Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jorge Cuadros

Publications and source records attributed to Jorge Cuadros.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Is the future now?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Eye Diseases↗

Luteinizing hormone supplementation increases pregnancy rates in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist donor cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether LH supplementation improved pregnancy and implantation rates in GnRH antagonist donor cycles. DESIGN: Donors were randomly assigned to a protocol using GnRH antagonist (GnRH-a) alone or GnRH-a + recombinant LH. Analysis of variance, Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate. SETTING: Private clinical setting. PATIENT(S): Young voluntary donors with antagonist (n = 20) and antagonist + LH (n = 22). Fifty-five patients received oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Donors received the GnRH-a (Cetrorelix, 0.25 mg/day) alone or in combination with recombinant LH (75 IU/day). Ovulation induction was carried out with recombinant FSH in a step-down protocol. The endometrial tissue of recipient patients was prepared with oral E(2) and P. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and implantation rates in a donor program. RESULT(S): A significant increase in MII oocyte (80% vs. 71%), fertilization rates (83% vs. 71%), G1 embryos (17% vs. 3%), and implantation rates (35% vs. 15%), were found in recipients whose embryos originated from donors receiving GnRH-a + recombinant LH as compared to donors receiving GnRH-a alone. Estradiol levels, pregnancy/transfer and clinical pregnancies were lower (not significant) in donors treated with the GnRH-a alone vs. those receiving the recombinant LH-supplemented GnRH-a. CONCLUSION(S): The LH supplementation improved the possibilities of gestation for recipients whose embryos originated from GnRH-a-treated donors.

Adult↗

EyePACS: an open source clinical communication system for eye care.

PURPOSE: EyePACS is an application for communicating and archiving eye-related patient information, images, and diagnostic data. We studied how users adopted the system in diverse clinical settings. METHODS: 53 clinicians and 142 students uploaded cases over 2.5 years from 6 pilot sites: a university teaching clinic, a university glaucoma clinic, an urban private optometric practice, a rural elderly care facility, a diabetic management program, and an eye hospital in India. RESULTS: EyePACS collected 1,122 cases. Users employed it for informal "curbside" consults in 17% of cases. Other uses of the system were: 1) to replace telephone and fax referrals to a retinal specialist (10%), 2) as part of ocular teleconsultations and diabetic retinopathy screening (31%), 3) for education via digital grand rounds and evaluation of students (32%), and 4) for research (10%). CONCLUSION: EyePACS has been used successfully for consults and education in diverse settings. The resulting database of digital cases serves as a searchable reference for clinicians.

Aged↗