Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the central one-third of the patellar ligament.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to K G Jones.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In a consecutive series of 91 patients with 92 injured knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament was irrevocably destroyed, 79 were males; 12 were females. After a 7-year interval one male patient had surgery on his other knee. Twenty-five of the knees demonstrated isolated injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament, but the incidence of this lesion may be even greater than recorded here. The anterior cruciate ligament was repaired by a patella ligament reconstruction along with other surgical procedures when indicated. There is no acceptable alternative treatment for surgical repair, or substitution for an acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament in the young patient. In the acute or late injury, if the ligament cannot be repaired with sutures, a substitution procedure is indicated. In 92 knees, including 2 revisions, 9 patients were followed for too short a period to warrant evaluation. In 83 knees, the results were: 59 good; 18 fair; 6 poor. The following 5 surgical complications were encountered: 2 wound infections, 2 poorly placed bone plugs, and one ligament was pinched in the intercondylar notch. Until a more satisfactory technique for substitution for a destroyed anterior cruciate ligament is available, the patellar tendon repair procedure is bound to continue to be a useful as well as relatively simple operation.
The patients selected for this modification of the Roger Anderson device are few, because the method is intended for unstable fractures of the distal radius. Extensive disabling stiffening of the wrist and hand encountered following prolonged immobilization by rigid distraction methods can be avoided or greatly reduced by this simple modification of the method. This modification of the extraskeletal fixation should prove to be superior to rigid distraction when early decompression of the carpal tunnel is indicated.