Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K H McWeeny

Publications and source records attributed to K H McWeeny.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1986

Face-name interference.

Interference effects between the processing of simultaneously presented photographs of faces of familiar people and printed names of familiar people were investigated. Printed names interfered with identifying faces, whereas faces did not interfere with saying printed names (Experiments 1 and 3). In contrast, faces interfered more with name categorization than names interfered with face categorization (Experiments 2 and 4). Despite a priori reasons as to why faces might be thought to possess functional properties different from those of other visual objects, the observed effects are comparable to those found in object-word interference studies, with photographs of faces behaving like pictures of objects and printed people's names behaving like printed names of objects. In face naming tasks, the presence of related names produced more interference than did the presence of unrelated names (Experiment 1). This effect was examined in greater detail in Experiment 3, where we found that the effect arises when the face and the name belong to people of similar appearance. An effect of common category membership was not found in Experiment 3. Experiment 5, however, showed that names of people highly associated with the person whose face is presented also produce more interference than do names of unrelated people.

Association↗
PubMed1985

Right cerebral hemisphere superiority for constructing facial representations.

Right-handed people were asked to decide whether or not stimuli presented in the left visual hemifield (LVF) or in the right visual hemifield (RVF) were faces. Manual reaction times and error rates were recorded under three conditions. In Condition A, stimuli were line drawings of faces and moderately scrambled nonfaces made by rearranging the facial features. In Condition B, stimuli were line drawings of faces and highly scrambled nonfaces. In Condition C, stimuli were line drawings of faces and objects. The results show that faces are identified more quickly from the LVF than from the RVF in Condition A (faces vs moderately scrambled nonfaces), with no visual hemifield difference in reaction times to Condition B (faces vs highly scrambled nonfaces) and Condition C (faces vs objects). These findings are taken to indicate that both cerebral hemispheres are able to assign stimuli to the "face" category, but the right hemisphere is better than the left hemisphere at constructing facial representations. This cerebral hemisphere difference in ability to construct facial representations becomes evident when a detailed representation is required (as in Condition A).

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed1985

Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres.

Right-handed subjects were asked to decide whether or not faces presented briefly in the RVF or in the LVF were familiar (familiar faces were those of famous people). This task avoids the need for extensive semantic processing or temporary storage involved in conventional naming or identification tasks, and thus eliminates the contribution of such factors to any observed asymmetry. The resulting finding of faster reaction times to LVF faces, with no overall visual hemifield difference in error rates, is taken to indicate a right-hemisphere superiority either in the processes used to construct facial representations or in the accessing of face recognition units, or both.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.

Two experiments are reported in which subjects were asked to match a photograph of a complete face and a simultaneously presented photograph of internal or external features of a face, deciding whether or not the two photographs were pictures of the same person. In experiment 1 'same' pairs were derived from different pictures of the same face, so that subjects had to match the faces and not the particular photographs used. Matches based on internal features were found to be faster for familiar than for unfamiliar faces, whereas there was no difference in reaction time between matches based on the external features of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Faster matching of internal features of familiar faces was found to hold equally for pairs of photographs that differed in orientation of the face or in facial expression. In experiment 2 'same' pairs were derived from the same photographs, which gave subjects the choice of matching on the basis of the features of the depicted faces or matching the photographs. Reaction times were faster than in experiment 1, and there were no differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. The study confirms reports of differential saliency of the internal features of familiar faces, and shows that this only holds when stimuli are treated as faces. The finding thus reflects properties of structural rather than pictorial codes.

Face↗