Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Hofmann

Publications and source records attributed to K Hofmann.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

Dietary manipulation of methotrexate-induced enterocolitis.

Administration of chemotherapy is limited by host toxicity, which is often manifested by severe enterocolitis. This study evaluated the effects of a liquid, elemental, chemically defined diet (ED) supplemented with 2% glutamine (Glu-ED) compared with a polypeptide diet (PPD) on the morbidity and mortality after methotrexate (MTX) administration. Fischer 344 rats (n = 80) were fed either a regular rat chow diet (RD), a 2% glycine supplemented elemental diet (Gly-ED), a 2% glutamine-supplemented elemental diet (GLU-ED), and a glycine-supplemented polypeptide diet(Gly-PPD) for 7 days prior to administration of MTX (20 mg/kg, ip). After 72 hours, eight rats per group were killed; portal vein and vena cava blood, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), liver, small intestine, and cecum were sampled for bacterial culture. Remaining animals were followed to calculate survival. One hundred percent of the Gly-PPD and 25% of the Glu-ED animals survived compared with 0% of the Gly-ED animals. Our data showed that ED resulted in an increased quantity of intestinal Gram-negative bacteria and diminished intestinal mucosal height and mucosal DNA/protein content. The polypeptide diet prevented intestinal mucosal atrophy, avoided MTX-induced enterocolitis and significantly improved animal survival compared with an elemental diet with or without glutamine supplementation.

Animals↗

Comparison of CYFRA 21-1, TPA and TPS in lung cancer, urinary bladder cancer and benign diseases.

Recently CYFRA 21-1, a new tumor marker measuring a fragment of cytokeratin 19, was introduced and proved to be suitable for therapy monitoring and follow-up of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC), in particular squamous cell carcinomas. Besides CYFRA 21-1 there are two other tumor markers, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), which also measure various cytokeratins in serum. In a retrospective study we investigated the clinical significance of these three cytokeratin markers in lung cancer and in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. For this purpose we investigated the sera of 50 healthy persons, 273 patients with various benign diseases, 218 patients with histologically proven lung cancer and 88 patients with carcinoma of the urinary bladder. In a first step the specificity was established for the different reference groups and the cutoff values were fixed at a specificity of 95%. In lung cancer the single and combined sensitivities were calculated versus benign lung diseases (n = 58) as reference group. With single determinations CYFRA 21-1 proved to have the highest sensitivity in lung cancer in general (61%), in non-small cell lung carcinomas (64%), in squamous cell carcinomas (79%), in adenocarcinomas (54%) and in large cell carcinomas (65%). In small cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) NSE was confirmed to be the marker of choice (55%). With combined determinations a clear increase in sensitivity could only be reached in large cell carcinomas (CYFRA 21-1 + TPA: 77%) and in small cell carcinomas (CYFRA 21-1 + NSE: 62%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Automation↗

Nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) in benign and malignant diseases.

Nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) is a 239 kDa internal nuclear matrix protein described to be elevated in cancer patients, especially in colorectal carcinoma and early colorectal cancers. We tested the significance of NuMA as tumour marker in colorectal cancer and also the sensitivity/specificity profile in general. Therefore, we investigated in a retrospective clinical study 507 sera from patients suffering from solid tumours, with the main emphasis on colorectal carcinoma, and 418 sera from patients with benign diseases and healthy individuals. Testing was done with a double monoclonal enzyme immunoassay detecting head and rod domain of NuMA and results were compared to the established tumour associated antigens. Based on a specificity of 95% versus the benign reference group of gastrointestinal diseases, we found--at the time of primary diagnosis--a sensitivity for colorectal cancer of 8% for NuMA, 36% for CEA and 17% for CA 19-9. Regarding T-stages of colorectal cancer no marker detected T1 when regarding 95% specificity-cut-off value but NuMA showed little more sensitivity when based on a 95% specificity cut off value versus healthy. This could not be shown in Dukes' stages. Regarding all other solid tumours tested--all based on a specificity of 95% for the corresponding benign reference groups--no advantage of NuMA in sensitivity for all other solid tumours investigated was found. No additional sensitivity could be observed. Based on our results, the NuMA-assay in its present form has no clinical relevance.

Antigens, Nuclear↗

CA 242 in comparison with established tumour markers in colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancer.

In a prospective study (N = 566) we investigated the tumour associated carbohydrate-protein CA 242, focusing on the question whether CA 242 (CaNAG, Sweden) expression in carcinoma patients is distinctly higher than in benign disorders, especially when compared to CA 19-9 (EIA Roche Germany). A second point of interest was if CA 242 is expressed to a higher extent in early stages of colorectal cancer than CEA (MEIA Abbott, USA) and CA 19-9 are, and third its behavior in pancreatic and lung cancer. We found CA 242 values comparable in healthy individuals and benign gastrointestinal disorders, thus CA 19-9 remains the marker of first choice for pancreatic cancer and CEA for colorectal cancer. CA 242 shows no advantage in lung cancer as compared to the established markers (CEA, CYFRA 21-1 (EIA Roche Germany) and NSE (EIA Hoffmann LaRoche, Switzerland) and no clearly higher expression in early colorectal cancer. Overall, the combination of CEA and CA 242 shows the best sensitivity in colorectal cancer.

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate↗

BTA-TRAK--a useful diagnostic tool in urinary bladder cancer?

During recent years the BTA-TRAK-assay (Bard Diagnostics, Redmont, USA) has been described in several investigations to be of clinical utility for patients suffering from bladder cancer. In a prospective study we investigated over four months the voided urine samples of all consecutive patients undergoing cystoscopy independent of their clinical background (n = 244) with the BTA-TRAK-assay. With a specificity of 95% for benign urological diseases (cut off: 1300 U/mL) we found a sensitivity of 13% for active bladder tumours. Using healthy individuals as a reference group (cut off: 40 U/mL) we found a sensitivity of 56% (specificity 67%). Using the cut off value recommended by the manufacturer (14 U/mL) a specificity of 54% and a sensitivity of 62% was found. For patients without relapse (NED) versus patients with active bladder tumours we got a specificity of 55% and a sensitivity of 62%. Due to an insufficient specificity and sensitivity the BTA-TRAK-test is not able to replace cystoscopy nor to improve existing diagnostic strategies in bladder cancer.

Cystoscopy↗

Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP)--a useful marker in small cell lung carcinomas.

Gastrin-releasing-peptide (GRP), the mammalian counterpart of amphibian bombesin, has been reported to be produced by cells of SCLC. Using recombinant ProGRP Yamaguchi et al developed an enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of this more stable precursor of GRP. We focused our interest on the comparability of ProGRP to neuron specific enolase (NSE), CYFRA 21-1 and CEA. For this purpose we investigated the sera of 272 patients with histologically proven carcinomas of the lung (87 SCLC, 185 NSCLC). The sera of 74 patients with benign diseases of the lung and smokers served as a reference group. At a specificity of 95% ProGRP and NSE possessed comparable sensitivities (47% versus 45%) in small cell lung carcinomas. ProGRP showed only a few more positive test results than NSE, but reached much higher value levels than NSE. ProGRP and NSE showed a clear additive sensitivity of about 20%. In NSCLC CYFRA 21-1 was the leading marker with 63% sensitivity, whereas ProGRP seldom showed a "false positive" test result. ProGRP proved a very high specificity and good sensitivity for small cell lung carcinomas and therefore enables diagnosis of small cell lung carcinoma in patients with lung tumours of unknown origin as well as good control of efficiency of therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Significance of the tumour markers CA 125 II, CA 72-4, CASA and CYFRA 21-1 in ovarian carcinoma.

We compared the tumour marker CA 72-4 and the new markers CASA and CYFRA 21-1 with the established marker CA 125II in follow-up care and control of efficacy of treatment in ovarian cancer in order to determine whether there are differences in recognizing ovarian carcinomas of different histological type. The investigation was done retrospectively on serum samples frozen at -80 degrees C obtained from 262 subjects, among them 50 healthy women, 53 sera with benign gynecological diseases and 159 sera with ovarian cancer, 72 of them at the time of primary diagnosis. We used commercially available kits: CA 125 II: Centocor RIA, CASA: Medac EIA, CA 72-4: Centocor RIA and CYFRA 21-1: Boehringer EnzymunR ELISA. Fixing specificity at 95% versus benign gynecological diseases as a clinically relevant reference group, we found cut-off values of 160 U/mL for CA 125II, 6.5 U/mL for CASA, 6.8 U/mL for CA 72-4 and 2.4 ng/ml for CYFRA 21-1. Based on this specificity we can compare the corresponding sensitivities at the time of primary diagnosis (n = 72): CA 125 II 47%, CA 72-4 47%; CASA 31% and CYFRA 21-1 44%. Regarding histological types of ovarian carcinomas, we found a sensitivity of 50% for CA 125 II and CASA, 36% for CA 72-4 and 33% for CYFRA 21-1 in serous ovarian cancer (n = 53), 21% for CA 125 II and CASA, 36% for CYFRA 21-1 and 43% for CA 72-4 for mucinous ovarian cancer (n = 27). Serous ovarian carcinomas were classified by higher FIGO-stages than mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Additional sensitivities were found at the time of primary diagnosis for the combination of CA 125 II and CA 72-4 and in serous ovarian cancer for CA 125 II and CASA. According to our results, at the time of primary diagnosis the combined determination of CA 125 II and CA 72-4 is useful. If both are negative, determination of CASA can be helpful. For follow-up care and control of efficacy of treatment the preoperative positive or leading marker is sufficient.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗

CYFRA 21-1 is not superior to SCC antigen and CEA in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

CYFRA 21-1 was compared to the most reliable tumor markers for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), SCC antigen and CEA. Sera of 163 patients with primary and 40 patients with recurrent HNSCC were examined. 94 patients with non-malignant ENT-diseases served as the control group. To give a specificity of 95% the cut-off-values were as follows: SCC: 1.9 ng/ml, CEA: 3.8 ng/ml, CYFRA 21-1: 2.9 ng/ml. SCC had the highest sensitivity at the time of primary diagnosis (P) at 43% and 61% at relapse (R), compared to CEA with P: 35%, R: 40% and CYFRA 21-1 with P: 17%, R: 18%. We show that CYFRA 21-1 cannot offer additional information to the clinical outcome of patients with HNSCC, whereas combined analysis of SCC and CEA leads to a markedly increased sensitivity of 60% at primary diagnosis and of 79% in cases of tumor relapse.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

Clinical relevance of CYFRA 21-1, TPA-IRMA and TPA-LIA-mat in urinary bladder cancer.

The sera of 154 cancer patients were analyzed at primary diagnosis before any therapy to find out the clinical importance of CYFRA 21-1 (detecting cytokeratin 19-fragments) compared with the polyclonal TPA-IRMA and the monoclonal TPA-LIA-mat-assay (both measuring fragments of cytokeratin 8, 18 and 19). The reference group consisted of 100 healthy persons as well as 78 patients with exclusively benign urological diseases. We defined the cut-off values based on 95% specificity versus benign urological disorders. For CYFRA 21-1 the cut-off value was found to be 2.5 ng/ml, for TPA-IRMA 165 U/L, and for TPA-LIA-mat 136 U/L. Taking into account all stages CYFRA 21-1 showed a sensitivity of 31% versus 20% and 16% for TPA-IRMA and TPA-LIA-mat, respectively. Considering only the muscle invasive carcinomas 52% sensitivity for CYFRA 21-1 vs. 39% and 33% for TPA-IRMA and TPA-LIA-mat could be found. All three markers correlate with the stage of disease, CYFRA 21-1 to the highest degree (stage O: 16%, stage IV: 71%). CYFRA 21-1 shows the best sensitivity-specificity-profile and seems to be a recommendable marker for the follow-up of urinary bladder cancers except for the Ta-tumors which only rarely develop into muscle invasive cancers.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗