Biomedical subjects

Jennifer J Duchnick

Publications and source records attributed to Jennifer J Duchnick.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Role of executive functioning in verbal and visual memory.

G. Tremont, S. Halpert, D. J. Javorsky, and R. A. Stern (2000) found that individuals with executive dysfunction were more impaired on less structured versus more structured verbal memory tasks. In the present study, the authors investigated the relationship between executive functions and memory in patients with a history of traumatic brain injury by examining the effect of executive functioning on more structured and less structured verbal and visual memory tasks at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Matched subgroups controlled for differences in severity of neuropsychological impairment unrelated to specific executive functions. The G. Tremont et al. (2000) findings were not replicated. Results showed that when acuteness and severity of injury were controlled, executive impairment played no significant role in performance on either more or less structured memory tasks. However, regardless of structure, executive functions played a role in visual memory performance, suggesting that visual memory may be a more fluid ability than verbal memory.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Identifying retrieval problems using the California Verbal Learning Test.

Wilde, Boake, and Sherer (1995) examined the discrepancy between Long Delayed Free Recall (LDFR) and Recognition Discriminability (RD)--the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) index thought to indicate the presence of memory retrieval problems--and found little evidence to recommend its use in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The present investigation re-examined this index from the perspective of a continuum of retrieval deficit severity. CVLT performance was examined in 122 TBI patients, and 2 retrieval deficit indicators of varying severity were evaluated. Memory-impaired control groups were matched with retrieval deficit groups on initial acquisition and demographic characteristics. Individuals with a LDFR/RD discrepancy did not show predicted differences on other CVLT indices of retrieval problems, similar to the findings of Wilde et al. (1995). In contrast, individuals with a consistent discrepancy between free recall and semantic cued recall (Short and Long Delay) had greater improvement with recognition cueing and made fewer intrusive errors than controls. Individuals who benefited from semantic cues (where retrieval of the target word is still required) also benefited from recognition cues (where retrieval demands are minimal). Evidence supported the existence of a continuum of retrieval deficit severity. An LDFR/RD discrepancy without performance improvement from semantic cueing appears to indicate a more severe retrieval deficit, whereas performance improvement from both recognition and semantic cueing indicates less severe retrieval deficits.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Demographic, medical, and psychiatric factors in work and marital status after mild head injury.

OBJECTIVE: To explore factors associated with long-term outcomes of work and marital status in individuals who had experienced a mild head injury (MHI), as well as those who had not. DESIGN: Population-based study using logistical regression analyses to investigate the impact of preinjury characteristics on work and marital status. PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of Vietnam-era Army veterans: 626 who had experienced a MHI an average of 8 years before examination, and 3,896 who had not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, concurrent medical conditions, early life psychiatric problems, loss of consciousness (LOC), and interactions among these variables were used to predict current work and marital status. RESULTS: Multiple variables were associated with work and marital status in the sample with MHI, accounting for approximately 23% and 17% of the variance in these two outcome variables, respectively. In contrast, the same factors accounted for significantly less variance in outcome in the sample without a head injury-13.3% and 9.4% for work and marital status, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a more potent role for and increased vulnerability to the influence of demographic, medical, and psychiatric factors on outcomes after a MHI. That is, MHI itself moderates the influence of preinjury characteristics on work and marital status. In addition, in those who had a MHI, moderator relationships were found between education and LOC for both work and marital status. Similarly, complex moderator relationships among race, region of residence, and LOC were found for both work and marital status outcomes.

Adult↗