Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Bunch

Publications and source records attributed to K Bunch.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Cardiac transplantation in childhood cancer survivors in Great Britain.

The aim of this study was to identify patients treated in Great Britain for childhood cancer and subsequently referred for cardiopulmonary transplantation in order to assess diagnosis, cancer treatment, management and outcome. Computerised record linkage between the National Registry of Childhood Tumours and the national transplant database held and maintained by the United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA) was used to identify patients. Verification and clinical details were then obtained from the oncology and transplant centres. 16 patients were identified from the 31992 cases of childhood malignancy diagnosed in Britain since 1970. These comprised 13 heart transplants, 2 heart/lung transplants and 1 patient who died while on the heart transplantation waiting list. All 14 potential heart transplant patients had cardiomyopathy presumed secondary to anthracycline therapy. The original diagnoses were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (3), Wilms' tumour (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (2) and one each of five different solid tumours. Median age at diagnosis was 44 months (range 4-165 months). Median anthracycline dose was 413 mg/m2 (range 240-680 mg/m2). 13 of the 14 potential cardiac transplantation patients were more than 2 years from end of their cancer treatment before requiring transplantation and the transplantation was performed 2-126 months after onset of cardiac failure at a median age of 163 months. Five year actuarial survival from transplantation was 74%. There was no recurrence of the original malignancy in any of these patients. Both heart/lung patients died, 3 and 11 months after the transplant. These heart transplantation data suggest that, in Britain, survival compares favourably with that of patients whose heart transplant was required for other causes of cardiomyopathy. This indicates that patients successfully treated for childhood cancer should not be excluded from transplant programmes.

Adolescent↗

Does nose blowing improve hearing in serous otitis? A community study.

Otitis media with serous effusion (glue ear) is one of the most common problems seen by family doctors. In order to evaluate the effect of regular nose blowing on the resolution of serous otitis a randomized trial was carried out in a community health audiology department in Oxfordshire over the period 1983-87. A total of 84 children aged three and a half to four and a half years, found to have a conductive hearing loss owing to serous otitis were included in the study. The hearing test combined a discrimination test of seven named toys and full audiometry with earphones. The children's ears were examined by otoscope and Rinne's tuning fork test was performed. Randomly selected children were advised to blow their noses or were given no advice. The children were retested two months later and the outcome determined for children who were or were not given advice and who were or were not naturally good nose blowers. A record was made of any surgical intervention by insertion of ventilating tubes carried out before the children started school and of the results of the children's routine hearing tests on school entry. No significant differences in the proportion of children passing the second hearing test were found between children advised to blow their noses and those given no advice or between those children who were naturally good at nose blowing and those who were not. Neither was there any association between the proportion of children passing the school audiometry test and nose blowing advice being given, nose blowing ability or surgical intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Child, Preschool↗

Decontamination.

The soil encountered in the cleaning and decontamination process is protein in nature and relatively difficult to remove, especially if the protein has been allowed to dry on the surface. However, removal of this soil prior to sterilization is necessary in order to achieve satisfactory results--the lower the bioburden, the greater the probability of actually achieving sterilization. Therefore, when cleaning is done thoroughly and properly, visible soil and film and most microorganisms and pyrogens will be removed from the surface of the item. By providing instruments and other patient care equipment that are safe to handle or that have been adequately prepared for sterilization, you can be confident that you have made a major contribution to the provision of quality patient care in your hospital.

Central Supply, Hospital↗