Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Joshua B Rubin

Publications and source records attributed to Joshua B Rubin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proteogenomic analysis of pediatric and AYA high-grade glioma reveals age-dependent biology, female-male differences, and kinase targets.

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) in children and adolescents and young adults (AYA) exhibit distinct biology across the neurodevelopmental spectrum. To dissect tumor-intrinsic molecular characteristics independent of developmental variation, we perform comprehensive proteogenomic analyses of tumors from 112 HGG patients aged 0-40 years. Our multi-omics analysis identifies two AYA subgroups-adolescents (aged 15-26 years) and young adults (aged 26-40 years)-with distinct molecular profiles and survival outcomes. Tumor-normal comparisons and survival modeling highlight roles of oxidative phosphorylation and neuronal system biology in glioma progression. Causal network analysis and cell line studies provide a rationale for personalized therapies targeting candidate kinases, such as CDK8. Survival modeling, clustering, and immune-landscape analyses identify proteins, post-translational modifications, and immune signatures linked to outcomes and reveal clinically relevant differences between male and female patients.

adolescent and young adult glioma

Circadian variation in MGMT promoter methylation and expression predicts sensitivity to temozolomide in glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Recent studies show that glioblastoma (GBM) is more sensitive to temozolomide (TMZ) in the morning. In cells, inhibiting O6-Methylguanine-DNA-Methyltransferase (MGMT) abolished time-dependent TMZ efficacy, suggesting that circadian regulation of this DNA repair enzyme underlies daily TMZ sensitivity. Here, we tested the hypotheses that MGMT promoter methylation and protein abundance vary with time-of-day in GBM, resulting in daily rhythms in TMZ efficacy. METHODS: We assessed daily rhythms in MGMT promoter methylation in GBM in vitro and retrospectively analyzed MGMT methylation status in human GBM biopsies collected at different times of day. Next, we measured MGMT and BMAL1 protein abundances in GBM cells collected at four-hour intervals. To understand the therapeutic implications of circadian variations in MGMT, we incorporated its daily rhythms into an in vitro mathematical model capturing interactions between MGMT, TMZ, and GBM DNA. RESULTS: We found daily rhythms in MGMT promoter methylation and protein levels in GBM in vitro, and in patient biopsies peaking at midday. Further, MGMT protein levels peaked at CT4, corresponding to the time of maximal TMZ efficacy in vitro. When we incorporated cell-intrinsic circadian rhythms in MGMT protein into a mathematical model for GBM chemotherapy, we found that dosing when daily MGMT levels peaked and began to decline produced maximum DNA damage. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the likelihood of diagnosis of MGMT promoter methylation may vary with time of biopsy in GBM. Furthermore, theoretical modeling predicts that efforts to deliver TMZ after the daily peak of MGMT activity, with exact time being dose-dependent, may significantly enhance its therapeutic efficacy.

Humans