Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Geoffrey White

Publications and source records attributed to K Geoffrey White.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Two experiments examined whether postsample signals of reinforcer probability or magnitude affected the accuracy of delayed matching to sample in pigeons. On each trial, red or green choice responses that matched red or green stimuli seen shortly before a variable retention interval were reinforced with wheat access. In Experiment 1, the reinforcer probability was either 0.2 or 1.0 for both red and green responses. Reinforcer probability was signaled by line or cross symbols that appeared after the sample had been presented. In Experiment 2, all correct responses were reinforced, and the signaled reinforcer durations were 1.0 s and 4.5 s. Matching was more accurate when larger or more probable reinforcers were signaled, independently of retention interval duration. Because signals were presented postsample, the effects were not the result of differential attention to the sample.

Animals↗

The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Discriminability measures such as d' and log d become infinite when performance is extremely accurate and no errors are recorded. Different arbitrary corrections can be applied to produce finite values, but how well do these values estimate true performance? To answer this question, we directly calculated the effects of a range of different corrections on the sampling distributions of d' and log d. Many arbitrary corrections produced better estimates of discriminability than did the intuitively plausible technique of rerunning problem conditions. We concluded that when it is not possible to run more trials and when other techniques are not appropriate, the best correction overall is to add a correction constant between 0.25 and 0.5 to all response counts, regardless of their value.

Behavioral Sciences↗

Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.

In two experiments, pigeons' responding on an extraneous task was explicitly reinforced during delayed matching-to-sample trials. In Experiment 1, red or green sample stimuli were followed by retention intervals of 0.2, 1, 4, or 12 sec, during which pecks to a white center key were reinforced with 2.5-sec access to wheat according to extinction, variable-interval 30-sec, and variable-interval 15-sec schedules in different conditions. A proportion of .2, .5, .7, or .9 of subsequent red or green choice responses that matched the sample were reinforced with 3-sec access to wheat. The result was that increasing center key reinforcement, or reducing reinforcer probability, lowered overall accuracy. Initial discriminability fell, but with no change in the rate of forgetting. In Experiment 2, initial discriminability was affected by extraneous reinforcers that were contingent on center key pecking, but not by noncontingent reinforcers. A plausible conclusion is that initial discriminability decreases when reinforcers strengthen competing behaviors.

Animals↗

Amount-dependent temporal discounting?

Amount-dependent temporal discounting has been demonstrated for human choice between outcomes differing in amount and delay. In the only study to date with non-humans, Grace reported no evidence for amount-dependent temporal discounting with pigeons in a concurrent-chains procedure. The present experiments repeated Grace's procedure but with modifications to enhance the discrimination between small and large magnitude outcomes. In Experiment 1, sensitivity of pigeons' initial-link choice to the terminal link delay ratio was greater with large reinforcer durations in the terminal links than with small reinforcer durations. This result is consistent with a greater rate of temporal discounting for larger reinforcers (the reverse of the result for humans), but can also be explained as enhanced discrimination of delay ratios with larger reinforcer durations. The results of a second experiment supported Grace's conclusion that amount-dependent temporal discounting does not characterize pigeons' choice in concurrent chains. Because reinforcer amount was held constant between choice alternatives in the present experiments and that of Grace, but varied in the human studies, our results question whether prior demonstrations of amount-dependent discounting reflect the effects of reinforcer delay or of reinforcer amount. Differences in the procedures used to study discounting in humans (titration procedures) and non-humans (concurrent chains) may contribute to the divergent results across species.

Animals↗

Need probability effects in animal short-term memory.

Five pigeons performed in a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) procedure with five delay durations (0.5, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 s) mixed within sessions. Contrary to the predictions of need probability theory, discriminability decreased when fewer short than long delays were included in each session. To test whether the decrease in discriminability was due to a decrease in obtained reinforcement at short delays, the number of trials at each delay was held constant and reinforcer probability was increased with increasing delay. This manipulation produced a similar decrease in discriminability as when the frequency of delays was manipulated. It was concluded that the effect of delay frequency on the forgetting function is mediated by the effect of the reinforcer distribution, which influences discriminability by weakening stimulus control.

Animals↗

Local proactive interference in delayed matching to sample: the role of reinforcement.

Discriminability in delayed matching to sample was lower when the samples on consecutive trials differed compared with when samples on consecutive trials were the same. This local proactive interference occurred when correct choices on the previous trial were reinforced but not when correct choices on the previous trial were not reinforced. When the choice on the previous trial was incorrect, discriminability was higher on different consecutive trials than on same trials. These effects were amplified by varying the ratio of reinforcers for correct choices, as predicted by a model that attributes local proactive interference to an interaction between control by the sample on the current trial and the influence of reinforcers for correct choices on previous trials.

Animals↗

Social influence in pigeons (Columba livia): the role of differential reinforcement.

Socially-influenced learning was studied in observer pigeons that observed a demonstrator in an adjacent chamber performing a target response comprising standing on a box and pecking a key 10 times. In Experiment 1 there was no evidence for social learning in the absence of reinforcement of the observer's behavior. When the target response was already established in the observer's repertoire, but was not differentially reinforced in relation to the demonstrator's behavior, rates of extinction were not influenced by the demonstrator's behavior (Experiment 2). Reinforcement of the observer's target response in the presence of the modeled target response, and not in its absence, resulted in control of the observer's responding by the behavior of the demonstrator (Experiments 3 and 4). This control was extended in Experiment 5 to deferred responses that occurred following a delay since the demonstrator's target responses. The acquisition of social influence depended on differential reinforcement of the observer's target response, with the demonstrator's target behavior serving as the explicit discriminative stimulus.

Animals↗

On the form of the forgetting function: the effects of arithmetic and logarithmic distributions of delays.

Forgetting functions with 18 delay intervals were generated for delayed matching-to-sample performance in pigeons. Delay interval variation was achieved by arranging five different sets of five delays across daily sessions. In different conditions, the delays were distributed in arithmetic or logarithmic series. There was no convincing evidence for different effects on discriminability of the distributions of different delays. The mean data were better fitted by some mathematical functions than by others, but the best-fitting functions depended on the distribution of delays. In further conditions with a fixed set of five delays, discriminability was higher with a logarithmic distribution of delays than with an arithmetic distribution. This result is consistent with the treatment of the forgetting function in terms of generalization decrement.

Animals↗

The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.

Pigeons were trained in a matching-to-sample procedure with retention intervals of 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 s mixed within each session. In different conditions, reinforcement was delayed by 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 s from correct choice responses. Discriminability decreased with increasing retention-interval duration and with increasing reinforcer delay. Exponential forgetting functions were fitted to discriminability measures plotted as a function of retention interval. Initial discriminability (intercept of the fitted functions) decreased with increasing reinforcer delay. Rate of forgetting (slope of the fitted functions) increased with reinforcer delay, suggesting an interaction between the effects of reinforcer delay and retention interval. The data were well described by multiplying an exponential function describing the effects of retention interval by a hyperbolic function describing the effect of reinforcer delay. This description included an interaction term that allowed for a greater effect of reinforcer delay at longer retention intervals.

Animals↗

Effects of methylphenidate on working memory in pigeons.

To assess the effects of methylphenidate on working memory, pigeons were trained in a delayed matching-to-sample task. Delay interval duration (0.2, 1, 3, 6, or 12 sec) was varied within sessions in order to separate delay-dependent from delay-independent effects of the drug on performance. A reduction in the sample response requirement from five responses to one response effectively reduced attention to the stimulus and impaired overall accuracy. Methylphenidate was administered in doses of 0.0 (saline control), 0.25, 2.5, and 10 mg/kg. Relative to performance with saline, accuracy was significantly reduced with 10 mg/kg methylphenidate to the same extent in both fixed ratio (FR) 1 and FR 5 conditions. The smaller doses had no effect, and there was no evidence that accuracy improved with drug administration. Intercepts and slopes of exponential functions fitted to measures of discriminability plotted as a function of delay showed that methylphenidate affected delay-independent aspects of performance (initial discriminability), but not delay-dependent aspects (rate of forgetting).

Animals↗

Temporal generalization and diffusion in forgetting.

Two processes may contribute to the decrement in discriminability with increasing temporal distance between the occasioning event and later choice. One is the length of the interval and the other is generalization decrement. In the model described by White and Wixted [J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 71 (1999) 91-113], choice was predicted by the relative payoff for correct delayed matching responses, conditional on the current value of the stimulus sampled from Thurstone-like probability distributions of the effect of the sample stimuli. In the model, discriminability decreased with increasing temporal distance because the variance of the distributions increased with time. However, White and Wixted did not specify the function relating variance to temporal distance. If a diffusion process is assumed, and if diffusion increases exponentially with time, the resulting forgetting function is a negative exponential. An additional process involves exponential generalization of remembering from one time to other times. Alternative diffusion functions result in hyperbolic or power forgetting functions. The combination of two exponential processes yields forgetting functions that are double exponential in form and which appear consistent with a wide range of data.

Journal Article↗

Demystifying wine expertise: olfactory threshold, perceptual skill and semantic memory in expert and novice wine judges.

We investigated recognition and identification of wine-relevant odours as a function of domain-specific expertise. Eleven wine experts and 11 wine novices participated in tasks measuring olfactory threshold, odour recognition, odour identification, and consistency of odour naming. Twenty-four wine-relevant odorants were sampled orthonasally by each participant in the semantic (identification; consistency of naming) and episodic (recognition) memory tasks. Results showed superior olfactory recognition by expert wine judges, despite their olfactory sensitivity and bias measures being similar to those of novices. Contrary to predictions based on reports of an association between odour memory and semantic processing, wine experts did not perform better than novices on the verbal memory tasks. Further, ability to recognize odours and ability to name odours were not positively correlated, although the novices' data showed a trend in this direction. The results imply that the source of superior odour recognition in wine experts was not enhanced semantic memory and linguistic capabilities for wine-relevant odours. One interpretation of the data is that wine experts were less susceptible than wine novices to verbal overshadowing. When forced to identify the odorants, experts' superior perceptual skills protected them from verbal interference, whereas novices' generated verbal representations of the odours were emphasized at the expense of the odorant itself. This has implications for training in wine-evaluation skills.

1-Butanol↗

Memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease: the encoding hypothesis and cholinergic function.

Forgetting functions generated by delayed matching-to-sample procedures allow delay-dependent effects to be distinguished from delay-independent effects on working memory. Parameters of negative exponential functions estimate initial discriminability (intercept) and rate of forgetting (slope). Forgetting functions for patients with Alzheimer's disease indicate that they differ from normal controls in terms of reduced initial discriminability--that is, in the encoding component of memory performance--but not convincingly in rate of forgetting. Reanalyses of previous studies with different species suggest that pro- and anticholinergic drugs influence initial discriminability in delayed matching-to-sample performance, but not rate of forgetting. The results of our reanalyses are consistent with the conclusion that the cholinergic system plays a role in the encoding component of working memory and that this is the main characteristic of the memory deficit shown by patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Aged↗