Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K A Atchison

Publications and source records attributed to K A Atchison.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Change in mandibular trabecular pattern and hip fracture rate in elderly women.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if alterations of trabecular pattern, or the rate of change of jaw trabeculae, are associated with rate of hip fracture. METHODS: Participants in a population-based study of residents of a California retirement community (Leisure World Cohort Study) were asked for permission to obtain their dental radiographs. Periapical radiographs were retrieved on 598 women (average age at time of first radiograph=77 years). Several measurements of trabecular pattern (strut analysis), textural properties (run-length analysis) and Fourier analysis were made in several anatomical regions of the jaw. These trabecular features and clinical information self-reported by subjects in the early 1980s were examined for association with hip fracture rate using Cox proportional-hazard regression. RESULTS: Rate of hip fracture increased with decreasing average length of node-to-terminus struts in the mandibular incisor region. Each 0.01 mm per year decrease in the average length of node-to-terminus struts increased hip fracture rate by a factor of 2.9 (P=0.02, accuracy=73%). Inclusion of clinical parameters improved the predictive model compared with use of the radiographic parameter alone (accuracy=79%). Similar results were seen for percent change per year in this parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in radiographic trabecular structure, augmented with clinical information, are predictive of hip fracture in elderly women. Further refinement of both the radiographic and clinical parameters may lead to a screening process accessible to a large number of women and to early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Using information technology and community-based research to improve the dental health-care system.

It is commonly acknowledged that the United States' health-care system produces some of the finest care in the world for some people but fails to meet the needs of others. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued six aims for a redesigned health-care system, that it be: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. The purpose of this paper is to use an ongoing community-based study to illustrate current problems in the provision of oral health services that could be addressed through information technology. Appropriate use of information technology can assist dental schools and clinics in community-based clinical outcomes research needed to assemble the evidence base for improving oral health care. This conference serves as an important steppingstone to establish a means for information technology to improve the community's oral health.

California↗
PubMed2000

Demonstrating successful aging using the International Collaborative Study for Oral Health Outcomes.

As the lifespan increases and people are faced with 15 to 20 years of "old age," we ask what one considers successful aging with respect to oral health. We propose a comprehensive combination of outcome variables, maintenance of teeth, manageable periodontal condition, positive perceived oral health, satisfaction with their access to and receipt of dental services, and minimal functional problems, that together comprise a definition of successful aging. The International Collaborative Study for Oral Health Outcomes provides a data set for exploring the oral health of a diverse sample of older adults in US and international sites using the modified Andersen Behavioral Model. The percent of adults who report no natural teeth ranged from 16 percent in San Antonio to 59 percent in New Zealand. Seventy percent or more of the adults from each site rated their oral health as good/fair or better except in Poland. The current cohort of older adults is faring better on some indicators than others; nevertheless, ethnic minorities and poorer countries still demonstrate inequities. Dentistry must attempt to educate individuals early in their lifespan that a combination of personal oral health practices and current dental techniques offers the potential for successful oral health throughout one's lifetime.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

An empirical test of the validity of the Oral Health Status Index (OHSI) on a minority population.

Disease varies in different populations based on sociodemographic variables, and there is limited understanding of this interaction. The purpose of this methodological study was to determine the validity of the Oral Health Status Index, a disease-based index, on a Hispanic population by comparing it with the NIDCR epidemiological measures of disease, with the addition of demographic and behavioral variables. The epidemiologic data were collected according to the criteria defined by the NIDCR, including: a modified Decayed Missing Filled Surfaces Index, gingival inflammation, calculus, and destructive periodontal disease measures. The demographic and behavioral variables were gathered from 240 interviews with Hispanic adults in two community clinics. Bivariate analysis was used to determine relationships between the descriptive epidemiologic, demographic, and behavioral variables and the Oral Health Status Index (OHSI). There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in mean OHSI scores among the demographic variables age, education, income, and place of birth; and the behavioral variables alcohol consumption, flossing, and acculturation. Multiple regression analysis with the OHSI as the dependent variable showed that the statistically significant (p < 0.001) epidemiologic predictors were: percentage of Decayed Teeth/Decayed, Filled Teeth; Number of Replaced Teeth/Missing Teeth; and millimeters of mesial attachment loss. These collectively explained 47.49% of the variance in the regression. The addition of demographic variables to the epidemiologic regression identified age (p < 0.05), gender (p < 0.01), and place of birth (p < 0.01) as significant predictors that explained an additional 4.12% of the variance, collectively bringing the total explained variance to 51.61%. The behavioral variables did not contribute significantly to predicting the OHSI regression score. The Oral Health Status Index in this study is validated by its correlation with both the epidemiologic measures and the demographic variables. This combination of variables separated the Hispanics into Mexicans and Central/South Americans.

Acculturation↗
PubMed1998

Findings of clinical and radiographic caries among several adult age groups.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are aged-based variations in the association between clinically detected and radiographically detected caries and whether the prevalence of clinically undetected radiographic caries varies across adult age groups. STUDY DESIGN: The data for the analysis were from a clinical study that evaluated the efficacy of guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs. A total of 460 subjects had clinical examinations and interpretation made on full-mouth radiographs. Analysis was conducted to determine the tooth-specific and subject-specific prevalences of clinically undetected caries and to establish whether the association between clinical signs and radiographic signs varied by subject age. RESULTS: In total, approximately 5.8% of clinically sound teeth showed radiographic evidence of dentinal caries, and the prevalence increased with patient age. The prevalence of clinical signs of medium and large caries was 7.8% in 12,358 teeth in which caries was both clinically and radiographically present. However, for more than 80% of the teeth with clinically undetected caries, the lesions were evident on the interproximal radiographs. The associations between clinical and radiographic signs of dentinal caries were homogeneous across age groups. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that adolescents and adults continue to have medium and large caries, although the location of the caries differs by age group, with higher proportions of gingival caries in older patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Consistency of patient classification in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

The purpose of this study was to examine diagnosis and treatment planning categorizations used by experienced orthodontists. Thirty-nine clinicians were asked to evaluate six test cases and formulate a diagnosis and treatment plan for each. The information provided was categorized using a problem-oriented classification. The results indicate little agreement exists in diagnostic subcategories, such as molar relationship, degree of crowding, or the nature of skeletal discrepancies. There was also little agreement regarding some treatment strategies, such as extraction of teeth, the use of orthopedic appliances, or the use of surgery. A need exists for better definitions of diagnostic criteria and appropriate treatment options.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1998

Components of self-reported oral health and general health in racial and ethnic groups.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the validity of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), a self-reported oral health measure, when used in an all-age adult sample of Hispanics and African-Americans. METHODS: The study groups were 506 disadvantaged Hispanic and African-American adults who were recruited at low-cost medical and dental clinics. To explore the validity of the GOHAI in an all-age, ethnically diverse sample, principal component and principal factor analyses were conducted on the 12 items of the GOHAI and the 14 items constituting the MOS physical/social and mental health components. RESULTS: Four factors accounted for 40 percent of the total variance of health as measured by the MOS and GOHAI items: general health, physical/worry oral health, mental health, and social oral health. An association between socioeconomic variables and each subscale was found to be significant except for the physical/worry oral health subscale. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the GOHAI is valid when used in younger and ethnically diverse samples. The findings also emphasize that oral health is distinct from general health and that the use of generic self-reported measures of health may miss important aspects of oral health that are valuable for dental health professionals.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Perceptions of the natural dentition in the context of multiple variables.

Perceived oral health status has been shown to be associated with a variety of single clinical and self-reported indicators of oral health and oral health-related behaviors. A behavioral model is utilized which hypothesizes that perceived condition of natural teeth is predicted by multiple factors, including individual demographic and enabling characteristics, other health perceptions and orientations, actual levels of diseases and conditions, and self-defined need for treatment. The data are from the clinical examination and adult questionnaire of Phase 1 (1988-1991) of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is based on a stratified multistage probability sample to produce nationally representative data for the civilian, non-institutionalized US population. Multivariate hierarchical regressions were used to assess perceived condition of natural teeth in two groups of dentate adults (those with a dental visit during the past 12 months, and those with a less recent dental visit). Self-defined treatment need made a significant, non-trivial contribution after other variables had been controlled. In both subpopulation models, the perception of general health and epidemiological indicators of oral health status were also significant factors. Socio-economic indicators did not contribute significantly in either regression. Understanding components of overall perceptions of oral health moves us closer to understanding oral health behaviors and oral-health-related quality of life.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes--measuring health status and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: This paper summarises proceedings of a conference that aimed to evaluate existing measures of oral health related quality of life and to recommend new directions for their use in oral health outcomes research. METHOD: A two day conference was held in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, in June 1996. Background papers, poster-discussion sessions, small group discussions and reactor papers were used to analyse 11 oral health related quality of life instruments and to evaluate their potential for use in health outcomes research. RESULTS: Speakers emphasised the need to include quality of life in multidimensional assessments of oral health outcomes. Existing instruments capture numerous quality of life dimensions using a variety of question- and response-formats. The instruments have been used primarily in cross-sectional, observational studies rather than longitudinal, intervention studies that evaluate health outcomes. There is little experience from their use in long-term follow-up studies and with some special population sub-groups. Recommendations for further research are presented in papers that follow this summary paper. CONCLUSIONS: There has been substantial development and use of quality of life measures in oral health surveys, and there is an immediate need for further research that modifies and uses those instruments in oral health outcomes research.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1997

Conceptualizing oral health and oral health-related quality of life.

This investigation considers oral health from a health-related quality of life perspective using a multidimensional concept representing a combination of impairment, function, perceptions, and/or opportunity. A subset of dentate individuals aged 18 and older from a national probability sample of the U.S. was selected for the reported analysis with data available from personal interviews, self-administered questionnaires, and oral examinations. Impairment was represented by clinically assessed active diseases and sequelae of diseases and self-reported acute symptoms. Other domains are represented by self-reported problems with function, perception of control over oral health, satisfaction with teeth, value attributed to oral health, and opportunity to obtain dental care. Principal components analysis with varimax rotation provided a structure to interpret four factors: accumulated oral neglect, self-perceived symptoms and problems, reparable oral diseases, and oral health values and priorities. Approximately 50% of the variance was explained by these four factors. Factor-based scores, envisioned as an index or summary measure representing the combination of variables identified in each factor, were used to assess potential validity. Whites had lower levels of accumulated oral neglect, fewer symptoms, and less reparable oral disease, but similar oral health values, than non-whites. Level of formal education was associated with each of the four factor-based scores. Age was directly associated with accumulated oral neglect, but the youngest age group had significantly more reparable oral diseases. Individuals with a dental visit in the past two years had considerably less accumulated oral neglect, fewer self-perceived problems, less reparable oral disease, and higher values of oral health than those without a dental visit in the past two years. Ordinary least square regressions were performed on each of the four factor-based scores using eight sociodemographic and economic variables. All four regression models were significant, with only the education variable being significant across all models. These analyses provide no evidence for one unique factor representing oral health. Rather, a conceptual framework for oral health appears to be represented by a set of reasonably independent components, including two groups of clinically assessed oral health, which together more fully represent oral health than any one single variable. Conceptualizing and measuring oral health multidimensionally leads us closer to examining it as part of general health.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Sexual activity and satisfaction among very old adults: results from a community-dwelling Medicare population survey.

This article explores the relationship between sociopsychological factors, sexual activity, and sexual satisfaction in a sample of 1,216 elderly people (mean age = 77.3). Almost 30% had participated in sexual activity in the past month and 67% were satisfied with current level of sexual activity. Men are more likely to be sexually active, but less apt than women to be satisfied with their level of sexual activity. Regarding predictors of sexual activity, for men the strongest predictors were being younger and having more education. For women, the strongest predictor by far was being married. For both men and women the strongest predictors for satisfaction were being sexually active and having positive mental health scores. In summary, the main variables predicting sexual activity were being married, having more education, being younger, being male, and having good social networks. The main predictors for satisfaction with sexual activity were, in addition to being sexually active, being female, having good mental health, and better functional status.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Comparing the impact of oral disease in two populations of older adults: application of the geriatric oral health assessment index.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the distributional and psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in two samples of older adults, and examines how the self-perceived impact of oral disease, as measured by the GOHAI, varies in accordance with sample sociodemographic and health characteristics. METHODS: Results are based on survey data from two samples of older men: a Medicare sample of patients using community physicians (n = 799; mean age = 74) and users of VA ambulatory health care (n = 542; mean age = 72). RESULTS: The findings indicate significant differences between samples in mean GOHAI scores, with the VA sample exhibiting worse scores. A number of similarities in psychometric properties of the instrument across the two samples were found: high internal consistency reliability and similar inter-item and item-scale correlations. Factors analyses revealed somewhat different structures between the two samples, but explained similar amounts of variance; regression analyses indicated that income and self-rated oral health were significant predictors of GOHAI scores in both samples. CONCLUSIONS: The GOHAI exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties in both samples of older men. Results suggest continued use of the GOHAI as an indicator of the impact of oral conditions on functioning and well-being in a variety of samples.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Predisposing, enabling, and need for dental treatment characteristics of ICS-II USA ethnically diverse groups.

Personal characteristics (predisposing, enabling, and need) are described for the population-based samples of adults interviewed in the International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS-II) USA research locations. Differences in sample characteristics are compared by ethnic group (African-American, Native American, Hispanic, and White) and age cohort (35-44 and 65-74 years old) by means of Bonferroni multiple-means tests and Student's t tests. Differences in the personal characteristics of these diverse comparison groups abound. Bivariate results indicated that White adults from both age cohorts had higher socioeconomic levels, more positive self-rated health status, and greater proportions of individuals with dental benefits. Lakota adults from both age cohorts reported lower self-rated health status and were most likely to report total tooth loss. Hispanic persons were significantly less likely to report a usual source of dental care or dental benefits. Need for dental treatment (oral pain and oral symptoms index) was generally higher amng Native American and Hispanic groups. It is critical that the differences highlighted between the among these groups be studied in appropriate strategies for improving the oral health of USA adults are to be determined.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Perceived oral health in a diverse sample.

Measures of perceived oral health represent subjective, individual perspective of one's health. One measure commonly used is the single-item perceived oral health rating: How would you rate your overall oral health? These analyses examine the associations among age, ethnicity, and perceived oral health within the context of a comprehensive battery of 21 predisposing, enabling, and need variables. The study of compares the adult data from three United States research locations of the International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS-II). Only social survey data were used for this analysis. The multiple regression model explains over 30% of the variance in perceived oral health, with R squares ranging from 0.324 for Indian Health Service sites to 0.391 for San Antonio. The most important significant predictors include ethnic group, education, perceived general health status, being edentulous or not having a partial denture, having no oral pain, fewer oral symptoms, and having one or more dental visits. The predictors of positive perceived oral health for the diverse groups highlight interesting age and ethnic differences. The only universal predictor for the middle-aged adults was having fewer oral symptoms. For the older adults, being edentulous or not having a partial denture was the only universal predictor. The findings suggest that perceived oral health may be a useful outcome measure in dentistry because of its relation to predisposing sociodemographics and dental utilization.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Orthodontic residents' indications for use of the lateral TMJ tomogram and the posteroanterior cephalogram.

The purpose of this study was to determine the selection criteria used by orthodontic residents for ordering a corrected lateral tomogram (LT) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and a posteroanterior cephalogram (PAC) for the diagnosis of patients needing orthodontic care. The impact of the radiographs on their treatment plans was also assessed. We conducted a study of the 144 new patients assigned to eight orthodontic residents during a two-year period. The residents responded through questionnaires describing their rationale for ordering the radiographs. A LT was ordered for twenty-eight (19 percent) of the patients. The most common reasons cited for requesting the LTs were TMJ clicking (67 percent) and pain (33 percent). The residents also perceived a need to order the LT for medico-legal protection in 85 percent of these cases. The LT tended not to have an impact on treatment planning. A PAC was ordered thirty-eight times (26 percent). The most common reasons cited by residents for ordering a PAC included clinical findings of facial asymmetry (41 percent) and maxillary airway anatomy (24 percent). Medico-legal protection was a perceived need in only 12 percent of the cases. While the PAC had no impact on treatment planning for 56 percent of the cases, they did define the transverse problems as dental or skeletal for 38 percent of the cases. Six patient traits were statistically associated with PAC requests: difficulty chewing, abnormal TMJ, TMJ clicking, facial asymmetry. crossbite, and midline discrepancy. The teaching of appropriate selection criteria for ordering these radiographs needs to be emphasized early in a resident's training.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Indicators of oral health in diverse ethnic and age groups: findings from the International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS-II) USA research locations.

Racial-ethnic group differences are assessed using a standardized set of oral health indicators, as well as various predisposing, enabling and need characteristics collected in the International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS-II) USA research locations. The unique data set contains comparable data on African-American, Native American, Hispanic, primarily Mexican-American, and White adults. Age group differences in oral health indicators are also compared in two adult age cohorts (35-44 and 65-74 years). Since data were collected from geographically diverse regions of the United States, differences in oral health indicators are considered within the context of different dental care delivery systems and external environments. Results indicate that the gap in oral health between Whites and ethnic minority groups is pervasive across research locations and age cohorts. Variation in regional dental care delivery systems and the varying effects of race-ethnicity and age cohort suggest that alternative health promotion strategies will be needed for improving oral health in diverse populations.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Relationships between clinician variability and radiographic guidelines.

This study evaluated the replicability of clinical measurements under careful calibration of multiple dentists and how the replicability can relate to their use as selection criteria in guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs. For 48 consenting patients, three dentists clinically examined each patient and recorded the presence of all clinical findings using standardized selection criteria. The examinations were performed independently of each other, but with periodic conferences of the dentists to clarify general measurement criteria. The degree of agreement among the dentists is described by the interrater agreement kappa for several standard clinical indications such as rating of caries, periodontal disease, and tooth mobility. Almost perfect agreement was obtained for tooth status, restoration size, and restoration material. Moderate agreement resulted for measures of caries, defective restoration presence, and gingival recession presence. Only fair agreement was obtained for other periodontal disease measures. The relationship between extent of agreement and guidelines' results was examined for the FDA Guidelines. The differences among the dentists' clinical measurements resulted in considerable differences among the radiographs that were selected by the FDA Guidelines' criteria. Even so, the missed disease rates for 490 patients in a larger study of the FDA Guidelines' efficacy were very low and did not vary greatly among the three dentists. We conclude that guidelines' criteria can be quite robust to variation from dentists' clinical measurement differences, as seen from the FDA Guidelines applied under the idealized setting where the dentists are periodically recalibrated through group discussions of the clinical measurements' definitions and interpretations.

Adolescent↗