Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jin-Long Huang.
This paper describes a case of 65-year-old woman with primary chylopericardium. She received Tc-99m phytate lymphoscintigraphy after pericardial drainage and was managed with medium-chain triglycerides without surgical intervention. This was the first reported case of primary chylopericardium diagnosed with Tc-99m phytate lymphoscintigraphy.
The exact reentrant circuit of the verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left VT with a RBBB configuration remains unclear. Furthermore, if the fascicle of left bundle branch is involved in the reentrant circuit has not been well studied. Forty-nine patients with verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left VT underwent electrophysiological study and RF catheter ablation. Group I included 11 patients (10 men, 1 woman; mean age 25 +/- 8 years) with left anterior fascicular block (4 patients), or left posterior fascicular block (7 patients) during sinus rhythm. Group II included 38 patients (29 men, 9 women; mean age 35 +/- 16 years) without fascicular block during sinus rhythm. Duration of QRS complex during sinus rhythm before RF catheter ablation in group I patients was significant longer than that of group II patients (104 +/- 12 vs 95 +/- 11 ms, respectively, P=0.02). Duration of QRS complex during VT was similar between group I and group II patients (141 +/- 13 vs 140 +/- 14 ms, respectively, P=0.78). Transitional zones of QRS complexes in the precordial leads during VT were similar between group I and group II patients. After ablation, the QRS duration did not prolong in group I or group II patients (104 +/- 11 vs 95 +/- 10 ms, P=0.02); fascicular block did not occur in group II patients. Duration and transitional zone of QRS complex during VT were similar between the two groups, and new fascicular block did not occur after ablation. These findings suggest the fascicle of left bundle branch may be not involved in the antegrade limb of reentry circuit in idiopathic left VT.
INTRODUCTION: High recurrence rate is still a major problem associated with ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Most of the recurrences occur within 6 months after ablation. The characteristics of very late recurrent AF (>12 months after ablation) have not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients with drug-refractory AF underwent successful focal ablation or isolation of AF foci. After the first ablation procedure, Holter monitoring and event recorders were used to evaluate symptomatic recurrent AF. A second ablation procedure was recommended if the antiarrhythmic drugs could not control recurrent AF. During long-term follow-up (mean 30 +/- 11 months, up to 51 months), 70 patients had recurrent AF, including 13 patients (6%) with very late (>12 months) recurrent AF (group 1) and 57 patients (28%) with late (within 12 months after ablation) recurrent AF (group 2). Group 1 patients had a significantly lower incidence of multiple (> or = 2) AF foci (23% vs 63%, P = 0.02) than group 2 patients. In addition, the incidence of antiarrhythmic drugs use (38% vs 84%, P = 0.001) to maintain sinus rhythm after the first episode of recurrent AF was significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 patients, and the incidence of a second intervention procedure (8% vs 35%, P = 0.051) tended to be lower in group 1 than group 2 patients. CONCLUSION: The incidence of very late recurrent AF after ablation of paroxysmal AF is very low, and the clinical outcome of patients with very late recurrent AF is benign.
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at delineating the reentrant circuit of right atrial (RA) upper loop re-entry using noncontact three-dimensional mapping. BACKGROUND: Various forms of atypical atrial flutter including lower loop re-entry and left atrial flutter have been demonstrated. However, little is known about upper loop re-entry in the RA. METHODS: The study population consisted of eight patients (65 +/- 12 years, seven men) with atypical atrial flutter. Right atrial activation during atrial flutter was visualized using a noncontact mapping system (EnSite-3000 with Clarity Software, St. Paul, Minnesota) for a three-dimensional reconstruction of the endocardial depolarization. The narrowest part of the re-entrant circuit was targeted using radiofrequency catheter ablation. RESULTS: Noncontact mapping showed macro-re-entry confined to the RA free wall with RA activation time accounting for 100% of the cycle length (214 +/- 21 ms) in all eight patients. Two patients had counterclockwise activation, and six patients had clockwise activation around the central obstacle, which was composed of the crista terminalis, the area of functional block, and superior vena cava. The lower turn-around points were located at the conduction gap in the crista terminalis. Radiofrequency linear ablation of the conduction gap in the crista terminalis was performed and eliminated atrial flutter in six patients without recurrence during a follow-up of 3.2 +/- 1.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Atypical atrial flutter could arise from upper loop re-entry in the RA with conduction through the gap in the crista terminalis. Radiofrequency linear ablation of the conduction gap was effective in eliminating this atrial arrhythmia.
The aim of the study was to define the factors that may predict the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in patients with idiopathic VT with a QRS morphology of LBBB. Endocardial mapping and RF ablation from the RVOT were performed in 35 patients (14 men, mean age 41 +/- 14 years), and VT was successfully ablated in 30 patients. There was no significant difference with regard to clinical characteristics and electrophysiological findings between patients with successful and failed ablation. The VTs with successful ablation showed an rS (n = 16) or QS (n = 14) pattern in lead V1, and all five VTs with failed ablation showed an rS pattern in lead V1. Although the absence of an R wave in lead V1 did not differ between patients with successful and failed ablation (P = 0.13), the absence of an R wave in lead V1 predicted VT successfully ablated from the RVOT (positive predictive value 100%; negative predictive value 24%). The VTs with successful ablation had a median precordial transitional zone at lead V4 (range V3-V6), whereas all five VTs with failed ablation had precordial transition zones at lead V3 (P = 0.004). Furthermore, a presence of an R wave in lead V1 associated with a precordial transition zone at lead V3 predicted VT not successfully ablated from the RVOT (positive predictive value 100%; negative predictive value 100%). In conclusion, some VTs with LBBB and inferior or normal axis cannot be ablated from the RVOT. The presence of an R wave in lead V1 associated with a precordial transition zone at lead V3 suggest that some VTs may not arise from the RVOT.