Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Judith Cope

Publications and source records attributed to Judith Cope.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Introducing Critical Care Outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of introducing a critical care outreach service on in-hospital mortality and length of stay in a general acute hospital. DESIGN: A pragmatic ward-randomised trial design was used, with intervention introduced to all wards in sequence. No blinding was possible. SETTING: Sixteen adult wards in an 800-bed general hospital in the north of England. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: All admissions to the 16 surgical, medical and elderly care wards during 32-week study period were included (7450 patients in total, of whom 2903 were eligible for the primary comparison). INTERVENTIONS: Essential elements of the Critical Care Outreach service introduced during the study were a nurse-led team of nurses and doctors experienced in critical care, a 24-h service, emphasis on education, support and practical help for ward staff. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The main outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Outreach intervention reduced in-hospital mortality compared with control (two-level odds ratio: 0.52 (95% CI 0.32-0.85). A possible increased length of stay associated with outreach was not fully supported by confirmatory and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests outreach reduces mortality in general hospital wards. It may also increase length of stay, but our findings on this are equivocal.

Aged↗

Paediatric medicines research in the UK: how to move forward?

There have been numerous studies to show that many of the medicines used in children are used off-label or are unlicensed for use in children. When children are prescribed unlicensed and off-label medications, some people may see them as unknowing participants in informal and uncontrolled experiments. However, the licensing status of a drug can be seen as a by-product of the real issues: the safety, efficacy and quality of these medicines in the current licensing system. It is important to conduct research in order to provide high quality data regarding safety and efficacy to support evidence-based paediatric prescribing. Clinical trials will always be an invaluable means of acquiring vital information about a drug; but when it comes to children, we may find that these trials are not always practical for technical, ethical and financial reasons; therefore, it is important to explore other methodologies in paediatric medicines research. Pharmacoepidemiological and prospective cohort studies could provide vital safety and efficacy data on paediatric medicines; however, resources need to be invested in the methodological research. Paediatric drug formulation research is under-resourced and under-valued, and, unfortunately, fatal and serious adverse reactions due to inappropriate formulations have been reported in many instances. Paediatric medication is a complex problem; we need to use all available tools for research on safety, efficacy and formulation. The reason for lack of progress in paediatric drug research is most likely due to lack of resources and research capacity. The industry and government should work together and invest more money in paediatric drug research. Finally, regulatory authorities, healthcare professionals and academics need to rethink the research strategy in order to provide better medicines for children.

Child↗