Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K G Faulkner

Publications and source records attributed to K G Faulkner.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture.

The hip axis length has been shown in previous studies to be predictive of hip fracture independent of age and femoral bone density. The first studies of hip axis length were performed by manual measurement of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan printouts. In this study, an automated analysis procedure is defined using software tools provided by the DXA manufacturer. Manual and automatic hip axis length measurements in 198 women were highly correlated (r = 0.98). Because of scaling factors of the printout, the automatic measurement was 58% longer than the manual value. Precision of the automatic measurement, based upon triplicate DXA scans of 33 women, was 0.07 cm or 0.68%. To define normative data, the hip axis length was measured from femoral DXA scans of 471 female volunteers aged 40-92 scanned on 14 different Hologic QDR-1000 systems. Mean hip axis length was 10.5 cm, with a standard deviation of 0.62 cm. No significant relationship between hip axis length and age was found (r = 0.07, P = 0.15). Based on previously reported odds ratios corrected for femoral bone density, age, height, and weight, an automatic hip axis length measurement of 11.0 cm is associated with a twofold increase in hip fracture risk compared with a woman with an average hip axis length. A hip axis length value of 11.6 cm increases hip fracture risk by a factor of 4 compared with a woman with a normal hip dimension. We conclude that the hip axis length can be easily incorporated into existing DXA hip analysis software in combination with a bone density measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1994

Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

The comparison of patient data among different dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners is complicated because no universally accepted cross-calibration procedure or standard currently exists. This study was performed under the auspices of the International DXA Standardization Committee to establish appropriate cross-calibration parameters. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine measurements of 100 women, ages 20-80 years (mean 52.6 +/- 16, range of BMD = 0.4-1.6 g/cm2) were obtained on a Norland XR26 Mark II, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer using standard procedures (pencil beam mode for all three scanners). Area, BMC, and BMD results from the different scanners were compared for all patients. In addition, the European spine phantom (ESP) and the European spine phantom prototype (ESP prototype), as well as standard phantoms from all three manufacturers, were evaluated on the three systems. To achieve universal scanner calibration, we used the intercept and slope of the patient's correlations and the value of the middle vertebra of the ESP as a reference point in a series of standardization formulas, and we have expressed the results as sBMD (mg/cm2). The correlations of the patients' spinal BMD values were excellent for each of the three scanner pairs. The average absolute difference in patient spinal BMD values (L2-4) between Hologic and Norland was 0.012 g/cm2 (1.3%); it was 0.113 g/cm2 (11.7%) between Hologic and Lunar and 0.118 g/cm2 (12.2%) between Norland and Lunar. The phantoms' regression lines approximated those of the patient regression lines, and the phantoms with only one measurement point were very close to the patients' regression lines. After applying the standardization formulas, the average absolute differences for the 100 patients were 28 mg/cm2 (2.7%) for Hologic/Norland, 23 mg/cm2 (2.2%) for Hologic/Lunar, and 29 mg/cm2 (2.8%) for Norland/Lunar. Average BMD results for the patients before correction were 0.972 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1.100 g/cm2 for Lunar, and 0.969 g/cm2 for Norland. After correction, sBMD results for patients were 1045 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1047 mg/cm2 for Lunar, and 1043 mg/cm2 for Norland. The standardization approach as performed in our study provided compatibility of DXA results obtained on different scanners.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1994

Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Though spinal and femoral measurements are typically preferred for evaluating skeletal density, an abundance of forearm data exists, primarily from single photon absorptiometry (SPA) devices. Most dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners are capable of scanning the forearm and provide analysis tools to duplicate conventional SPA measurements. In this study, we have compared the radius density measurements from three commonly available densitometers: a Norland 278 SPA, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic 1000/W. Radius bone mineral density (BMD) on the nondominant forearm was measured in 28 volunteers (21 women and 7 men) aged 24-78, with an average age of 51 +/- 17 years. Values were compared and regression relationships derived at corresponding measurement sites. SPA and DXA BMD values were found to be highly correlated (r = 0.99) with small standard errors (0.014 g/cm2-0.021 g/cm2), though significant absolute differences were observed at most measurement regions. Correlation slopes ranged from 0.85 to 1.04, with intercepts from 0.01 to 0.08 g/cm2. Using the resultant regression equations, SPA BMD values can be converted to DXA values with an expected error of roughly 3%. DXA BMD can also be interconverted between Lunar and Hologic with a similar expected error. In situations where this level of imprecision is acceptable, patient forearm measurements obtained on different systems can be interconverted.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1994

Racial differences in hip axis lengths might explain racial differences in rates of hip fracture. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Compared with white women, Asian women have about a 40%-50% and blacks a 50%-60% lower risk of hip fracture, but the reason for this racial difference is not known. Women with a shorter hip axis have a lower risk of hip fracture. To test the hypothesis that a shorter hip axis length could account for the lower risk of hip fracture among Asian and black women, we measured hip axis length in 135 Caucasian, 74 Asian and 50 black women. The mean hip axis lengths of Asian and black women were significantly shorter (1.2 and 0.7 standard deviations, respectively) than that of the whites (p < 0.0001). We estimate that, compared with white women, Asians would have a 47% lower risk (95% confidence interval: 32%-63%) and blacks would have a 32% (15%-45%) lower risk of hip fracture because of their shorter hip axis. We conclude that a shorter hip axis length might be a major factor accounting for Asian women's lower risk of hip fracture and might contribute to the lower risk in black women.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites.

To assess the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel for osteoporosis screening, we studied a group of 170 early postmenopausal women using both QUS of the heel and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, forearm, and whole body. On the basis of the linear regression results between QUS and DXA, a 95% bone mineral density (BMD) estimate confidence range was defined. Correlation coefficients between the QUS measurements and DXA ranged from 0.26 to 0.63. The confidence ranges for the estimated BMD based on a QUS measurement of the heel were large, such that an estimation of skeletal BMD at any of the DXA sites measured was not possible. For example, an estimate of the normative anteroposterior spine BMD (i.e. the T-score or the Z-score) based on a calcaneal ultrasound reading would have an error of +/- 1.9 standard deviations. Results for predicting the normative BMD of the other DXA regions were similar, with expected errors ranging from +/- 1.4 to +/- 2.0 standard deviations. We therefore conclude that QUS is not suited for the screening of early postmenopausal women for low axial or peripheral BMD. However, QUS may have a role as an independent predictor of fracture by measuring skeletal properties in addition to bone density.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Based on engineering principles, geometric measurements of femoral size should be related to femoral strength and the risk for hip fracture. To evaluate whether a simple measurement of femoral geometry is associated with hip fracture risk, we obtained dual x-ray absorptiometry scans of the proximal femur on 8074 white women age 67 or older. During an average of 1.6 years of follow-up, 64 participants suffered hip fractures. In all fracture cases and in a random sample of 134 women who did not subsequently suffer a hip fracture, we measured hip axis length (the distance from greater trochanter to inner pelvic brim), neck width, and the neck/shaft angle on the scan printout, with the observer blinded to subsequent fracture status of the participant. Results were analyzed using multiple logistic models, and odds ratios were determined. After adjustment for age, each standard deviation decrease in femoral neck bone mineral density increased hip fracture risk 2.7-fold (95% confidence interval 1.7, 4.3), and each standard deviation increase in hip axis length nearly doubled the risk of hip fracture (odds ratio = 1.8; 95% CI 1.3, 2.5). The relationship between hip axis length and fracture risk persisted even after adjustment for age, femoral neck density, height, and weight. A longer hip axis length was associated with an increased risk of both femoral neck (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.3, 3.0) and trochanteric fractures (1.6; 1.0, 2.4). We found no significant association between the neck width (1.1; 0.8, 1.5) or the neck/shaft angle (1.4; 0.9, 2.2) and risk of hip fracture.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.

In this study, the cross-calibration of a fan beam DXA system (Hologic QDR-2000) to a pencil beam scanner from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR-1000/W) is described. The scanners were calibrated by the manufacturer using the same anthropomorphic spine phantom at installation. To verify consistent machine calibration, a group of 69 female subjects, aged 46-75, had anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur scans on the QDR-1000/W followed by pencil and array scans of the same sites on the QDR-2000 during the same visit. Many of the subjects had bilateral examinations of the proximal femur for a total of 123 hip scans. Pencil and array area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) from the QDR-2000 were compared with the values obtained on the QDR-1000/W, and linear regression equations were derived for relating the two instruments. At the spine, no differences were found between the QDR-1000/W BMD values and the QDR-2000 array BMD values. A slight difference between pencil beam modes was detected but was not deemed clinically significant. Linear regression models relating the QDR-2000 and QDR-1000/W AP spine BMD measurements showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.99, with slopes of 1.00, intercepts equivalent to zero, and small root mean square errors. Comparisons at the proximal femur showed equivalency at the femoral neck and trochanter regions for the two machines in pencil mode, but slight increases in BMC and BMD at the other femoral sites on the QDR-2000 in both pencil and array mode. Correlation coefficients were 0.97-0.99 for all measurement regions except for Ward's.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1993

Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data.

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been shown to be a precise and sensitive method for evaluating spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and skeletal response to aging and therapy. Precise and accurate determination of BMD using QCT requires a calibration standard to compensate for and reduce the effects of beam-hardening artifacts and scanner drift. The first standards were based on dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) solutions. Recently, several manufacturers have developed stable solid calibration standards based on calcium hydroxyapatite (CHA) in water-equivalent plastic. Due to differences in attenuating properties of the liquid and solid standards, the calibrated BMD values obtained with each system do not agree. In order to compare and interpret the results obtained on both systems, cross-calibration measurements were performed in phantoms and patients using the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) liquid standard and the Image Analysis (IA) solid standard on the UCSF GE 9800 CT scanner. From the phantom measurements, a highly linear relationship was found between the liquid- and solid-calibrated BMD values. No influence on the cross-calibration due to simulated variations in body size or vertebral fat content was seen, though a significant difference in the cross-calibration was observed between scans acquired at 80 and 140 kVp. From the patient measurements, a linear relationship between the liquid (UCSF) and solid (IA) calibrated values was derived for GE 9800 CT scanners at 80 kVp (IA = [1.15 x UCSF] - 7.32).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact.

A concept for quality assurance (QA) in bone densitometry has been developed for clinical multicenter studies. Major elements provided by a coordinating center comprise (1) consulting services and certification of participating centers in the start-up phase of the study, (2) review of scan data acquired on QA standards for cross-calibration and longitudinal assessment of scanner stability, (3) review of selected patient data as well as of problem cases during the study, and (4) comprehensive review and correction of patient results based on QA data after conclusion of the study. Limitations of phantom-based QA data should be acknowledged. Typical problems encountered during research studies and guidelines for solutions are presented. Successful implementation of QA measures may yield substantial enhancement of statistical power. Depending on the study design and the variability of response within patient groups, improvement in precision due to QA measures may reduce the smallest detectable difference between subject groups or, alternatively, sample size by a few to more than 50%, and thus may contribute to a substantial reduction in study cost. Formulae for calculation of the magnitude of these effects are presented. To maximize the net benefit, QA efforts have to be limited to levels that assure reliability of the data at acceptable QA cost. While QA programs at individual clinical sites or for local practitioners may not need to be as extensive as for multicenter clinical trials, awareness of the potential problems and implementation of basic QA measures will help in obtaining high-quality bone densitometry results.

Bone Density↗
PubMed1993

[Osteoporosis diagnosis by broad-band ultrasound attenuation (BUA): its correlation with established measurement procedures of bone densitometry].

Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) measurements of the os calcis of 54 women were correlated to single-energy x-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the os calcis, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine, age and weight. The reproducibility of the BUA measurements was 2.1%. BUA was significantly correlated with SXA (r = 0.7), DXA (r = 0.5) and age (r = 0.6). BUA values ranged from 42 to 117 dB/MHz. Our results confirm BUA's potential as a simple, inexpensive, radiation free, and precise alternative technique for osteoporosis diagnostics of the os calcis. However, the correlation observed with bone mineral density of the spine is too weak to use BUA for predicting the lumbar density status. The ability of BUA to predict the risk of osteoporotic fractures has to be determined directly by assessing the association of BUA and the prevalence or preferably the incidence of fractures.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1992

Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

Because of the differences in the interactions of ultrasound and x-ray waves with bone, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques may yield information about skeletal status not accessible by regular bone densitometry (BD) techniques. However, relatively strong correlations have been reported between broad-band ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and several x-ray-based BD methods. We assessed the precision and association of single x-ray absorptiometry (SXA) and BUA of the calcaneus. We examined both BUA and SXA at the calcaneus using special software for matching the regions of interest. An algorithm was derived and applied to correct the observed correlation coefficients for the attenuation effect caused by the precision errors for BUA and SXA. In a group of 33 volunteers covering a wide range of age and calcaneal bone mineral densities, the site-matched and precision-adjusted correlation coefficient between BUA and SXA was r = 0.58, with a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 14.41 dB/MHz, or 17.08%. For the subgroup of 25 women the correlation was stronger, with r = 0.72 and SEE = 11.53 dB/MHz, or 14.33%. SXA precision was 0.79% for the regular region of interest (ROI) and 1.22% for the site-matched ROI. BUA precision was 2.76% for the entire subject group and 1.63% for women of age 40 or older. The observed correlation coefficient between ultrasound and x-ray based techniques of the order of 0.7 is significant, but it leaves about 50% of the variability unexplained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗