Biomedical subjects

Jeremy A Guggenheim

Publications and source records attributed to Jeremy A Guggenheim.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Variance Polygenic Scores (vPGS) as a Tool for Studying Gene-Environment Interactions Associated With Refractive Error.

PURPOSE: Conventional polygenic scores predict an individual's phenotype based on their genetics. By contrast, variance polygenic scores (vPGS) quantify genetic predisposition to phenotypic variance. We tested the hypothesis that a vPGS for refractive error can identify individuals with increased susceptibility to environmental risk factors for myopia. METHODS: Six vPGS construction strategies were evaluated in UK Biobank participants: three variance heterogeneity genome-wide association study (vGWAS) methods and two reweighting schemes. vPGS performance was assessed using two metrics: (i) "Diff"-difference in phenotypic variance in vPGS decile ten versus one; (ii) Spearman correlation of phenotypic variance versus vPGS decile. The optimal vPGS was used to test for vPGS × time spent reading or vPGS × time spent outdoors interactions in children aged 15 years (ALSPAC cohort; n = 3471). RESULTS: Of the vGWAS methods, conditional quantile regression outperformed SCAMPI and Levene's Test. Of the re-weighting schemes, LDpred2 outperformed pruning and thresholding. In an independent sample of UK Biobank participants (n = 19,470), the top-performing vPGS successfully stratified individuals into groups with increasing variance in refractive error, even after adjusting for a conventional PGS (Diff: 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-3.47; Spearman correlation = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93). However, in ALSPAC participants, there was minimal support for vPGS interactions with time reading (P = 0.80) or time outdoors (P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: A novel vPGS successfully stratified individuals into groups with relatively high or low genetic susceptibility to refractive error variance. However, the vPGS could not identify individuals at enhanced risk from lifestyle risk factors for myopia.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Nonuniform Association of Genetic Risk Scores for Intraocular Pressure.

IMPORTANCE: Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a risk factor for primary open-angle glaucoma, and genetic risk scores hold promise as a tool for screening for ocular hypertension. However, genetic risk scores for IOP have a nonuniform association across the range of IOP, which reduces their accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that nonuniform behavior of genetic risk scores for IOP is associated with a specific type of genetic interaction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, post hoc genetic association studies were performed using linear and quantile regression in a sample of UK Biobank participants. Data were analyzed from January to September 2025. EXPOSURES: Ninety-eight genetic variants associated with IOP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Tests were carried out for 98 genetic variants associated with IOP (P < 5.0 ×10-8) to examine (1) dominant or recessive genetic effects, (2) genotype × genotype interactions, (3) genotype × age interactions, and (4) genotype × sex interactions. RESULTS: A total of 98 235 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [7.9] years; 52 168 female [53.1%]) were included in this analysis. More variants exhibited genotype × age interactions than expected by chance (14 of the 98 variants associated with IOP had at least nominal evidence of an interaction with age; P = 3.76 ×10-4). For 12 of these 14 variants, age increased rather than decreased the magnitude of the IOP vs genotype association. However, integrating age interactions into the genetic risk score construction process did not yield improved accuracy (incremental noninteraction model, R2 = 4.05; 95% CI, 3.82-4.31 and interaction model, R2 = 4.04; 95% CI, 3.80-4.27). There was little support for other types of genetic interaction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the current work, findings show minimal evidence that nonadditive allelic effects, genotype × genotype interactions, and genotype × sex interactions contributed to the nonuniform association of genetic variants with IOP across quantiles of IOP. Although a genetic risk score for IOP was more accurate in older vs younger individuals, efforts to account for genotype × age interactions in genetic risk score construction did not improve accuracy. These findings suggest other factors, such as gene-environment interactions, contribute to the nonuniform relationship of genetic variants with IOP.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genome-wide discovery reveals 30 loci for choroidal thickness and uncovers potential causal links with angle-closure glaucoma.

The choroid is critical for maintaining vision and implicated in several ocular diseases, being the sole source of nutrients and waste removal for the outer retina. Genetic discovery can help elucidate the pathways through which choroidal features influence disease risk. Our meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (n= 78,682 participants) identified 30 genomic regions, including 20 novel loci, associated with choroidal thickness. Findings suggest inflammatory and vascular processes drive choroidal thickness, with overlapping mechanisms shared with refractive error. Genome-wide independently significant SNPs accounted for 18.7% of the genetic variance in choroidal thickness. Mendelian randomisation analyses showed a causal effect of age-related macular degeneration on choroidal thickness, and suggest a bidirectional causal effect between choroidal thickness and primary angle-closure glaucoma. These findings provide insight into the shared genetic architecture and biological pathways linking choroidal thickness and related diseases.

Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging↗