Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeremy Buhler

Publications and source records attributed to Jeremy Buhler.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Provably sensitive indexing strategies for biosequence similarity search.

Fast algorithms for pairwise biosequence similarity search frequently use filtering and indexing strategies to identify potential matches between a query sequence and a database. For the most part, these strategies are not informed by the substitution score matrices commonly used by comparison algorithms to assign numerical scores to pairs of aligned residues. Consequently, although many filtering strategies offer strong formal guarantees about their ability to detect pairs of sequences differing by few substitutions, these methods can make no guarantee of detecting pairs with high similarity scores. We describe a general technique, score simulation, to help resolve the tension between existing filtering techniques and the use of score matrices. Score simulation, using score matrices, maps ungapped similarity search problems to the simpler problem of finding pairs of strings that differ by few substitutions. Score simulation leads to indexing schemes for biosequences that permit efficient ungapped similarity search with arbitrary score matrices while maintaining strong formal guarantees of sensitivity. We introduce the LSH-ALL-PAIRS-SIM algorithm for finding local similarities in large biosequence collections and show that it is both computationally feasible and sensitive in practice.

Computational Biology↗

Finding motifs using random projections.

The DNA motif discovery problem abstracts the task of discovering short, conserved sites in genomic DNA. Pevzner and Sze recently described a precise combinatorial formulation of motif discovery that motivates the following algorithmic challenge: find twenty planted occurrences of a motif of length fifteen in roughly twelve kilobases of genomic sequence, where each occurrence of the motif differs from its consensus in four randomly chosen positions. Such "subtle" motifs, though statistically highly significant, expose a weakness in existing motif-finding algorithms, which typically fail to discover them. Pevzner and Sze introduced new algorithms to solve their (15,4)-motif challenge, but these methods do not scale efficiently to more difficult problems in the same family, such as the (14,4)-, (16,5)-, and (18,6)-motif problems. We introduce a novel motif-discovery algorithm, PROJECTION, designed to enhance the performance of existing motif finders using random projections of the input's substrings. Experiments on synthetic data demonstrate that PROJECTION remedies the weakness observed in existing algorithms, typically solving the difficult (14,4)-, (16,5)-, and (18,6)-motif problems. Our algorithm is robust to nonuniform background sequence distributions and scales to larger amounts of sequence than that specified in the original challenge. A probabilistic estimate suggests that related motif-finding problems that PROJECTION fails to solve are in all likelihood inherently intractable. We also test the performance of our algorithm on realistic biological examples, including transcription factor binding sites in eukaryotes and ribosome binding sites in prokaryotes.

Algorithms↗