Biomedical subjects

Jennifer L Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to Jennifer L Anderson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Spatial biology reveals altered macrophage states in immunosuppressed non-melanoma skin cancer.

Immunosuppressed patients with non-melanoma skin cancer experience worse clinical outcomes, yet the tumor immune microenvironment associated with systemic immunosuppression remains incompletely defined. Using integrated single-cell, spatial transcriptomic, multiplex immunofluorescence, and spatial epigenomic profiling across immunocompetent and immunosuppressed tumors, we found that overall immune-cell composition was largely preserved despite differences in immune-cell distribution, spatial organization, and T cell clonality. Immunosuppressed tumors demonstrated reduced intratumoral macrophage densities, decreased T cell clonal diversity, altered antigen-presenting cell and T cell spatial interactions, and distinct fibroblast- and macrophage-associated spatial niches. Multi-cohort validation across complementary spatial and single-cell platforms identified consistent alterations in innate-adaptive immune organization in immunosuppressed tumors. Together, these findings define spatial and functional remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment under systemic immunosuppression and provide a framework for future therapeutic investigation in high-risk patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.

PURPOSE: Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants' motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers. METHODS: We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms. RESULTS: We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n = 223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed "important" were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate. CONCLUSIONS: Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.

Genomic testing↗

PubMed2025

Novel approaches to clinical trial design in cancer neuroscience.

The emerging field of cancer neuroscience has revealed profound bidirectional interactions between the nervous system and cancer cells, identifying novel therapeutic vulnerabilities across diverse malignancies. This review examines the unique challenges and strategies for translating these insights into effective therapies. We propose innovative approaches to overcome these barriers through drug repurposing, enhanced biomarker development, and optimized trial designs. Repurposing neuroactive drugs with established safety profiles offers an accelerated path to clinical impact, particularly for targeting glutamatergic, adrenergic, and neurotrophic signaling pathways. Emphasizing mitigation of neurotoxicity and improved patient quality of life will be paramount moving forward. Repurposed agents that show preliminary potential for "dual use" (i.e., simultaneous toxicity mitigation and synergistic anti-tumor effects) are highlighted for special consideration. Master protocols and window-of-opportunity trials provide platforms to rapidly validate mechanisms while addressing patient-centered outcomes. By systematically addressing these foundational elements across disciplines, cancer neuroscience can translate its profound mechanistic insights into meaningful therapeutic advances for patients with treatment-resistant malignancies.

Humans↗