Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joao G Amaral

Publications and source records attributed to Joao G Amaral.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Percutaneous thoracic drainage in neonates: catheter drainage versus treatment with aspiration alone.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare thoracic drainage in neonates by using catheter and aspiration techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics board; informed consent from parents was waived. Retrospective review of 21 neonates (19 boys, two girls; mean gestational age, 39.3 weeks) who underwent percutaneous thoracic drainage during a 9-year period was performed. Data such as indication for drainage, type of drainage, age and weight at birth, corrected age and weight at the time of drainage, use of mechanical ventilation at the time of drainage, and outcomes were collected. Drainage was considered successful if the collection was treated without additional surgical or radiologic intervention. Fisher exact test and two-tailed unpaired student t test with a confidence level of 95% (unequal variances assumed) were used to compare neonates treated with a catheter and those treated with aspiration. RESULTS: Image-guided therapy was used to treat pleural effusion (29%, n = 6), chylothorax (24%, n = 5), empyema (19%, n = 4), pneumothorax (14%, n = 3), mediastinal seroma (10%, n = 3), and congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (5%, n = 1). Sixteen (76%) infants were treated with catheter placement, with a success rate of 81% (13 of 16). Five (24%) infants were treated with simple aspiration with no success. The difference in success rates was significant (P = .003). There was no significant difference between the catheter placement and aspiration groups in terms of average age, average weight, and percentage dependent on mechanical ventilation. One complication (cellulitis) was directly related to catheter drainage. In cases where treatment was successful, the mean length of the chest tube placement was 13.5 days, and there were no deaths at follow-up. In cases where treatment failed, the long-term mortality rate was 50% (four of eight). CONCLUSION: Image-guided percutaneous thoracic drainage success rates are improved if drainage catheters are placed rather than if aspiration alone is performed.

Catheterization↗

Percutaneous US-guided biopsies of peripheral pulmonary lesions in children.

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of diseases in children can present with peripheral lung lesions. Minimally invasive percutaneous techniques are preferred diagnostic tools when thoracoscopic resection is not indicated. Significant improvements in US resolution have increased the range of its applications for many diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the adequacy and safety of US-guided biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the clinical, imaging and pathology records of 33 children (13 females and 20 males) in whom 38 US-guided percutaneous lung lesion biopsies had been performed between January 1996 and March 2004. Their mean age was 8.3 years (range 1-19 years, median 6.6 years). All procedures were done under general anesthesia and controlled respiration. Two techniques were used: a single-needle technique and a coaxial-needle technique. In each case, the data recorded included age, sex, lesion's location and size, number of cores, pathology results (adequate, inadequate and indeterminate), and complications. In order to categorize the sample, the lesions were divided into four groups based on the size of the pleural surface: group 1 1-5 mm, group 2 6-10 mm, group 3 11-20 mm, and group 4 21 mm or more. RESULTS: The mean pleural surface size of the lesions was 12 mm (range 2.3-24 mm). The coaxial-needle technique was used for 13 biopsies and the single-needle technique for 25 biopsies. Of the 38 biopsies, 32 were considered adequate (technical success 84%), 4 were truly inadequate, and 2 were indeterminate at the time of the biopsy, requiring surgical biopsy for confirmation. Minor complications occurred following 44% of the procedures, including: pain (n=5), small pneumothorax (n=4), pulmonary hematoma (n=4), atelectasis (n=4), small hemothorax (n=3), respiratory distress (n=1) and hemoptysis (n=1). No major complications occurred. No significant correlation was found between the size of the pleural surface and technical success (P=0.106) or the incidence of complications (P=0.23). Minor complications occurred following 6 out of 13 procedures using the coaxial-needle technique (16% of total) and following 11 out of 25 procedures using the single-needle technique (28% of total), with no statistically significant difference (P=0.1081). CONCLUSION: This small retrospective study suggests that US-guided lung biopsies are a safe and adequate method to sample peripheral pulmonary lesions in children, with a high rate of technical success and low morbidity, even for lesions with a small pleural surface (<5 mm).

Adolescent↗

Image-guided therapy and minimally invasive surgery in children: a merging future.

Minimally invasive image-guided therapy for children, also known as pediatric interventional radiology (PIR), is a new and exciting field of medicine. Two key elements that helped the rapid evolution and dissemination of this specialty were the creation of devices appropriate for the pediatric population and the development of more cost-effective and minimally invasive techniques. Despite its clear advantages to children, many questions are raised regarding who should be performing these procedures. Unfortunately, this is a gray zone with no clear answer. Surgeons fear that interventional radiologists will take over additional aspects of the surgical/procedural spectrum. Interventional radiologists, on the other hand, struggle to avoid becoming highly specialized technicians rather than physicians who are responsible for complete care of their patients. In this article, we briefly discuss some of the current aspects of minimally invasive image-guided therapy in children and innovations that are expected to be incorporated into clinical practice in the near future. Then, we approach the current interspecialty battles over the control of this field and suggest some solutions to these issues. Finally, we propose the development of a generation of physicians with both surgical and imaging skills.

Child↗

Percutaneous cecostomy: updates in technique and patient care.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the authors' 7-year experience with the percutaneous cecostomy procedure and the long-term outcome of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1994, 163 tube cecostomies for fecal incontinence were performed in patients aged 2-23 years and who weighed 8-72 kg (mean, 32.2 kg). Underlying conditions included spina bifida (n = 106), imperforate anus (n = 53), Klippel-Feil deformity (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 1), Hirschsprung disease (n = 1), and paraplegia (n = 1). Ventriculoperitoneal shunts were present in 85 (52%) of the 163 patients. The authors have followed up 124 (76%) of the 163 cecostomy patients. Information regarding enema technique, satisfaction with the procedure, postprocedure problems, and long-term outcome of the procedure was obtained by interviewing either the patients or the parents. RESULTS: Tube placement was successful in all patients. One hundred ten (89%) of the 124 patients experienced a substantial decrease in the frequency of soiling accidents. The vast majority of patients expressed satisfaction with the procedure; 117 (94%) of the 124 patients rated the cecostomy procedure as better than the bowel control procedure used before. Late complications of the procedure included granulation tissue and accidentally dislodged tubes. Four patients elected to have their tubes removed for aesthetic and tube management reasons. There was no mortality related to the procedure, although one patient died of pneumonia 5 years later. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous cecostomy procedure is a safe and effective method for treating fecal incontinence.

Adolescent↗

Pediatric interventional venous access.

Venous access for therapy in sick children is very important, but sometimes also extremely challenging. With several advances in imaging modalities, the interventional radiologist can certainly help in these situations. This article reviews the indications, technique, and complications related to short- (peripherally inserted central catheter) and long-term (central venous lines, Port-a-catheters) venous accesses in children. A brief commentary is also made about retrieval of fragmented lines.

Catheterization, Central Venous↗