Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jonathan B Orens

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan B Orens.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The predictive value and inter-observer variability of donor chest radiograph interpretation in lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Currently the relationship between the evaluation of the donor chest radiograph and the final disposition of potential donor lungs is unknown, yet potential lung donors receive frequent x-rays. We sought to clarify the role donor chest radiographs and donor lung acceptability. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 84 potential organ donors. Radiographs were reviewed separately by three thoracic surgeons and three pulmonologists and either accepted or rejected with no other information. Data was analyzed by Kappa statistic to judge inter-observer variance and it was compared to actual outcome to determine predictive value. RESULTS: The Kappa statistics for observer agreement was 0.149 among the surgeons, 0.510 among the pulmonologists, and 0.336 overall, representing slight, moderate and fair agreement respectively. The reviewers' decisions to accept or reject a lung concurred with the actual clinical outcome 64.2% of the time. The positive predictive value of an accept decision was found to be 78.3% and the negative predictive value of a reject decision was 36.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that evaluation of the donor chest x-ray is a highly subjective process and demonstrated the limited role the radiograph presently holds in the determination of organ suitability.

Case-Control Studies↗

Tracheostomy following lung transplantation predictors and outcomes.

The effect of tracheostomy on patients receiving lung transplantation is unknown. We reviewed our experience by performing a retrospective analysis on all lung transplant recipients at our institution. Patients were assigned to each study group based on whether or not they received a tracheostomy in the acute postoperative period. One hundred and fourteen lung transplants were performed, and 16 of those patients received a tracheostomy. In the tracheostomy group, more patients had undergone bilateral-lung transplantation (81% vs. 34%, p = 0.001), more required cardiopulmonary bypass (75% vs. 38%, p = 0.005), more acquired postoperative pneumonia (88% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), had greater reperfusion injury at 48 h (PaO2/FiO2 of 233 vs. 345, p = 0.047), had longer initial periods on the ventilator (21 +/- 7 vs. 2 +/- 0.5 days, p < 0.001), more required re-intubation (56% vs. 18%, p = 0.001), spent longer times in the intensive care unit (30 +/- 7 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.9 days, p < 0.001), and had longer lengths of stay (67 +/- 10 vs. 22 +/- 2 days, p < 0.001). Despite these differences between the two groups, a significant difference in survival at 180 days (75 vs. 81%) did not exist (p = 0.89). Although tracheostomy is more likely in sicker patients, it is not associated with poor long-term outcomes.

Adult↗

Pulmonary eosinophilia following lung transplantation for sarcoidosis in two patients.

Pulmonary eosinophilia is an uncommon problem in lung transplant recipients. We report the unique occurrence of two cases of pulmonary eosinophilia in pulmonary allografts for sarcoidosis. Both patients rapidly acquired bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after resolution of pulmonary eosinophilia. It is known that peripheral eosinophilia is a marker for pulmonary allograft rejection, but its potential in the pathogenesis of BOS is unclear.

Biopsy↗

Combined heart-single-lung transplantation: a unique operation for unique indications.

Combined heart-lung transplantation has been a proven therapeutic option for patients with end-stage cardiopulmonary disease since 1981. Occasional patients are not candidates to receive both lungs en bloc. We describe such a case and propose indications and a surgical technique and present the limited published experience of combined heart-single-lung transplantation.

Heart Diseases↗