Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jonathan L Halperin

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan L Halperin.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Efficacy of transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation at 6 months: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. We compared a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy with a conventional strategy in patients with AF > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: The ACUTE study was a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, with 1222 patients. Six-month follow-up was available in 1034 patients (85%), 525 in the TEE group and 509 in the conventional group. The primary composite end points were cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism at 6 months, which was a prespecified time point. Secondary end points were hemorrhage, mortality, and sinus rhythm. RESULTS: At 6 months, there was no difference in composite embolic events between the TEE group and the conventional group (10 [2%] vs 4 [0.8%]; risk ratio (RR) 2.47, 95% CI 0.78-7.88; P = .11). However, the hemorrhagic rate was significantly lower in the TEE group (23 [4.4%] vs 38 [7.5%]; RR 0.58, 96% CI 0.35-0.97; P = .04). There was no difference between the 2 treatment groups in all-cause mortality (21 [4%] vs 14 [2.8%]; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.76-2.92; P = .25) and in the occurrence of normal sinus rhythm between the 2 groups (305 [62.2%] vs 280 [58.1%]; P = .51). Sinus rhythm at 6 months was more common in the TEE-guided group, in those patients who had direct current cardioversion (238 [62.5%] vs 151 [53.9%]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The TEE-guided strategy may be considered a clinically effective alternative to a conventional anticoagulation strategy for patients with AF of > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month period.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Risks and benefits of combining aspirin with anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: an exploratory analysis of stroke prevention using an oral thrombin inhibitor in atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF) trials.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is used in combination with anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but evidence of additional efficacy is not available. METHODS: We compared ischemic events and bleeding in the SPORTIF III and IV randomized trials of anticoagulation with warfarin (international normalized ratio 2-3) or fixed-dose ximelagatran. Low-dose aspirin (<100 mg/d) was allowed based on prevailing guidelines. RESULTS: The 14% of patients receiving aspirin more often had diabetes (27.5% vs 23%, P < .01), coronary artery disease (69% vs 41%, P < .01), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (26% vs 20%, P < .01), and left ventricular dysfunction (41% vs 36%, P < .01). Addition of aspirin to either warfarin or ximelagatran was associated with no reduction in stroke or systemic embolism. Major bleeding occurred significantly more often with aspirin plus warfarin (3.9% per year) than with warfarin alone (2.3% per year, P < .01), aspirin plus ximelagatran (2.0% per year), or ximelagatran alone (1.9% per year). The rate of myocardial infarction with aspirin and warfarin (0.6% per year) was not significantly different from that with ximelagatran alone (1.0% per year), warfarin alone (1.0% per year), or aspirin and ximelagatran (1.4% per year). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin combined with anticoagulant therapy was associated with no reduction in stroke, systemic embolism, or myocardial infarction in patients with AF. Aspirin combined with warfarin was associated with an incremental rate of major bleeding of 1.6% per year. No increased major bleeding occurred with aspirin and ximelagatran. These results suggest that the risks associated with addition of aspirin to anticoagulation in patients with AF outweigh the benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed2006

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Atrial Fibrillation↗
PubMed2006

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease)--summary of recommendations.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗
PubMed2006

Limitation of the resting ankle-brachial index in symptomatic patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been demonstrated to be prevalent in the primary care setting. However, it has also been shown to be unrecognized and under-treated. Owing to the association with cardiovascular disease it has been recommended to screen high-risk patients for PAD in the primary care setting using the ankle-brachial index (ABI). ABI has been demonstrated to be highly sensitive and specific in diagnosing PAD in patients with significant stenosis. However, the utility in patients with less severe stenosis and calcified vessels is in question. The aims of this study were to determine the diagnostic utility of measuring the ABI at rest in patients referred to the vascular laboratory for evaluation of suspected PAD, and to assess the added value of pulse volume recordings and post-exercise studies in patients with a normal ABI. A computerized vascular diagnostic laboratory database was queried for symptomatic outpatients referred for measurement of segmental blood pressure, the ABI or pulse volume recordings by physicians not specialized in the evaluation and management of patients with peripheral vascular disease. Of 707 patients undergoing outpatient physiologic arterial evaluations between February 1, 2003 and July 31, 2004, 396 met these inclusion criteria. Data recorded included resting ABI, ABI following treadmill exercise test and the presence of abnormal pulse volume recordings. The study population (n = 396) consisted of equal numbers of men and women (mean age 69 years, range 19-100 years). Among 396 studies, resting ABI values were normal in 183 (46.2%) and abnormal in 159 (40.2%). Of the 138 patients who underwent exercise testing, 84 had normal ABI readings at rest. In the 84 patients who had a normal ABI at rest and underwent exercise testing, the ABI fell below 0.9 after exercise in 26 (31%). Arterial non-compressibility was detected in 54 (13.6%) patients, whose average age was 67 years. Thirteen (24%) of those with non-compressible vessels had abnormal pulse volume recording (PVR) results, compared to five with normal resting ABI who had abnormal PVR findings (2.7%). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that nearly half of patients referred to the outpatient vascular laboratory because of suspected arterial disease had a normal resting ABI. While it is recommended that the ABI be measured at rest in patients at risk of PAD in primary care practice, these findings suggest that patients with symptoms of PAD should be more completely evaluated in a vascular laboratory. Furthermore, when the ABI is normal at rest in patients with symptoms of intermittent claudication, exercise testing is recommended to enhance the sensitivity for detection of PAD.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, warfarin prevents ischemic stroke, but dose adjustment, coagulation monitoring, and bleeding limit its use. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran with warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (2000-2001) conducted at 409 North American sites, involving 3922 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and additional stroke risk factors. INTERVENTIONS: Adjusted-dose warfarin (aiming for an international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 to 3.0) or fixed-dose oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was all strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolic events. The primary analysis was based on demonstrating noninferiority within an absolute margin of 2.0% per year according to the intention-to-treat model. RESULTS: During 6405 patient-years (mean 20 months) of follow-up, 88 patients experienced primary events. The mean (SD) INR with warfarin (2.4 [0.8]) was within target during 68% of the treatment period. The primary event rate with ximelagatran was 1.6% per year and with warfarin was 1.2% per year (absolute difference, 0.45% per year; 95% confidence interval, -0.13% to 1.03% per year; P<.001 for the predefined noninferiority hypothesis). When all-cause mortality was included in addition to stroke and systemic embolic events, the rate difference was 0.10% per year (95% confidence interval, -0.97% to 1.2% per year; P = .86). There was no difference between treatment groups in rates of major bleeding, but total bleeding (major and minor) was lower with ximelagatran (37% vs 47% per year; 95% confidence interval for the difference, -14% to -6.0% per year; P<.001). Serum alanine aminotransferase levels rose to greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal in 6.0% of patients treated with ximelagatran, usually within 6 months and typically declined whether or not treatment continued; however, one case of documented fatal liver disease and one other suggestive case occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results establish the efficacy of fixed-dose oral ximelagatran without coagulation monitoring compared with well-controlled warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring chronic anticoagulant therapy, but the potential for hepatotoxicity requires further investigation.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Ximelagatran: oral direct thrombin inhibition as anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes 50,000 to 100,000 ischemic strokes annually in the U.S., most of which could be prevented by oral anticoagulant treatment of the highest-risk patients. The greatest barrier to such treatment is the narrow therapeutic index of the vitamin K antagonists ([VKAs]: warfarin and related coumarin derivatives), the only oral anticoagulant agents currently available. Safe and effective treatment with the VKAs requires careful monitoring, because they interact with many other drugs and foods, and their anticoagulant action is unpredictable. Besides vitamin K, candidate targets for anticoagulant therapy include thrombin, a key prothrombotic mediator. Ximelagatran, the oral direct thrombin inhibitor at the most advanced stage of clinical development, is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active moiety, melagatran-a potent, competitive inhibitor of both free and clot-bound thrombin. Two large clinical trials have demonstrated that fixed-dose oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily, administered without coagulation monitoring, prevents stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with nonvalvular AF as effectively as well-controlled, adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0). The overall risk of bleeding was lower with ximelagatran than warfarin, although differences in rates of major hemorrhage were not statistically significant. Elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase levels above 3x the upper limit of normal occurred in approximately 6% of ximelagatran-treated patients but typically returned toward pretreatment levels without associated symptoms. In terms of preventing thromboembolism without hemorrhage, ximelagatran may have a more favorable benefit:risk profile than warfarin for patients with AF.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for stroke that becomes increasingly prevalent as populations age. More than half a dozen clinical trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin is the most effective therapy for stroke prophylaxis in AF. The narrow therapeutic index of warfarin requires that the intensity of anticoagulation be maintained within the international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 to optimize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk. The pharmacokinetics of warfarin are subject to variability due to interactions with multiple drugs and foods, making maintenance of the INR within this range difficult to achieve in clinical practice without close coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustments. Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for high-risk individuals with AF but these inherent limitations lead to substantial underprescribing, particularly in elderly patients at greatest risk. This has stimulated the development of new agents with improved benefit-risk profiles, such as ximelagatran, the first of the oral direct thrombin inhibitors, which has a wider therapeutic margin and low potential for drug interactions, allowing fixed dosing without anticoagulation monitoring. Ximelagatran has been evaluated for stroke prevention in AF in the Stroke Prevention using an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor in Atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) program, the largest clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF to date. The phase III trials of ximelagatran in AF, SPORTIF III and V, found a fixed oral dose of ximelagatran (36 mg twice daily) comparable to dose-adjusted warfarin (INR 2.0 to 3.0) in preventing stroke and systemic thromboembolic complications among high-risk patients with AF. Results from the population of over 7000 patients in SPORTIF III and V demonstrate noninferiority of ximelagatran compared with warfarin. Data from SPORTIF III show an absolute reduction in stroke and systemic embolic events with ximelagatran compared with warfarin of 1.6% per year versus 2.3% per year, respectively ( P = 0.10). SPORTIF V further supports noninferiority between the two agents with an absolute risk reduction of 0.45%, well within the predefined noninferiority margin (95% confidence interval -0.13, 1.03; P = 0.13). Although event rates for major bleeding did not differ significantly with ximelagatran versus warfarin in either study, combined rates for major and minor bleeding were significantly reduced with ximelagatran. The overall net clinical benefit, taking into account effects on stroke or systemic embolic events, major bleeding, and death, was also greater with ximelagatran compared with warfarin in both studies. Elevated serum transaminase enzymes were observed in approximately 6% of patients given ximelagatran in these trials. These typically occurred 1 to 6 months after initiating treatment and usually abated without clinical sequelae whether or not treatment was continued. Given the consistency of response, the favorable overall benefit-risk ratio and the convenience of fixed oral dosing, ximelagatran may increase the number of patients with AF eligible for anticoagulation and amplify the potential for prophylaxis against stroke.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2005

Elevated homocysteine levels in patients with end-stage renal disease.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of hemodialysis on plasma homocysteine levels, and the relationship of these values to clinical cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: Adults undergoing chronic hemodialysis were studied at baseline and at six months. Their clinical histories were obtained at the baseline visit, and measurements of plasma homocysteine concentration were made immediately prior to and following routine dialysis. The occurrence of clinical cardiovascular events was assessed over six months. RESULTS: We enrolled 147 patients (85 men and 62 women, age 58 +/- 15 years) who required hemodialysis for 3.4 +/- 3.4 years (mean +/- SD). The median homocysteine level for this population (including both pre- and post-dialysis values) was 17.3 micromoles/L. Mean pre-dialysis plasma homocysteine levels of patients with clinical cardiovascular disease did not differ significantly from those without the disease (22.5 +/- 9.9 vs. 25.4 +/- 24.5 micromoles/L, respectively), nor did post-dialysis levels differ between these populations. During six months follow-up, rates of ischemic events were not related to hyperhomocysteinemia. The difference between mean pre- and post-dialysis homocysteine levels (26.3 +/- 19.7 and 15.6 +/- 11.4 micromoles/L, respectively) and the decline in homocysteine over the course of a single dialysis treatment session (10.3 +/- 10.2 micromoles/L) were highly significant (p<0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma homocysteine levels were elevated in 82% of 147 patients with ESRD and fell to the normal range in a majority of patients during a single dialysis treatment session. Mean pre-dialysis levels did not change significantly over six months, however, and plasma homocysteine levels did not predict cardiovascular events in this population. There was also a trend towards worse outcomes in patients with lower homocysteine levels, which correlates to findings from recent studies. Further studies are needed to clarify the association between hyperhomocysteinemia and coronary risk in patients with ESRD.

Adult↗