I diabetics (86%) and in type II diabetics on insulin (80%) as well as off insulin (55%). HbA1c above normal (greater than 5.8%) was seen in 96% of type I and in 90 and 73% of type II diabetics with or without insulin therapy, respectively. Accompanying glucosuria was present in type I (73%) and in type II diabetics (on insulin, 71%; off insulin, 33%). Mean prevalence of late diabetic complications was greatest for insulin-treated patients (type I, type II with, and type II without insulin treatment: retinopathy, 41, 56, 22%; proteinuria, 13, 14, 3%; peripheral neuropathy, 21, 51, 12%), whereas macroangiopathy (16, 53, 31%) predominated in type II diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Australia↗