Biomedical subjects

Joseph Shalhoub

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph Shalhoub.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Development of a core descriptor set for studies assessing interventions for diabetes-related foot ulceration.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Foot ulceration is a common complication of diabetes and is associated with high mortality and costs. The quality of evidence to inform clinical practice is limited, partly because clinical studies do not consistently report baseline participant characteristics. This study aimed to develop a core descriptor set (CDS), a minimum set of descriptors to be measured in all studies evaluating interventions for people with diabetes-related foot ulceration. METHODS: A longlist of descriptors was generated through a systematic review of studies assessing interventions for diabetes-related foot ulcers, pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019128250). The identified descriptors were then ranked based on perceived importance by healthcare professionals from different fields and geographical locations using a nine-point Likert scale in the first round of a Delphi survey. Using standardised criteria, descriptors without consensus were re-ranked in round two. Critical descriptors and those without consensus after the Delphi process were discussed in the consensus meeting to finalise the CDS. RESULTS: The systematic review yielded 95 candidate descriptors. The two Delphi rounds were completed by 102 and 69 healthcare professionals, respectively. The Delphi process identified 34 critically important descriptors and 13 descriptors without consensus, which were discussed in the consensus meeting. The ratified CDS included 28 descriptors across nine domains: demographic variables; individual factors; ulcer characteristics; limb characteristics; ongoing medical interventions; previous surgical interventions; medication history; biochemical measurements; and quality of life/function/symptoms. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This CDS reflects characteristics important to health professionals and researchers when reporting clinical studies on diabetes-related foot ulceration. Its use will aid the reporting of future studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Barefoot ambulation following partial foot amputation: A systematic review of biomechanical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Partial foot amputation (PFA) is increasingly performed due to rising prevalence of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. While PFA may preserve gait and reduce energy expenditure compared with transtibial amputation, biomechanical deficits are common. This review aimed to evaluate biomechanical outcomes during baref following PFA. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting biomechanical outcomes in adults with PFA without prosthesis. Eligible outcomes included spatiotemporal metrics, joint kinematics and kinetics, plantar pressures, and ground reaction forces. FINDINGS: Twelve studies including a total of 101 participants met inclusion criteria. Across studies, PFA was associated with impaired barefoot gait. This included spatiotemporal changes, such as reduced walking speed and shorter step length, and kinetic changes, such as reduced ankle power. Elevated plantar pressures were commonly reported, particularly in the forefoot and midfoot, highlighting loading abnormalities in the residuum. Several studies also described proximal compensatory strategies at the knee and hip, suggesting that biomechanical consequences extend beyond the foot and ankle. However, the evidence base was limited by small sample sizes, inconsistent protocols, and substantial heterogeneity. INTERPRETATION: Barefoot walking is impaired after partial foot amputation and the degree of dysfunction may vary by amputation level. Abnormal loading and compensatory changes may extend beyond the foot and ankle to the knee and hip. Given the limited and methodologically heterogeneous evidence, larger prospective studies with standardised biomechanical outcomes are needed to clarify the effects of amputation level and aetiology. This standardisation is important to inform surgical planning, rehabilitation, and prosthetic device design.

Humans↗