Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joel R Peck

Publications and source records attributed to Joel R Peck.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Altruism, sex, and inbreeding when the genotype-phenotype map is additive.

Recently published theoretical results suggest that, in a sexual population, when genotypes code for phenotypes in a complex manner, it is possible for altruistic genotypes to spread through a metapopulation (i.e. through a collection of subpopulations). This spread tends to occur during periods when the environment deteriorates throughout the metapopulation. By contrast, under asexual reproduction, non-altruistic genotypes seem to be favoured, at least when subpopulations are substantial in size. The most relevant previous study makes use of Kauffman and Levin's "NK model" as a way to relate genotypes to fitness. Unfortunately, there are both conceptual and technical problems with the application of the NK model to populations that contain many different genotypes (e.g. polymorphic diploid populations with more than a few loci under selection). The present study presents a more tractable and biologically plausible model to study the causal relationship between sexual reproduction and altruism. In particular, phenotypes are determined by additive interactions among alleles at different loci in a diploid genome, with up to 200 loci under selection. In addition, subpopulations are substantially larger than those considered in the most relevant previous work. The results show that, so long as there are multiple "fitness peaks" in "phenotype space", the additive genotype-phenotype map leads to results that are similar to those from the NK model. Various parameters are manipulated in an effort to discover the determinants of altruistic and non-altruistic outcomes. The findings should facilitate further investigations, and they should help to establish the plausibility of the suggested relationship between sexual reproduction and altruism. The results also suggest that inbreeding can lead to a similar result as asexuality. That is, inbreeding seems to enhance the probability that altruistic phenotypes will be eliminated.

Altruism↗

Sex causes altruism. Altruism causes sex. Maybe.

This study presents a mathematical model in which the fitness of an individual depends on the individual's genotype (individual effects) and on the genotypes of other members of the individual's local group (group effects). The findings suggest that, if phenotypes are a result of complex interactions between genes at different loci, then fitness-enhancing group effects may become common in sexual populations. The spread of fitness-enhancing group effects is facilitated when environmental conditions sometimes deteriorate temporarily. This is so even if the genotypes with the highest group effects also tend to have relatively low individual effects. In this sense, the process described here can lead to the evolution of altruism. By contrast, when populations are asexual it appears that group effects are much less important in determining the outcome of evolution. Thus, in nature, asexual populations may tend to be characterized by more antagonistic interactions than those that typically prevail when reproduction is sexual. This might help to explain why asexual lineages are prone to rapid extinction.

Altruism↗

Adaptation and species range.

Phase III of Sewall Wright's shifting-balance process involves the spread of a superior genotype throughout a structured population. However, a number of authors have suggested that this sort of adaptive change is unlikely under biologically plausible conditions. We studied relevant mathematical models, and the results suggest that the concerns about phase III of the shifting-balance process are justified, but only if environmental conditions are stable. If environmental conditions change in a way that alters species range, then phase III can be effective, leading to an enhancement of adaptedness throughout a structured population.

Adaptation, Biological↗