Searching for satisfaction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to K Dracup.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare three different methods of teaching CPR to parents of infants at high risk for sudden cardiopulmonary arrest and to identify characteristics that predict difficulty in learning CPR. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter clinical trial of 480 parents and other infant caretakers. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 CPR training protocols: an instructor-taught CPR class, an instructor-taught CPR class followed by a social support intervention, or a self-training video module. CPR proficiency was evaluated with the use of a CPR skills checklist. RESULTS: Of 480 subjects, 301 (63%) were able to demonstrate successful CPR after training. Univariate analysis revealed that unsuccessful learners were likely to be less educated, to have lower incomes, to never have attended a previous CPR class, and to have better psychosocial adjustment to their infant's illness, compared with successful learners. The proportion of successful learners was significantly higher in the 2 instructor-taught classes than in the self-training video class. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to develop a predictive profile to describe unsuccessful learners. The following characteristics independently predicted unsuccessful learners: CPR learned in the self-training video group, fewer years of education, and better psychosocial adjustment. CONCLUSION: Most parents of infants at high risk for sudden death can demonstrate successful CPR skills at the completion of 1 class. However, a significant minority will require extra attention to be successful. Self-training video instruction may not be an adequate substitute for instructor-taught CPR.
This article is a personal reflection on a long career in cardiovascular nursing. The author focuses on some of the lessons learned and on individuals pivotal to her learning. Major lessons relate to managing stress by maintaining a sense of perspective in the face of minor frustrations, creating significance from seemingly insignificant interactions and situations, and making career decisions that are based on personal as well as monetary rewards. She also discusses the satisfaction of developing expertise in a health care specialty and the importance of finding clinical mentors. Finally, she reflects on the challenges and rewards of teaching.
Recovery from heart failure and coping with the effects of this serious condition has a major impact on the self-care demand of patients with heart failure. To prevent potential self-care deficits, education and support are important issues in nursing care. The purpose of this article is to describe the development of a supportive-educative program that is designed to enhance self-care abilities of patients with heart failure. To structure nursing care for these patients and their families in a consistent systematized way, Orem's general theory of nursing is used as a frame of reference.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Physicians and other health care professionals play an important role in reducing the delay to treatment in patients who have an evolving acute myocardial infarction. A multidisciplinary working group has been convened by the National Heart Attack Alert Program (which is coordinated by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health) to address this concern. The working group's recommendations target specific groups of patients: those who are known to have coronary heart disease, atherosclerotic disease of the aorta or peripheral arteries, or cerebrovascular disease. The risk for acute myocardial infarction or death in such patients is five to seven times greater than that in the general population. The working group recommends that these high-risk patients be clearly informed about symptoms that they might have during a coronary occlusion, steps that they should take, the importance of contacting emergency medical services, the need to report to an appropriate facility quickly, treatment options that are available if they present early, and rewards of early treatment in terms of improved quality of life. These instructions should be reviewed frequently and reinforced with appropriate written material, and patients should be encouraged to have a plan and to rehearse it periodically. Because of the important role of the bystander in increasing or decreasing delay to treatment, family members and significant others should be included in all instruction. Finally, physicians' offices and clinics should devise systems to quickly assess patients who telephone or present with symptoms of a possible acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: To examine delay in seeking treatment among patients with an evolving acute myocardial infarction (MI), and to identify factors which contributed to this delay. DESIGN: Patient interview combined with medical record review. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 317 patients with confirmed diagnosis of acute MI interviewed within 72 hours of admission to three hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delay from onset of symptoms to arrival at hospital, and cognitive, emotional, sociodemographic and clinical factors which contributed to increased prehospital delay. RESULTS: Median prehospital delay was 6.4 hours; 41% of patients delayed less than four hours, while 28% delayed less than two hours. Prehospital delay was increased in patients with fewer years of education (P = 0.001), lower income (P = 0.003) and transportation to the hospital by private car rather than ambulance (P = 0.02). Delay time was increased by several cognitive and emotional processes (P < 0.001), such as waiting to see if symptoms would go away, being too embarrassed to ask for assistance, and not recognising the importance of symptoms. Delay time was increased with heartburn, breathlessness or intermittent symptoms and decreased with sweating and dizziness (P < 0.05). Independent predictors of increased prehospital time (P < or = 0.01) were fewer than 10 years of education, not wanting to trouble anyone, failing to recognize the symptoms of delay, and the intermittent nature of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Over 50% of acute MI patients delay seeking treatment by six hours or more. Many factors related to cognitive and social processes that contribute to this delay may be remediable with appropriate patient and community education.
Nurses in different settings are involved in caring for patients with heart failure. In the clinic, hospital, nursing home or patients' home, the nurse has a role in detecting, identifying and treating heart failure. In order to provide optimal care, literature on possible and effective interventions should be available to nurses. This study gives an overview of nursing care for patients with heart failure as described in practice, literature and standard nursing care plans. Based on interviews of 45 nurses, a review of all pertinent literature published between 1983 and 1993 and a review of standard nursing care plans used in the Netherlands to care for patients with heart failure, four composite themes emerged; namely, basic nursing care, assessment and observation, symptom-relieving interventions, and patient education. Caring for patients with heart failure is very complex and is often aimed at keeping a very delicate balance between, e.g. rest and activity, fluid intake and elimination, and therapeutic cost and benefit. Treatment strategies for optimizing care for these patients are described.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine psychological consequences of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to family members of patients at risk for sudden death. METHODS: Patient-family pairs (n = 337) were randomized into one of four groups: control, CPR only, CPR with cardiac risk factor education, and CPR with a social support intervention. Only family members received CPR training. Data on emotional state and psychosocial adjustment to illness were collected at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 and 6 months following CPR training. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the emotional states of family members across the four groups. However, significant differences in psychosocial adjustment and emotional states occurred in patients across treatment groups following CPR training. Patients whose family members learned CPR with the social support intervention reported better psychosocial adjustment and less anxiety and hostility than patients in the other groups. Control patients reported better psychosocial adjustment and less emotional distress than patients in the CPR-only and CPR-education groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support tailoring family CPR training so that instruction does not result in negative psychological states in patients. The findings also illustrate the efficacy of a simple intervention that combines CPR training with social support.
BACKGROUND: Advanced heart failure is characterized by activation of the sympathetic nervous system and intense vasoconstriction. Biofeedback-relaxation techniques have been used successfully to treat conditions with similar pathophysiological features. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if conscious control of skin temperature via a biofeedback-relaxation technique could produce vasodilation and alter central hemodynamic status and circulating levels of catecholamines in patients with heart failure. METHODS: Forty patients with advanced heart failure were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. The study was done in a special cardiac step-down unit accepting patients for hemodynamic monitoring. The patients in the intervention group had one session of skin-temperature biofeedback augmented by imagery of hand warmth and modified progressive muscle relaxation. Skin temperature, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac output, plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine, oxygen consumption, respiratory rate, and pulmonary wedge pressure were measured before and after the biofeedback session. Control patients had the same measurements made but were not given instruction in biofeedback-relaxation techniques. RESULTS: Patients in the biofeedback-relaxation and control groups had comparable clinical profiles at baseline. Patients undergoing biofeedback-relaxation showed the following changes: (1) increase in skin temperature of 3.1 +/- 2.8 degrees F (1.7 +/- 1.5 degrees C) in the finger and 1.5 +/- 5.2 degrees F (0.4 +/- 1.2 degrees C) in the foot, (2) increase in cardiac output of 0.30 +/- 0.33 L/min, (3) decrease in systemic vascular resistance of 152 +/- 225 dyne.sec.cm-5, and (4) decrease in respiratory rate of 4.5 +/- 3.2 breaths per minute. The biofeedback group exhibited no changes in catecholamine levels or oxygen consumption. No changes in any of these parameters were seen in the control group. DISCUSSION: Despite the presence of marked vasoconstriction in patients with advanced heart failure, a single session of biofeedback-relaxation can increase finger temperature and cardiac output and decrease systemic vascular resistance and respiratory rate, apparently without effect on systemic levels of catecholamines or oxygen consumption.