Biomedical subjects

Jeremy B Badler

Publications and source records attributed to Jeremy B Badler.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Anticipatory movement timing using prediction and external cues.

Animals often make anticipatory movements to compensate for slow reaction times. Anticipatory movements can be timed using external, sensory cues, or by an internal prediction of when an event will occur. However, it is unknown whether external or internal cues dominate the anticipatory response when both are present. Smooth pursuit eye movements are generated by a motor system heavily influenced by anticipation. We measured pursuit to determine how its timing was influenced when both a predictable event and a visual cue were present. Monkeys tracked a moving target that appeared at a constant time relative to the onset of a fixation point. At a randomized time before target onset, the fixation point disappeared, creating a temporal "gap" that cued impending target motion. We found that the gap onset cue and prediction of target onset together determined pursuit initiation time. We also investigated whether prediction could override the gap onset cue or vice versa by manipulating target onset and, hence, the duration of time that the animal had to estimate to predict it. When target motion began earlier, the pursuit system relied more on prediction to trigger a movement, whereas the cue was more often used when the target moved later. Pursuit latency in previous trials partially accounted for this behavior. The results suggest that neither internal nor external factors dominate to control the anticipatory response and that the relative contributions vary with stimulus conditions. A model in which neuronal anticipation and fixation signals interact can explain the results.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Timing and velocity randomization similarly affect anticipatory pursuit.

Smooth pursuit eye movements are guided largely by retinal-image motion. To compensate for neural conduction delays, the brain employs a predictive mechanism to generate anticipatory pursuit that precedes target motion (E. Kowler, 1990). A critical question for interpreting neural signals recorded during pursuit concerns how this mechanism is interfaced with sensorimotor processing. It has been shown that the predictor is not simply turned-off during randomization because anticipatory eye velocity remains when target velocity is randomized (E. Kowler & S. McKee, 1987; G. W. Kao & M. J. Morrow, 1994). This study was completed to compare pursuit behavior during randomized motion-onset timing with that occurring during direction or speed randomization. We found that anticipatory eye velocity persisted despite motion-onset randomization, and that anticipation onset time was between that observed in the different constant-timing conditions. This centering strategy was similar to the bias of eye velocity magnitude away from extremes observed when direction or speed was randomized. Such a strategy is comparable to least-squares error minimization, and could be used to facilitate acquisition of a target when it begins to move. Centering was in some observers accounted for by a shift of eye velocity toward that generated in the preceding trial. The results make unlikely a model in which the predictor is disengaged by randomizing stimulus timing, and suggest that predictive signals always interact with those used in sensorimotor processing during smooth pursuit.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Trajectory interpretation by supplementary eye field neurons during ocular baseball.

Good performance in the sport of baseball shows that humans can determine the trajectory of a moving object and act on it under the constraint of a rule. We report here on neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field (SEF) of monkeys performing an eye movement task inspired by baseball. In "ocular baseball," a pursuit eye movement to a target is executed or withheld based on the target's trajectory. We found that a subset of neurons in the SEF interpreted the trajectory according to the task rule. Other neurons specified at a later time the command to pursue the target with the eyes. The results suggest that the SEF can interpret sensory signals about target motion in the context of a rule to guide voluntary eye movement initiation.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Decoding of a motor command vector from distributed activity in superior colliculus.

Several alternative methods for decoding the desired motor command vector from neural networks containing distributed, place-coded information have been suggested. The two most widely discussed candidate mechanisms are vector summation (VS) and a center-of-mass (CM) computation. The latter mechanism has also been called vector averaging. The present paper compares the operation of these two methods in a model of an experimentally well-studied neural structure, the superior colliculus (SC). The SC is one structure that has been shown to be responsible for generating saccadic command vectors in the form of distributed neural activity that is topologically arranged across its surface. It has been suggested that the pattern of eye-movement errors obtained following the placement of a collicular lesion can distinguish between these two mechanisms. As a result of this suggestion, the pattern of saccadic errors produced by lesions in the SC have been widely cited to support the CM hypothesis. In the present paper the placement of a discrete lesion is simulated in a recurrent (dynamic) neural network model of the SC. These dynamic connections in the model SC network produce a systematic shift of the locus of distributed activity away from the site of the lesion. The spatiotemporal shift in the location of SC activity then produces a pattern of saccadic errors that appear to support the CM hypothesis, even though ensemble activity in our model colliculus is decoded by VS. This result demonstrates that, when ensemble activity on the SC motor map is dynamically modulated over space and time by intrinsic collicular circuitry, an explicit CM computation is not needed to reproduce the pattern of physiological results that follow focal SC lesions.

Animals↗