Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K B Franklin

Publications and source records attributed to K B Franklin.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Self-stimulation and circling reveal functional differences between medial and lateral substantia nigra.

Functional differences between medial and lateral substantia nigra (SN) sites mediating intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and circling behaviours were explored. It was found that, for medial SN stimulation sites, D- and L-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) had equipotent, slightly facilitatory effects on ICSS rates while for lateral SN stimulation sites, D-amphetamine increased and L-amphetamine decreased ICSS rates. It is suggested that these effects may be due to medial and lateral dopamine cells having different sensitivities to amphetamine isomers. Imposed continuous stimulation of the ICSS sites induced contralateral circling from the medial SN placements and ipsilateral circling from the lateral SN placements. In rats receiving lesions through the ICSS electrode, D-amphetamine (2 mg/kg) induced ipsilateral circling following medial SN damage and contralateral circling after lateral SN damage. These results suggest that lateral and medial SN mechanisms of ICSS and circling differ, and that the lateral SN may be antagonistic to medial SN mechanisms involved in circling behaviour.

Amphetamine↗

Apparent lack of tolerance in the formalin test suggests different mechanisms for morphine analgesia in different types of pain.

Tolerance to morphine analgesia was examined using the Formalin test in which pain lasting about 2 hrs associated with minor tissue injury is produced by subcutaneous injection of dilute Formalin. To distinguish behavioral from pharmacological tolerance, different groups of rats received their daily morphine injection (7 mg/kg) in the test environment or in their home environment for 5 days. Another group of rats was given morphine for 15 days in the home cage followed by 5 days in the test environment. None of the morphine injected groups differed from saline injected control groups in the amount of analgesia. These findings add to previous evidence that the Formalin test measures a type of pain which is different from that assessed in withdrawal reflex tests, and which more closely resembles clinical pain in man. Moreover, the fact that analgesia in the Formalin test shows little tolerance while analgesia in withdrawal tests shows rapid tolerance suggests that the underlying neural mechanisms are different.

Animals↗

5HT blockade and the stimulant effects of D- and L-amphetamine: no interaction in self-stimulation of prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, or dorsal tegmentum. unexpected lethality in hippocampal sites.

We investigated the role of serotonin in the differential stimulatory effects of D- and L-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and on self-stimulation (SS) in rats. The serotonin antagonist methysergide (12.5 mg/kg) had no effects alone on activity or on SS. Methysergide enhanced the strong locomotor stimulatory effects of D-amphetamine and the weaker effects of L-amphetamine. D-amphetamine facilitated SS more strongly than L- in hypothalamic, dorsal tegmental, hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortical sites, but the effect of D-amphetamine was much weaker in prefrontal cortex than in other sites. Methysergide did not alter the effects of D- or L-amphetamine in any site except the hippocampus. Here, methysergide plus L-amphetamine suppressed SS; methysergide plus D-amphetamine suppressed SS in some rats and greatly increased it in others. When SS was facilitated by D-amphetamine plus methysergide, the combination was lethal. The possibility that lethality was due to adrenal crisis is discussed.

Amphetamine↗

Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.

Rats stopped responding for electrical stimulation of the brain following pretreatment with the dopamine antagonist pimozide, as well as following truncation of brain stimulation trains. In either case the extinguished responding was temporarily reinstated on presentation of a light if the light had previously signalled reward but not if the light had had no such significance. These results indicate that pimozide reduces self-stimulation by abolishing the rewarding effect of brain stimulation rather than by interfering with motor ability.

Animals↗

Presynaptic alpha-adenoceptors: the depression of self-stimulation by clonidine and its restoration by piperoxane but not by phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine.

Depression of self-stimulation by clonidine has been ascribed to continuous direct stimulation of alpha-adrenoceptors with consequent disruption of reinforcement signals thought to be conveyed by noradrenergic pathways. This suggestion was tested by administration of alpha-receptor blocking agents (piperoxane, phentolamine and phenoxybenzamine, PBZ) differing in their affinity for pre- and post-synaptic receptor sites. Piperoxane in low doses (0.55-5.0 mg/kg) previously reported to cause specific blockade of pre-synaptic receptors implicated in negative feedback circuits, caused a significant increase in self-stimulation rate and strongly antagonized the depression of self-stimulation by clonidine (0.15 mg/kg). A larger dose of piperoxane (45 mg/kg) and graded doses of phentolamine and PBZ, affecting both pre- and post-synaptic receptors, depressed self-stimulation, and did not antagonize clonidine-induced depression of self-stimulation. It is concluded that depression of self-stimulation by clonidine may depend on clonidine-induced inhibition of NA release exerted via presynaptic receptors, and that the effect of clonidine is not necessarily evidence that noncontingent adrenergic stimulation disrupts reinforcement.

Animals↗

Catecholamines and self-stimulation: evidence suggesting a reinforcing role for noradrenaline and a motivating role for dopamine.

Investigation of the role of noradrenaline (NA) and dopamine (DA) in self-stimulation showed that d-amphetamine (which releases more DA than does l-amphetamine, but not more NA) was much more effective than l-amphetamine in enhancing self-stimulation of NA sites in the locus coeruleus and near-lateral hypothalamus. In DA sites in the substantia nigra and far-lateral hypothalamus the effects of the 2 isomers were confirmed to be more nearly equal. Thymoxamine HCl (10 mg/kg IP), a specific alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker, depressed self-stimulation at all sites, but significantly more severely at DA sites. Thus the drugs most effective in influencing self-stimulation at a particular site were those acting predominantly on the unstimulated system. These findings were interpreted in terms of a hypothesis that DA and NA play complementary roles in self-stimulation and that both are essential; or, more specifically, that DA pathways, implicated in other motivational activites, contribute to a state of drive or arousal necessary for self-stimulation; while response-contingent noradrenergic activity (elicited by the electrodes directly via a transsynaptic route) mediates reinforcement. Further predictions from this hypothesis were tested as follows: (1) Direct pharmacological stimulants of adrenergic alpha-receptors should disrupt self-stimulation by acting randomly on the reinforcement system and disrupting response-reward contingencies; this was confirmed by the finding that the alpha-receptor stimulant clonidine HCl (0.05 mg/kg) depressed self-stimulation at all sites tested. (2) Drect stimulants of DA receptors should enhance self-stimulation of NA sites by augmenting dopaminergic motivational activity; but in rats with DA electrodes, noncontingent stimulation of DA receptors would also impose similar noncontingent activity on the transsynaptic noradrenergic reinforcement pathways and thus depress self-stimulation; this was confirmed by the finding that apomorphine (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) was strongly stimulant for NA electrodes but strongly depressant for DA electrodes, and that the degree and direction of these effects was highly correlated with the differential effects of d- l-amphetamine (rho = .65, p less than 0.01). Neither effect of apomorphine depended on the occurrence of motor stereotypy. These results can be interpreted in terms of 2-component models for self-stimulation, with the predominant transmitter of the drive component being identified as DA and that g the reinforcing component as NA.

Amphetamine↗

Self-stimulation and noradrenaline: evidence that inhibition of synthesis abolishes responding only if the "reserve" pool is dispersed first.

Although noradrenaline (NA) is thought to play a critical role in electrical self-stimulation, suppression of NA synthesis by injection of the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase inhibitor, FLA-63 (Hässle) (25 mg/kg), had little or no effect on response rates. But 3 or 5 days after prior reserpinisation, FLA-63 in the same dosage suppressed or profoundly depressed self-stimulation without eliciting signs of general incapacity. Suppression of self-stimulation could be reversed by intraventricular injection of NA, indicating that the depressant effect depended specifically on NA depletion. These findings support the view that NA may play a necessary role in self-stimulation and indicate that the NA available for this purpose included intraneuronal NA in a reserpine-sensitive reserve pool.

Animals↗