[Regulations for readmission of patients into the same hospital].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Justus de Zeeuw.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS) is assumed to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor, whereas central sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes breathing occurs in congestive heart failure and has a prognostic value. CASE REPORT: The case of a 74-year-old man with long-term continuous positive airway pressure treatment due to OSAS is reported. In a routine polysomnography central apneas and Cheyne-Stokes breathing without any clinical signs of heart failure were seen. Further investigations revealed a newly diagnosed aortic valve stenosis with good left ventricular function. Clinical signs of congestive heart failure came up 2 weeks after first diagnosed Cheyne-Stokes breathing. CONCLUSION: Cheyne-Stokes breathing can be observed in acute heart failure before occurrence of any clinical signs of congestive heart failure and should always lead to further investigations. The current understanding of pathophysiological pathways in Cheyne-Stokes breathing is reviewed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Theophylline is effective in the treatment of central apneas and periodic breathing. In obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), results of pharmacological monotherapy with theophylline are inconsistent. The present study investigates whether additional theophylline in patients with OSAS and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy might improve ventilation, lower effective CPAP pressure levels or affect sleep architecture. Patients with mild to moderate OSAS (mean apnea index [AI] 12.8+/-11.7) and CPAP therapy (Autoset system; n=16, all male) received either 900 mg of oral sustained-release theophylline (T) or placebo (P) on two separate nights, 3 days apart, using a randomized double-blind crossover study design. There was no change in AI (T: 0.7+/-1.4 vs. P: 0.7+/-0.6/h; P=0.3) or apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; T: 4.3+/-3.3 vs. P: 4.5+/-3.7/h; P=0.84) when theophylline was added to CPAP therapy. We observed no difference in mean CPAP pressure (T: 6.9+/-2.1 vs. P: 6.7+/-1.9 cm H2O; P=0.7) or 95% pressure percentiles (T: 9.7+/-2.7 vs. P: 9.3+/-2.1cm H2O; P=0.3) when nights with theophylline were compared to placebo nights. Theophylline reduced significantly total sleep time (T: 290.6+/-58.9 vs. P: 338.0+/-40.1 min; P=0.02) and thus sleep efficiency (SE; T: 70.5+/-14.9%, P: 82.0+/-70.5%; P=0.005). Rapid eye movement and slow wave sleep were not affected. Oral theophylline did not show any additional effects on ventilation parameters or pressures in patients with mild to moderate OSAS once CPAP therapy has been successfully installed. SE was reduced with theophylline with unchanged sleep architecture. The role of oral theophylline may be in patients with predominately central apneas not eligible for ventilation therapy or severe cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although several determinants of survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) have been identified, current knowledge regarding factors influencing the postoperative quality of life (QoL) is poor. The study aim was to evaluate health-related QoL (using Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36) in six-month survivors after AVR, and to determine predictors of outcome. METHODS: All patients undergoing heart valve surgery at the authors' hospital between 1992 and May 1999 were included. Data from 201 patients (119 males, 82 females; mean age 66.6 years) after AVR were obtained. The mean observation period was 42.5 months. RESULTS: Patients in preoperative NYHA classes I and II had a postoperative QoL comparable to that of the general population, while subjects in NYHA classes III and IV scored significantly lower. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors (preoperative NYHA class, diabetes mellitus, prosthetic valve type, sternal complications) for the Physical component score. NYHA class, atrial fibrillation, sternal complications and type of valvular heart disease were predictors for the Mental component score. No correlation was found between preoperative left ventricular function or size, pre-existing coronary artery disease or prior myocardial infarction and the postoperative QoL. CONCLUSION: Notably, preoperative aortic stenosis was identified as a strong and independent predictor of the postoperative QoL in six-month survivors after AVR. This effect was independent of left ventricular size and function. These findings support the proposal that patients with aortic stenosis should be operated on at an earlier stage, if possible before they develop symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Only poor data regarding changes in quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy concerning long-term effects are available. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 85 patients were evaluated before and under CPAP therapy using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Quality of Life, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and the Quality of Life Index (QL-Index). The results of patients with continuous usage of CPAP (n = 66) were compared with a control group of patients who discontinued CPAP therapy (n = 19). RESULTS: VAS (before CPAP 56.9 +/- 27.0, under CPAP 67.2 +/- 21.8 mm; p = 0.027) as well as the NHP dimensions "Energy" (before CPAP 44.2 +/- 39.5, under CPAP 25.0 +/- 34.2 points; p < 0.001), "Emotional reactions" (before CPAP 24.7 +/- 22.5, under CPAP 11.8 +/- 18.8 points; p < 0,001), and "Sleep problems" (before CPAP 32.0 + 30.0, under CPAP 21.5 + 27.2 points; p = 0.005) showed a significant improvement after 16 +/- 9-month follow-up. In the control group, none of the instruments displayed a significant change. A correlation between CPAP compliance (mask hours) and changes in quality of life was not detected. CONCLUSION: Thus, even suboptimal CPAP usage might bring benefit regarding quality of life. As not all health-related instruments or dimensions were able to display the effects on quality of life, there is a need to translate and validate disease-specific instruments into the German language.