Biomedical subjects

Jeroen Essers

Publications and source records attributed to Jeroen Essers.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks.

Repair of interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) requires multiple-strand incisions to separate the two covalently attached strands of DNA. It is unclear how these incisions are generated. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) have been identified as intermediates in ICL repair, but enzymes responsible for producing these intermediates are unknown. Here we show that Mus81, a component of the Mus81-Eme1 structure-specific endonuclease, is involved in generating the ICL-induced DSBs in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells in S phase. Given the DNA junction cleavage specificity of Mus81-Eme1 in vitro, DNA damage-stalled replication forks are suitable in vivo substrates. Interestingly, generation of DSBs from replication forks stalled due to DNA damage that affects only one of the two DNA strands did not require Mus81. Furthermore, in addition to a physical interaction between Mus81 and the homologous recombination protein Rad54, we show that Mus81(-/-) Rad54(-/-) ES cells were as hypersensitive to ICL agents as Mus81(-/-) cells. We propose that Mus81-Eme1- and Rad54-mediated homologous recombination are involved in the same DNA replication-dependent ICL repair pathway.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Analysis of DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mice.

During the last years significant new insights have been gained into the mechanism and biological relevance of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in relation to genome stability. DSBs are a highly toxic DNA lesion, because they can lead to chromosome fragmentation, loss and translocations, eventually resulting in cancer. DSBs can be induced by cellular processes such as V(D)J recombination or DNA replication. They can also be introduced by exogenous agents DNA damaging agents such as ionizing radiation or mitomycin C. During evolution several pathways have evolved for the repair of these DSBs. The most important DSB repair mechanisms in mammalian cells are nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination. By using an undamaged repair template, homologous recombination ensures accurate DSB repair, whereas the untemplated nonhomologous end-joining pathway does not. Although both pathways are active in mammals, the relative contribution of the two repair pathways to genome stability differs in the different cell types. Given the potential differences in repair fidelity, it is of interest to determine the relative contribution of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining to DSB repair. In this review, we focus on the biological relevance of DSB repair in mammalian cells and the potential overlap between nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination in different tissues.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

DNA damage repair: anytime, anywhere?

Regulation of the DNA damage response is tightly connected to transcription and replication. These DNA transacting processes share common factors and use similar strategies to exert their function. However, unlike replication and transcription, DNA repair systems may be required anywhere, and at any time, whenever DNA damage occurs in the cell nucleus. This raises questions concerning the spatiotemporal organization of genome caretaking. Currently, quantitative live cell imaging techniques combined with methods to induce local DNA damage in a small region of the nucleus are contributing substantially to unravelling the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular response to DNA damage.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Analysis of DNA recombination and repair proteins in living cells by photobleaching microscopy.

DNA double strand break repair through homologous recombination has been shown biochemically to require the coordinated action of the RAD52 group of proteins, including the DNA strand exchange protein Rad51. We have started to develop experimental tools to investigate the close cooperation of homologous recombination proteins in living cells, where proteins operate in the context of chromatin and in the presence of other nuclear processes. This chapter describes in detail methods to establish cell lines stably expressing green fluorescent protein -tagged recombination proteins and photobleaching techniques to investigate the behavior of the proteins with the use of live cell video microscopy. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), fluorescence loss after photobleaching (FLIP), and their combination in the same cell are useful techniques to gain insights into the dynamic behavior of the recombination proteins. Parameters such as diffusion rates and mobile versus immobile fractions before and after DNA damage induction can be obtained. In addition, residence times of recombination proteins at sites of DNA damage can be determined. Through the application of FRAP and FLIP it is possible to establish whether proteins are present in the same multiprotein complex, whether this is affected by DNA damage induction, and whether proteins dynamically associate with and dissociate from sites of DNA damage.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Differential contributions of mammalian Rad54 paralogs to recombination, DNA damage repair, and meiosis.

Homologous recombination is a versatile DNA damage repair pathway requiring Rad51 and Rad54. Here we show that a mammalian Rad54 paralog, Rad54B, displays physical and functional interactions with Rad51 and DNA that are similar to those of Rad54. While ablation of Rad54 in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells leads to a mild reduction in homologous recombination efficiency, the absence of Rad54B has little effect. However, the absence of both Rad54 and Rad54B dramatically reduces homologous recombination efficiency. Furthermore, we show that Rad54B protects ES cells from ionizing radiation and the interstrand DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C. Interestingly, at the ES cell level the paralogs do not display an additive or synergic interaction with respect to mitomycin C sensitivity, yet animals lacking both Rad54 and Rad54B are dramatically sensitized to mitomycin C compared to either single mutant. This suggests that the paralogs possibly function in a tissue-specific manner. Finally, we show that Rad54, but not Rad54B, is needed for a normal distribution of Rad51 on meiotic chromosomes. Thus, even though the paralogs have similar biochemical properties, genetic analysis in mice uncovered their nonoverlapping roles.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Inactivation of RAD52 aggravates RAD54 defects in mice but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

RAD52 and RAD54 genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for double-strand break repair through homologous recombination and show epistatic interactions i.e., single and double mutant strains are equally sensitive to DNA damaging agents. In here we combined mutations in RAD52 and RAD54 homologs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and mice. The analysis of mutant strains in S. pombe demonstrated nearly identical sensitivities of rhp54, rad22A and rad22B double and triple mutants to X-rays, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum and hydroxyurea. In this respect, the fission yeast homologs of RAD54 and RAD52 closely resemble their counterparts in S. cerevisiae. To verify if inactivation of RAD52 affects the DNA damage sensitivities of RAD54 deficient mice, several endpoints were studied in double mutant mice and in bone marrow cells derived from these animals. Haemopoietic depression in bone marrow and the formation of micronuclei after in vivo exposure to mitomycine C (MMC) was not increased in either single or double mutant mice in comparison to wildtype animals. The induction of sister chromatid exchanges in splenocytes was slightly reduced in the RAD54 mutant. A similar reduction was detected in the double mutant. However, a deficiency of RAD52 exacerbates the MMC survival of RAD54 mutant mice and also has a distinct effect on the survival of bone marrow cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. These findings may be explained by additive defects in HR in the double mutant but may also indicate a more prominent role for single-strand annealing in the absence of Rad54.

Alkylating Agents↗

PubMed2005

Ionizing radiation-induced foci formation of mammalian Rad51 and Rad54 depends on the Rad51 paralogs, but not on Rad52.

Homologous recombination is of major importance for the prevention of genomic instability during chromosome duplication and repair of DNA damage, especially double-strand breaks. Biochemical experiments have revealed that during the process of homologous recombination the RAD52 group proteins, including Rad51, Rad52 and Rad54, are involved in an essential step: formation of a joint molecule between the broken DNA and the intact repair template. Accessory proteins for this reaction include the Rad51 paralogs and BRCA2. The significance of homologous recombination for the cell is underscored by the evolutionary conservation of the Rad51, Rad52 and Rad54 proteins from yeast to humans. Upon treatment of cells with ionizing radiation, the RAD52 group proteins accumulate at the sites of DNA damage into so-called foci. For the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, foci formation of Rad51 and Rad54 is abrogated in the absence of Rad52, while Rad51 foci formation does occur in the absence of the Rad51 paralog Rad55. By contrast, we show here that in mammalian cells, Rad52 is not required for foci formation of Rad51 and Rad54. Furthermore, radiation-induced foci formation of Rad51 and Rad54 is impaired in all Rad51 paralog and BRCA2 mutant cell lines tested, while Rad52 foci formation is not influenced by a mutation in any of these recombination proteins. Despite their evolutionary conservation and biochemical similarities, S. cerevisiae and mammalian Rad52 appear to differentially contribute to the DNA-damage response.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced foci of DNA damage repair proteins.

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination requires an extensive set of proteins. Among these proteins are Rad51 and Mre11, which are known to re-localize to sites of DNA damage into nuclear foci. Ionizing radiation-induced foci can be visualized by immuno-staining. Published data show a large variation in the number of foci-positive cells and number of foci per nucleus for specific DNA repair proteins. The experiments described here demonstrate that the time after induction of DNA damage influenced not only the number of foci-positive cells, but also the size of the individual foci. The dose of ionizing radiation influenced both the number of foci-positive cells and the number of foci per nucleus. Furthermore, ionizing radiation-induced foci formation depended on the cell cycle stage of the cells and the protein of interest that was investigated. Rad51 and Mre11 foci seemed to be mutually exclusive, though a small subset of cells did show co-localization of these proteins, which suggests a possible cooperation between the proteins at a specific moment during DNA repair.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Nuclear dynamics of PCNA in DNA replication and repair.

The DNA polymerase processivity factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is central to both DNA replication and repair. The ring-shaped homotrimeric PCNA encircles and slides along double-stranded DNA, acting as a "sliding clamp" that localizes proteins to DNA. We determined the behavior of green fluorescent protein-tagged human PCNA (GFP-hPCNA) in living cells to analyze its different engagements in DNA replication and repair. Photobleaching and tracking of replication foci revealed a dynamic equilibrium between two kinetic pools of PCNA, i.e., bound to replication foci and as a free mobile fraction. To simultaneously monitor PCNA action in DNA replication and repair, we locally inflicted UV-induced DNA damage. A surprisingly longer residence time of PCNA at damaged areas than at replication foci was observed. Using DNA repair mutants, we showed that the initial recruitment of PCNA to damaged sites was dependent on nucleotide excision repair. Local accumulation of PCNA at damaged regions was observed during all cell cycle stages but temporarily disappeared during early S phase. The reappearance of PCNA accumulation in discrete foci at later stages of S phase likely reflects engagements of PCNA in distinct genome maintenance processes dealing with stalled replication forks, such as translesion synthesis (TLS). Using a ubiquitination mutant of GFP-hPCNA that is unable to participate in TLS, we noticed a significantly shorter residence time in damaged areas. Our results show that changes in the position of PCNA result from de novo assembly of freely mobile replication factors in the nucleoplasmic pool and indicate different binding affinities for PCNA in DNA replication and repair.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Dynamics of relative chromosome position during the cell cycle.

The position of chromosomal neighborhoods in living cells was followed using three different methods for marking chromosomal domains occupying arbitrary locations in the nucleus; photobleaching of GFP-labeled histone H2B, local UV-marked DNA, and photobleaching of fluorescently labeled DNA. All methods revealed that global chromosomal organization can be reestablished through one cell division from mother to daughters. By simultaneously monitoring cell cycle stage in the cells in which relative chromosomal domain positions were tracked, we observed that chromosomal neighborhood organization is apparently lost in the early G1 phase of the cell cycle. However, the daughter cells eventually regain the general chromosomal organization pattern of their mothers, suggesting an active mechanism could be at play to reestablish chromosomal neighborhoods.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Mutation of the mouse Rad17 gene leads to embryonic lethality and reveals a role in DNA damage-dependent recombination.

Genetic defects in DNA repair mechanisms and cell cycle checkpoint (CCC) genes result in increased genomic instability and cancer predisposition. Discovery of mammalian homologs of yeast CCC genes suggests conservation of checkpoint mechanisms between yeast and mammals. However, the role of many CCC genes in higher eukaryotes remains elusive. Here, we report that targeted deletion of an N-terminal part of mRad17, the mouse homolog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad17 checkpoint clamp-loader component, resulted in embryonic lethality during early/mid-gestation. In contrast to mouse embryos, embryonic stem (ES) cells, isolated from mRad17(5'Delta/5'Delta) embryos, produced truncated mRad17 and were viable. These cells displayed hypersensitivity to various DNA-damaging agents. Surprisingly, mRad17(5'Delta/5'Delta) ES cells were able to arrest cell cycle progression upon induction of DNA damage. However, they displayed impaired homologous recombination as evidenced by a strongly reduced gene targeting efficiency. In addition to a possible role in DNA damage-induced CCC, based on sequence homology, our results indicate that mRad17 has a function in DNA damage-dependent recombination that may be responsible for the sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Involvement of mammalian Mus81 in genome integrity and tumor suppression.

Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease has been implicated in the rescue of stalled replication forks and the resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates in yeast. We used gene targeting to study the physiological requirements of Mus81 in mammals. Mus81-/- mice are viable and fertile, which indicates that mammalian Mus81 is not essential for recombination processes associated with meiosis. Mus81-deficient mice and cells were hypersensitive to the DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C but not to gamma-irradiation. Remarkably, both homozygous Mus81-/- and heterozygous Mus81+/- mice exhibited a similar susceptibility to spontaneous chromosomal damage and a profound and equivalent predisposition to lymphomas and other cancers. These studies demonstrate a critical role for the proper biallelic expression of the mammalian Mus81 in the maintenance of genomic integrity and tumor suppression.

Alleles↗

PubMed2004

Rad54 and DNA Ligase IV cooperate to maintain mammalian chromatid stability.

Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) represent the two major pathways of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in eukaryotic cells. NHEJ repairs DSBs by ligation of cognate broken ends irrespective of homologous flanking sequences, whereas HR repairs DSBs using an undamaged homologous template. Although both NHEJ and HR have been clearly implicated in the maintenance of genome stability, how these apparently independent and mechanistically distinct pathways are coordinated remains largely unexplored. To investigate the relationship between HR and NHEJ modes of DSB repair, we generated cells doubly deficient for the NHEJ factor DNA Ligase IV (Lig4) and the HR factor Rad54. We show that Lig4 and Rad54 cooperate to support cellular proliferation, repair spontaneous DSBs, and prevent chromosome and single chromatid aberrations. These findings demonstrate a role for NHEJ in the repair of DSBs that occur spontaneously during or after DNA replication, and reveal overlapping functions for NHEJ and Rad54-dependent HR in the repair of such DSBs.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Collaboration of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining factors for the survival and integrity of mice and cells.

Homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) are mechanistically distinct DNA repair pathways that contribute substantially to double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells. We have combined mutations in factors from both repair pathways, the HR protein Rad54 and the DNA-end-binding factor Ku80, which has a role in NHEJ. Rad54(-/-)Ku80(-/-) mice were severely compromised in their survival, such that fewer double mutants were born than expected, and only a small proportion of those born reached adulthood. However, double-mutant mice died at lower frequency from tumors than Ku80 single mutant mice, likely as a result of rapid demise at a young age from other causes. When challenged with an exogenous DNA damaging agent, ionizing radiation, double-mutant mice were exquisitely sensitive to low doses. Tissues and cells from double-mutant mice also showed indications of spontaneous DNA damage. Testes from some Rad54(-/-)Ku80(-/-) mice displayed enhanced apoptosis and reduced sperm production, and embryonic fibroblasts from Rad54(-/-)Ku80(-/-) animals accumulated foci of gamma-H2AX, a marker for DSBs. The substantially increased DNA damage response in the double mutants implies a cooperation of the two DSB repair pathways for survival and genomic integrity in the animal.

Aging↗

PubMed2004

Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains.

Interactions between ends from different DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can produce tumorigenic chromosome translocations. Two theories for the juxta-position of DSBs in translocations, the static "contact-first" and the dynamic "breakage-first" theory, differ fundamentally in their requirement for DSB mobility. To determine whether or not DSB-containing chromosome domains are mobile and can interact, we introduced linear tracks of DSBs in nuclei. We observed changes in track morphology within minutes after DSB induction, indicating movement of the domains. In a subpopulation of cells, the domains clustered. Juxtaposition of different DSB-containing chromosome domains through clustering, which was most extensive in G1 phase cells, suggests an adhesion process in which we implicate the Mre11 complex. Our results support the breakage-first theory to explain the origin of chromosomal translocations.

Alpha Particles↗

PubMed2003

Eme1 is involved in DNA damage processing and maintenance of genomic stability in mammalian cells.

Yeast and human Eme1 protein, in complex with Mus81, constitute an endonuclease that cleaves branched DNA structures, especially those arising during stalled DNA replication. We identified mouse Eme1, and show that it interacts with Mus81 to form a complex that preferentially cleaves 3'-flap structures and replication forks rather than Holliday junctions in vitro. We demonstrate that Eme1-/- embryonic stem (ES) cells are hypersensitive to the DNA cross-linking agents mitomycin C and cisplatin, but only mildly sensitive to ionizing radiation, UV radiation and hydroxyurea treatment. Mammalian Eme1 is not required for the resolution of DNA intermediates that arise during homologous recombination processes such as gene targeting, gene conversion and sister chromatid exchange (SCE). Unlike Blm-deficient ES cells, increased SCE was seen only following induced DNA damage in Eme1-deficient cells. Most importantly, Eme1 deficiency led to spontaneous genomic instability. These results reveal that mammalian Eme1 plays a key role in DNA repair and the maintenance of genome integrity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

CTG repeat instability and size variation timing in DNA repair-deficient mice.

Type 1 myotonic dystrophy is caused by the expansion of an unstable CTG repeat in the DMPK gene. We have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the CTG repeat instability by crossing transgenic mice carrying >300 unstable CTG repeats in their human chromatin environment with mice knockout for genes involved in various DNA repair pathways: Msh2 (mismatch repair), Rad52 and Rad54 (homologous recombination) and DNA-PKcs (non-homologous end-joining). Genes of the non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination pathways did not seem to affect repeat instability. Only lack of Rad52 led to a slight decrease in expansion range. Unexpectedly, the absence of Msh2 did not result in stabilization of the CTG repeats in our model. Instead, it shifted the instability towards contractions rather than expansions, both in tissues and through generations. Furthermore, we carefully analyzed repeat transmissions with different Msh2 genotypes to determine the timing of intergenerational instability. We found that instability over generations depends not only on parental germinal instability, but also on a second event taking place after fertilization.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Analysis of mouse Rad54 expression and its implications for homologous recombination.

Homologous recombination is one of the major pathways for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Important proteins in this pathway are Rad51 and Rad54. Rad51 forms a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that mediates pairing with and strand invasion of homologous duplex DNA with the assist of Rad54. We estimated that the nucleus of a mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells contains on average 4.7x10(5) Rad51 and 2.4x10(5) Rad54 molecules. Furthermore, we showed that the amount of Rad54 was subject to cell cycle regulation. We discuss our results with respect to two models that describe how Rad54 stimulates Rad51-mediated DNA strand invasion. The models differ in whether Rad54 functions locally or globally. In the first model, Rad54 acts in cis relative to the site of strand invasion. Rad54 coats the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament in stoichiometric amounts and binds to the target duplex DNA at the site that is homologous to the ssDNA in the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. Subsequently, it promotes duplex DNA unwinding. In the second model, Rad54 acts in trans relative to the site of strand invasion. Rad54 binds duplex DNA distant from the site that will be unwound. Translocation of Rad54 along the duplex DNA increases superhelical stress thereby promoting duplex DNA unwinding.

Animals↗