Biomedical subjects

Jonathan J Ratcliff

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan J Ratcliff.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The validity and reliability of the affective competency score to evaluate death disclosure using standardized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the validity and reliability of the affective competency score (ACS), compared to a global rating measure to predict overall competency to perform a death disclosure in a standardized patient exercise and to investigate useful thresholds of the ACS. METHODS: Thirty-seven fourth-year students underwent standardized patient training in death disclosure during a fourth-year emergency medicine clerkship. Students were evaluated using a checklist, an ACS, and a global rating assessment. ACS interrater reliability, interitem reliability, item-total reliability, and split-half reliability were calculated. Area under the curve (AUC) measurements were used to establish criterion validity. RESULTS: For the ACS, item-total correlations ranged from 0.76 to 0.85, 0.76 to 0.93, and 0.42 to 0.87; the split-half reliability was 0.82 (p = 0.0001), 0.86 (p = 0.0001) and 0.55 (p = 0.0007) for the standardized patient (SP), the faculty and the medical students, respectively. Interitem correlations were adequate. A moderate interrater correlation of the ACS was observed between the faculty observer and the SP (r = 0.47; p = 0.04); however, the medical students' self evaluation did not correlate significantly with either the SP (r = -0.04; p = 0.79), or the faculty observer (r = 0.00; p = 0.99). The AUC for was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 1.00), 0.87 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.99), and 0.74 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95) for the faculty, SP, and medical student, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS may be a valid, reliable, and useful measure to assess communication skills by faculty or SPs in this setting. At an ACS score of 16, 19, and 21 points for faculty, SPs, and medical students, respectively, there is 100% specificity for the detection of competency assessed on a global rating. However, the ACS appears to have limited reliability and validity when used by medical students.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

West Nile virus among hospitalized, febrile patients: a case for expanding diagnostic testing.

In Georgia, most individuals reported with West Nile virus (WNV) disease have been diagnosed with West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND). Relatively few cases of West Nile Fever (WNF) are reported, and the burden of illness due to WNV is likely underestimated. From July through October 2003, WNV serologic testing was performed on enrolled patients>or=18 years of age with fever admitted to a large, urban hospital in Atlanta, Georgia through the emergency department (ED). Patients' history, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded. Residual blood drawn in the ED was tested to determine the presence of WNV IgG and IgM antibodies. Of 254 patients tested for WNV, four (1.6%) patients were positive for WNV IgM and IgG antibodies, and had a clinical illness compatible with WNV. None of the four positive patients were clinically suspected of having WNV infection; discharge diagnoses included pneumonia, migraine, stroke, and gout. These four patients accounted for 80% of all WNV diagnosed in this hospital, 44% of all cases in Fulton County, and 7% of all cases reported in Georgia in 2003. The occurrence of WNV disease may be substantially greater than currently reflected in disease statistics in Georgia and many other states. When indicators of WNV activity are present and patients are likely to have had intensive mosquito exposure, WNV should be considered in the differential diagnosis of seriously ill, febrile patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Proxy identification: a time-dependent analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the availability of next-of-kin (NOK) for proxy consent over the 24-hour time period following presentation of major trauma patients to a Level I trauma center. METHODS: The study was conducted by using a prospective, observational study design. Consecutive patients meeting predefined major trauma criteria during a three-month study period were enrolled and followed until NOK were contacted, or up to 24 hours. Survival analysis was used to determine the probability of NOK contact during the 24-hour follow-up period. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty (92%) of 382 subjects had NOK contacted during the follow-up period. The probabilities (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of NOK contact at the time of arrival (t = 0) and 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postpresentation were 0.25 (95% CI = 0.21 to 0.30), 0.68 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.72), 0.77 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.82), 0.80 (95% CI = 0.76 to 0.84), and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.84 to 0.90), respectively. The median time to contact was 40 minutes (95% CI = 27 to 54 min). CONCLUSIONS: One third of the trauma patients in this study did not have NOK available two hours following arrival in the emergency department. For time-critical research protocols, the time to NOK contact can significantly impact the ability to ensure prompt enrollment and treatment in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability and consistency of these data.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Shedding new light on the "safe" club drug: methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy)-related fatalities.

OBJECTIVES: To report the pathology, toxicology, cause, and manner of death in 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-associated fatalities in the United States. Although use trends are increasing, data regarding the hazards of MDMA are limited. METHODS: The authors obtained fatality reports from participating medical examiners in the United States. Cases were identified as "drug-unrelated" when MDMA did not directly cause death (e.g., motor vehicle collision); deaths from drug toxicity were judged "drug-related." RESULTS: Thirty-eight (8%) of the surveyed medical examiners reported 102 deaths associated with MDMA use from 1999 to 2001. Ten percent of fatalities occurred in 1999 and 90% thereafter, representing a 400% relative increase. Victims tended to be young (mean age = 25), white (n = 87 [85%]), male (n = 70 [69%]), and otherwise healthy. Seventy-one (70%) deaths were drug-related (DR) and 31 (30%) were drug-unrelated (DU). Twenty-four (35%) DR deaths had a mean delay of 6.7 hours (95% CI = 5.1 to 8.2) in activating emergency medical services. Fifty-five DR cases (81%) were found in asystole and pronounced dead at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: The MDMA-associated fatal events typically occur in young, otherwise healthy individuals. MDMA's impact on the public health and safety of young adults and teenagers needs further assessment.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

The use of standardized patients within a procedural competency model to teach death disclosure.

OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and evaluate a multi-dimensional, interdisciplinary, educational training module that enables residents to deliver an effective and empathic death disclosure in the emergency setting. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) "Toolbox of Assessment Methods" to assess competency was adopted as the foundation of this project. METHODS: Sixteen emergency medicine residents, eight postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) and eight PGY-2, underwent a one-day training and evaluation exercise. The exercise consisted of: 1) a large-group didactic session, 2) a small-group didactic session, and 3) two standardized patient (SP) examinations. Changes in comfort levels, training helpfulness, and competency were measured. Inter-rater agreement between evaluators was examined. RESULTS: Trainees reported improvement in comfort levels and high levels of satisfaction regarding the helpfulness of the training. Good interrater agreement was obtained regarding resident competency to perform a death disclosure between the faculty and SP evaluators [kappa 0.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.33 to 0.88]. However, overall agreement among raters was poor (kappa 0.16; standard error = 0.26). This poor agreement reflected a lack of agreement between resident and SP evaluators (kappa 0.08; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.33) and resident and faculty evaluators (kappa -0.02; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: This project used the ACGME "Toolbox of Assessment Methods" to evaluate the competency of emergency medicine trainees to perform an effective and empathic death disclosure. The finding of inconsistent competency assessments by resident self-evaluators compared with those assessments made by faculty and standardized patients have important implications in future curricular design.

Death↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Measuring the dyspnea of decompensated heart failure with a visual analog scale: how much improvement is meaningful?

Patients presenting to the emergency department with heart failure are evaluated based on the subjective sensation of dyspnea. In this study, the authors sought to determine the change in dyspnea, measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), which is associated with a meaningful change in the patient's perception and the effect of dyspnea severity on the VAS. In this prospective, observational study the authors defined a meaningful change in VAS dyspnea as the difference between VAS scores when patients reported "a little less difficulty breathing" or "a little more difficulty breathing." Seventy-four patients were evaluated, and the mean for a meaningful change in VAS was 21.1 mm (95% confidence interval, 12.3-29.9 mm). Patients that recorded higher index VAS scores had a significantly greater change in VAS. VAS scores and the changes with treatment provide the treating physician with another means to assess the effects of their interventions.

Dyspnea↗