Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John H Wasson

Publications and source records attributed to John H Wasson.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Psychometric update of the Functional Interference Estimate: a brief measure of pain functional interference.

The Functional Interference Estimate (FIE) is a brief, 5-item self-report measure that assesses the degree to which pain interferes with daily functioning. While the FIE has demonstrated reliability and validity with a small normative sample, not much is known about its reliability and validity with a broad sample of individuals with pain. The current study presents FIE score means, variability estimates, reliability and validity data based on a large sample (n = 1,337) of primary care patients who report problematic pain. The FIE has excellent internal consistency and appears to have strong convergent validity with other well-established measures of function (e.g., SF-36 and Dartmouth COOP Charts). Because of its brevity and flexibility, the FIE may be a useful self-report measure of pain functional interference in clinical research on pain.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Ongoing distress from emotional trauma is related to pain, mood, and physical function in a primary care population.

The relationship of trauma history to physical and emotional functioning in primary care pain patients was examined. Data were drawn from a mailed screening questionnaire for a larger study designed to evaluate an intervention for improving pain management in primary care. Results indicated that 50.4% of the pain patients reported experiencing at least one previous emotionally traumatic event. Further, 31% of patients with trauma history continued to be bothered by that experience. Finally, patients who continued to be significantly bothered by the trauma reported more pain, emotional distress, poorer social functioning, and more difficulty with engaging in their daily activities than did patients with either no trauma history or who had a trauma history but did not have bothersome thoughts of the trauma. These preliminary findings suggest that the experience of trauma alone was not related to additional impairments in physical and psychosocial functioning. However, the report that one continued to be bothered by thoughts of a trauma was associated with greater impairments in functioning.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Microsystems in health care: Part 2. Creating a rich information environment.

BACKGROUND: A rich information environment supports the functioning of the small, functional, frontline units--the microsystems--that provide most health care to most people. Three settings represent case examples of how clinical microsystems use data in everyday practice to provide high-quality and cost-effective care. CASES: At The Spine Center at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, a patient value compass, a one-page health status report, is used to determine if the provided care and services are meeting the patient's needs. In Summit, New Jersey, Overlook Hospital's emergency department (ED) uses uses real-time process monitoring on patient care cycle times, quality and productivity indicator tracking, and patient and customer satisfaction tracking. These data streams create an information pool that is actively used in this ED icrosystem--minute by minute, hourly, daily, weekly, and annually--to analyze performance patterns and spot flaws that require action. The Shock Trauma Intensive Care Unit (STRICU), Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, uses a data system to monitor the "wired" patient remotely and share information at any time in real time. Staff can complete shift reports in 10 minutes. DISCUSSION: Information exchange is the interface that connects staff to patients and staff to staff within the microsystem; microsystem to microsystem; and microsystem to macro-organization.

Database Management Systems↗
PubMed2003

Microsystems in health care: Part 3. Planning patient-centered services.

BACKGROUND: Strategic focus on the clinical microsystems--the small, functional, frontline units that provide most health care to most people--is essential to designing the most efficient, population-based services. The starting place for designing or redesigning of clinical microsystems is to evaluate the four P's: the patient subpopulations that are served by the microsystem, the people who work together in the microsystem, the processes the microsystem uses to provide services, and the patterns that characterize the microsystem's functioning. GETTING STARTED: DIAGNOSING AND TREATING A CLINICAL MICROSYSTEM: Methods and tools have been developed for microsystem leaders and staff to use to evaluate the four P's--to assess their microsystem and design tests of change for improvement and innovation. PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: Based on its assessment--or diagnosis--a microsystem can help itself improve the things that need to be done better. Planning services is designed to decrease unnecessary variation, facilitate informed decision making, promote efficiency by continuously removing waste and rework, create processes and systems that support staff, and design smooth, effective, and safe patient care services that lead to measurably improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The design of services leads to critical analysis of the resources needed for the right person to deliver the right care, in the right way, at the right time.

Efficiency, Organizational↗
PubMed2003

Microsystems in health care: Part 4. Planning patient-centered care.

BACKGROUND: Clinical microsystems are the essential building blocks of all health systems. At the heart of an effective microsystem is a productive interaction between an informed, activated patient and a prepared, proactive practice staff. Support, which increases the patient's ability for self-management, is an essential result of a productive interaction. This series on high-performing clinical microsystems is based on interviews and site visits to 20 clinical microsystems in the United States. This fourth article in the series describes how high-performing microsystems design and plan patient-centered care. PLANNING PATIENT-CENTERED CARE: Well-planned, patient-centered care results in improved practice efficiency and better patient outcomes. However, planning this care is not an easy task. Excellent planned care requires that the microsystem have services that match what really matters to a patient and family and protected time to reflect and plan. Patient self-management support, clinical decision support, delivery system design, and clinical information systems must be planned to be effective, timely, and efficient for each individual patient and for all patients. CONCLUSION: Excellent planned services and planned care are attainable today in microsystems that understand what really matters to a patient and family and have the capacity to provide services to meet the patient's needs.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗
PubMed2002

Microsystems in health care: Part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units.

BACKGROUND: Clinical microsystems are the small, functional, front-line units that provide most health care to most people. They are the essential building blocks of larger organizations and of the health system. They are the place where patients and providers meet. The quality and value of care produced by a large health system can be no better than the services generated by the small systems of which it is composed. METHODS: A wide net was cast to identify and study a sampling of the best-quality, best-value small clinical units in North America. Twenty microsystems, representing different component parts of the health system, were examined from December 2000 through June 2001, using qualitative methods supplemented by medical record and finance reviews. RESULTS: The study of the 20 high-performing sites generated many best practice ideas (processes and methods) that microsystems use to accomplish their goals. Nine success characteristics were related to high performance: leadership, culture, macro-organizational support of microsystems, patient focus, staff focus, interdependence of care team, information and information technology, process improvement, and performance patterns. These success factors were interrelated and together contributed to the microsystem's ability to provide superior, cost-effective care and at the same time create a positive and attractive working environment. CONCLUSIONS: A seamless, patient-centered, high-quality, safe, and efficient health system cannot be realized without the transformation of the essential building blocks that combine to form the care continuum.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Technology for community health alliances.

A community health alliance brings together divergent interests within a community for the betterment of personal and population health. In this report we describe how a community responsive strategy in Chicago is facilitating the improvement of healthcare by providing local information of what needs to be done, supporting change at the practice level to meet these needs, and initiating community-wide approaches to manage prevalent and important needs without waiting for direct involvement of health professionals.

Chicago↗
PubMedDate not supplied

An introduction to technology for patient-centered, collaborative care.

"Patient-centered, collaborative care" is healthcare jargon. But underlying the jargon is the principle that a patient who receives such care strongly agrees that "I receive exactly the healthcare I want and need exactly when and how I want and need it." Currently only about 1 in 4 Americans who have adequate financial resources can make this claim. Think of a pyramid. At the apex is the highest level of "patient-centered, collaborative care." At the base are measures about "what's the matter" (from the clinical perspective) and "what matters" (from the patient perspective). As patients and clinicians act collaboratively on these measures, they climb closer to the apex of the pyramid. Given the realities of healthcare in the Unites States, should busy professionals take time to think about ways to climb pyramids? In this "Introduction" we describe why the answer to this rhetorical question ought to be "yes." In the articles that comprise this issue, readers will learn how technology that supports patient-centered, collaborative care can help bridge the gap between desirable goals and limited time. All the authors understand technology (such as hardware and software), and the way humans use the technology (called techne) will not overcome the many obstacles to the attainment of patient-centered, collaborative care. Nevertheless, we are hopeful that the examples described in these articles suggest ways that significant progress toward patient-centered, collaborative care can be made. The articles are practical. The results are persuasive. It is worth the climb!

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Patients report positive impacts of collaborative care.

Collaborative Care refers to a partnership between healthcare professionals and patients who feel confident to manage their health conditions. Using an Internet-based assessment of health needs and healthcare quality, we surveyed 24,609 adult Americans aged 19 to 69 who had common chronic diseases or significant dysfunction. In these patients, we examined the association of Collaborative Care with specific measures for treatment effect, disease control, prevention, and economic impacts. These measures were adjusted for respondents' demographic characteristics, burden of illness, health behaviors, and overall quality of healthcare. Only 21% of respondents participated in good Collaborative Care, 36% attained fair Collaborative Care, and 43% experienced poor Collaborative Care. Regardless of overall care quality or the respondents' personal characteristics, burden of illness, or health behaviors, good Collaborative Care was associated with better control of blood pressure, blood glucose level, serum cholesterol level, and treatment effectiveness for pain and emotional problems. Some preventive actions were better, and some adverse economic impacts of illness were mitigated.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Resource planning for patient-centered, collaborative care.

In this article, we use self-reported information from 13,271 older adults and the results from several controlled trials to construct a planned-care management strategy that cuts across diseases and conditions and also addresses health disparities attributed to low socioeconomic status. Three strata result from the interaction of patients' financial status, the presence or absence of bothersome pain and psychosocial problems, and their confidence with self-care. A majority of ambulatory patients generally fall in the first stratum. More resources are required in the 2 remaining strata to attain patient-centered, collaborative care. Because the planned-care management strategy is behaviorally sophisticated, it is likely to be more efficient and effective than strategies based on concepts of disease management that focus on either a single disease or groupings of patients who are "high utilizers" of healthcare. We conclude that modern technologies and related approaches make resource planning for patient-centered, collaborative care feasible and desirable.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The emergence of Ideal Micro Practices for patient-centered, collaborative care.

Ideal Micro Practices are capable of delivering patient-centered collaborative care. With respect to comparable adult patients in "usual" care settings, twice as many patients who use Ideal Micro Practices report they receive care that is "exactly what they want and need exactly when and how they want and need it" (68% vs 35%). Compared to usual care, these very small, low-overhead practices are more likely to have patients report very high levels of continuity (98% vs 88%), efficiency (95% vs 73%), and access (72% vs 53%). Patient ratings of very good information (83% vs 67%) and clinician awareness of pain or emotional problem are also higher (87% vs 69%). However, only a slim majority of patients using Ideal Micro Practices report that they are confident in their ability to manage and control their health problems or concerns. Ideal Micro Practices are sharing new tools and approaches to better understand their patients' needs and increase patients' confidence in their ability to manage conditions. In addition, these practices are working collaboratively to standardize their approaches and make the essential elements of Ideal Micro Practice replicable.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Postscript: health disparity and collaborative care.

In this report, we compare healthcare processes for patients with low (n = 7467) and adequate financial status (n = 43,701) after adjustment for age, gender, burden of illness, and health behaviors. Patients with low financial status were 10% to 30% less likely to report good service and collaborative care; they report that markers of disease management and prevention were 7% to 18% below the levels of patients with adequate income. From the patient perspective, these results confirm that inadequate financial status has a broad and adverse influence on health and healthcare. Technology for patient-centered, collaborative care alone will not remedy the problem of health disparity.

Cooperative Behavior↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Technical notes: when all things are not equal.

This article addresses 2 questions. First, how useful is adult patients' information about health and healthcare when they use the Internet for a "health checkup"? We find that patietns' reports are very strongly associated with medical record information for blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood glucose. Second, what are the biases in information from Internet respondents? Although we find that "health checkup" Internet users seem to be representative for patients in actual practice, much more research will be needed to fully address this question.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A controlled trial of methods for managing pain in primary care patients with or without co-occurring psychosocial problems.

PURPOSE: Pain, a common reason for visits to primary care physicians, is often not well managed. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of pain management interventions suitable for primary care physicians. METHODS: Patients from 14 rural primary care practices (47 physicians) who reported diverse pain problems with (n = 644) or without (n = 693) psychosocial problems were randomized to usual-care or intervention groups. All patients in the intervention group received information tailored to their problems and concerns (INFO). These patients' physicians received feedback about their patients' problems and concerns (FEED). A nurse-educator (NE) telephoned patients with pain and psychosocial problems to teach problem-solving strategies and basic pain management skills. Outcomes were assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form and the Functional Interference Estimate at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: Patients with pain and psychosocial problems randomized to INFOFEED+NE significantly improved on the bodily pain (P = .011), role physical (P = .025), vitality (P <.001), role emotional (P = .048), and the Functional Interference Estimate (P = .027) scales compared with usual-care patients at 6 months. These improvements were maintained at the 12-month assessment even though these patients had received, on average, only 3 telephone calls. Compared with usual-care patients, at 6 months patients who received INFOFEED alone experienced minimal improvements that were not sustained at the 12-month assessment. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with pain and psychosocial problems, telephone-based assistance resulted in significant, sustained benefit in pain and psychosocial problems.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prostate biopsies in men with limited life expectancy.

CONTEXT: Authorities discourage prostate screening in men who are likely to die from causes other than prostate cancer. PRACTICE PATTERN EXAMINED: Use of prostate biopsy-a proxy for screening-in men aged 65 and older with limited life expectancy (i.e., estimated to be less than 10 years). DATA SOURCE: Five percent samples of Part A (hospital) and Part B (physician) Medicare claims for 1993 through 1997. RESULTS: 22% of all Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a prostate biopsy had a limited life expectancy, corresponding to a rate of 1420 biopsies per 100,000. This rate did not change significantly between 1993 and 1997. For men with a life expectancy greater than 10 years, the biopsy rate was 2,360 per 100,000. Among men with limited life expectancy, in the year following the biopsy, 1.6% had radical prostatectomy and 2.3% had external-beam radiation. Thirty-nine percent were hospitalized. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of prostate biopsies are being performed in men with a life expectancy of less than 10 years. These men are unlikely to benefit from the biopsy or subsequent treatment.

Aged↗