Jonathan S Berg | Search PubMed

PubMed2025

Operationalizing the Wilson-Jungner principles for the genomics era: Consensus recommendations from the International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing.

PURPOSE: For decades, the selection of disorders included in newborn screening (NBS) programs has been guided by principles published by Wilson and Jungner in 1968. As research explores the expansion of conditions included in NBS through genomic sequencing, there is a critical need for updated recommendations to address the opportunities and complexities of genomic data. METHODS: The International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing includes leaders from over 16 research projects investigating genomic NBS across the United Kingdom, Europe, United States, and Oceania. Consortium members were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study, aggregating opinion on the selection of conditions for genomic NBS through 3 rounds of online questionnaires, with feedback provided to participants between rounds. RESULTS: In round 1, 94 participants completed the questionnaire, and 10 of 43 statements reached consensus. In round 2, 81 participants completed the questionnaire, and 14 of 27 statements reached consensus. In round 3, 68 participants completed the questionnaire, and all 10 statements reached 72% or more consensus. CONCLUSION: The 10 consensus recommendations developed in this study can guide future research and public health programs performing genomic NBS. This process also identified key areas of participant discordance, highlighting important topics for future research.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Expanding pediatric genomic screening beyond current newborn screening presents both opportunities and challenges to primary care providers. We are developing a novel paradigm called Age-Based Genomic Screening (ABGS), which will incorporate targeted genomic sequencing for select, highly actionable genetic conditions into routine care at relevant time-points throughout childhood. We surveyed pediatric primary care providers in North Carolina to identify potential ABGS implementation determinants and strategies to address them. STUDY DESIGN: We disseminated an electronic survey to family medicine and pediatric primary care clinicians. Survey items were modeled on constructs previously identified as important to genomic medicine and assessed perceived utility, benefits, barriers, and facilitators of implementing targeted genomic screening in pediatric primary care. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 93 individuals completed the survey. Over 85% of respondents agreed that genomic screening was important and impactful in their patient care but about 30% lacked confidence in their ability to implement it in their practice. The most cited benefits of the ABGS program were related to readiness for implementation and the evidence, strength, and quality of the intervention. The most concerning barriers included cost for patients and available resources, with 87% and 75% of respondents having extreme or moderate concern for these barriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have implications both for the design of the ABGS pilot program and directions for future research in genomic implementation. In particular, the blueprint for the pilot program must include specific plans for ensuring primary care providers have the time and resources available for shared decision making with their patients about engaging in genomic screening.

Journal Article↗