Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeffery P Struewing

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffery P Struewing.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Papillary thyroid cancer and polymorphic variants in TSHR- and RET-related genes: a nested case-control study within a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.

Several variants in the TSHR and RET signaling pathways genes have been reported to be related to cancer risk. We hypothesized that polymorphic variants in these genes are associated with the risk of papillary thyroid cancer. A nested case-control study was conducted within the U.S. Radiologic Technologists cohort. Eligible validated papillary thyroid cancer cases (n = 167) and frequency-matched (by sex and birth year) controls (n = 491) donated blood for analysis. There were no statistically significant associations between papillary thyroid cancer and 10 selected polymorphic variants in analyses of men and women combined. A borderline significant increasing risk was found for RET G691S (P(trend) = 0.05) and was especially pronounced among young women. For women under 38 years (the median age at diagnosis), the odds ratios were 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.7) for those heterozygous for the RET G691S polymorphism and 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.8) for those who were homozygous (P(trend) = 0.001). Our data provide limited evidence that TSHR- and RET-related genes are related to papillary thyroid cancer risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: risk perception and screening.

This study aimed to ascertain whether cancer risk perception changed following the offer and subsequent receipt of BRCA1/2 results and to evaluate breast and ovarian screening practices in testers and non-testers. Members of thirteen HBOC families were offered BRCA1/2 testing for a known family mutation. Perceived risk for developing breast cancer, ovarian cancer or for carrying the familial BRCA1/2 mutation, was assessed at baseline and again at 6-9 months following the receipt of test results. Breast and ovarian cancer screening data were obtained at both time-points. A total of 138 women participated and 120 (87%) chose to be tested for a known familial mutation. Twenty-eight women (24%) were identified as carriers and their perceived ovarian cancer risk and their perception of being a mutation carrier increased (P = 0.01 for both). Those testing negatives had a significant decrease in all dimensions of risk perception (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed test results to be strong predictors of follow-up risk perception (P = 0.001), however, they were not predictors of screening practices at follow-up. Testers were more likely to have completed a clinical breast exam following testing than decliners. Mammography was positively associated with baseline adherence, age, and intrusive thoughts. Ovarian cancer worries only predicted pelvic ultrasound screening post-testing. Baseline practices and psychological factors appear to be stronger predictors of health behavior than test results.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Candidate single nucleotide polymorphism selection using publicly available tools: a guide for epidemiologists.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common form of human genetic variation, with millions present in the human genome. Because only 1% might be expected to confer more than modest individual effects in association studies, the selection of predictive candidate variants for complex disease analyses is formidable. Technologic advances in SNP discovery and the ever-changing annotation of the genome have led to massive informational resources that can be difficult to master across disciplines. A simplified guide is needed. Although methods for evaluating nonsynonymous coding SNPs are known, several other publicly available computational tools can be utilized to assess polymorphic variants in noncoding regions. As an example, the authors applied multiple methods to select SNPs in DNA double-strand break repair genes. They chose to evaluate SNPs that occurred among a preexisting set of 57 validated assays and to justify new assay development for 83 potential SNPs in the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit. Of the 140 SNPs, the authors eliminated 119 variants with low or neutral predictions. The existing computational methods they used and the semiquantitative relative ranking strategy they developed can be adapted to a priori SNP selection or post hoc evaluation of variants identified in whole genome scans or within haplotype blocks associated with disease. The authors show a "real world" application of some existing bioinformatics tools for use in large epidemiologic studies and genetic analyses. They also reviewed alternative approaches that provide related information.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses.

The double-strand break DNA repair pathway has been implicated in breast carcinogenesis. We evaluated the association between 19 polymorphisms in seven genes in this pathway (XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA2, ZNF350, BRIP1, XRCC4, LIG4) and breast cancer risk in two population-based studies in USA (3,368 cases and 2,880 controls) and Poland (1,995 cases and 2,296 controls). These data suggested weak associations with breast cancer risk for XRCC3 T241M and IVS7-14A>G (pooled odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.18 (1.04-1.34) and 0.85 (0.73-0.98) for homozygous variant vs wild-type genotypes, respectively), and for an uncommon variant in ZNF350 S472P (1.24 (1.05-1.48)), with no evidence for study heterogeneity. The remaining variants examined had no significant relationships to breast cancer risk. Meta-analyses of studies in Caucasian populations, including ours, provided some support for a weak association for homozygous variants for XRCC3 T241M (1.16 (1.04-1.30); total of 10,979 cases and 10,423 controls) and BRCA2 N372H (1.13 (1.10-1.28); total of 13,032 cases and 13,314 controls), and no support for XRCC2 R188H (1.06 (0.59-1.91); total of 8,394 cases and 8,404 controls). In conclusion, the genetic variants evaluated are unlikely to have a substantial overall association with breast cancer risk; however, weak associations are possible for XRCC3 (T241M and IVS7-14A>G), BRCA2 N372H, and ZNF350 S472P. Evaluation of potential underlying gene-gene interactions or associations in population subgroups will require even larger sample sizes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Localization of breast cancer susceptibility loci by genome-wide SNP linkage disequilibrium mapping.

We studied the feasibility of a novel approach to localize breast cancer susceptibility genes, using a low-density genome-wide panel of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and taking advantage of large regions of linkage disequilibrium (LD) flanking Jewish disease genes in high-risk cases. With Affymetrix GeneChip arrays, we genotyped 8,576 polymorphisms in three sets of Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer cases: a "validation" set of 27 breast cancer cases, all of whom carried the BRCA2*6174delT founder mutation; a "field" set of 19 breast cancer cases from male breast cancer kindreds, which simulated conditions for finding new genes; and a "test" set of 57 probands from breast cancer kindreds (4 or more cases/kindred), in which mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 had been excluded. To identify associations, we compared the frequency of genotypes and haplotypes in cases vs. controls by the Fisher's exact test and a maximum likelihood ratio test. In the "validation" set, we demonstrated the presence of a region of linkage disequilibrium on BRCA2*6174delT chromosomes that spanned over 5 million bases. In the "field" set, we showed that this large region of linkage disequilibrium flanking BRCA2 was detectable despite the presence of heterogeneity in the sample set. Finally, in the "test" set, at least three regions of interest emerged that could contain novel breast cancer genes, one of which had been identified previously by linkage analysis. While these results demonstrate the feasibility of genome-wide association strategies, further application of this approach will critically depend on optimizing the density and distribution of SNPs and the size and type of study design.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The ATM missense mutation p.Ser49Cys (c.146C>G) and the risk of breast cancer.

Homozygous mutation in the ATM gene causes ataxia telangiectasia and heterozygous mutation carriers may be at increased risk of breast cancer. We studied a total of 22 ATM variants; 18 variants were analyzed in one of two large population-based studies from the U.S. and Poland, and four variants were analyzed in all 2,856 breast cancer cases and 3,344 controls from the two studies. The missense mutation Ser49Cys (c.146C>G, p.S49C), carried by approximately 2% of subjects, was more common in cases than controls in both study populations, combined odds ratio (OR) 1.69 (95% CI, 1.19-2.40; P=0.004). Another missense mutation at approximately 2% frequency, Phe858Leu (c.2572T>C, p.F858L), was associated with a significant increased risk in the U.S. study but not in Poland, and had a combined OR of 1.44 (95% CI, 0.98-2.11; P=0.06). These analyses provide the most convincing evidence thus far that missense mutations in ATM, particularly p.S49C, may be breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Because of their low frequency, even larger sample sizes are required to more firmly establish these associations.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The AIB1 polyglutamine repeat does not modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

This is by far the largest study of its kind to date, and further suggests that AIB1 does not play a substantial role in modifying the phenotype of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The AIB1 gene encodes the AIB1/SRC-3 steroid hormone receptor coactivator, and amplification of the gene and/or protein occurs in breast and ovarian tumors. A CAG/CAA repeat length polymorphism encodes a stretch of 17 to 29 glutamines in the HR-interacting carboxyl-terminal region of the protein which is somatically unstable in tumor tissues and cell lines. There is conflicting evidence regarding the role of this polymorphism as a modifier of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. To further evaluate the evidence for an association between AIB1 glutamine repeat length and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we have genotyped this polymorphism in 1,090 BRCA1 and 661 BRCA2 mutation carriers from Australia, Europe, and North America. There was no evidence for an increased risk associated with AIB1 glutamine repeat length. Given the large sample size, with more than adequate power to detect previously reported effects, we conclude that the AIB1 glutamine repeat does not substantially modify risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Acetyltransferases↗
PubMed2005

Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer penetrance estimates in BRCA1 mutation carriers have varied from 40% to 85%; this heterogeneity has been attributed to variations in risk among different study populations. No study has taken oophorectomy status into account in estimating penetrance. Because prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer risk by approximately 50%, we hypothesized that population differences in oophorectomy prevalence might significantly influence breast cancer penetrance estimates. METHODS: Females from multiple-case breast/ovarian cancer families that segregate deleterious BRCA1 mutations were observed prospectively for breast cancer incidence and oophorectomy. RESULTS: Within this cohort, 33 cases of breast cancer developed in 98 women with deleterious BRCA1 mutations during follow-up, yielding an estimated cumulative lifetime breast cancer risk of 80%. This estimate increased to 94% when the study participants were censored at the time of oophorectomy. Six of the 33 mutation-positive women who underwent oophorectomy during follow-up developed breast cancer, compared with 27 of 65 mutation carriers with intact ovaries (hazard ratio = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97). Estimates of absolute breast cancer risk demonstrated that the protective effect of oophorectomy was strongest among women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery. When surgical status was ignored, the strong protective effect of oophorectomy, coupled with the high prevalence of the procedure in these families, led to a significantly lower estimate of the breast cancer penetrance in BRCA1 mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: Differing rates of oophorectomy likely represent an underappreciated basis for a portion of the heterogeneity in estimated breast cancer penetrance described in BRCA mutation carriers, particularly mutation carriers from extensively affected, multiple-case families.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

DNA damage among thyroid cancer and multiple cancer cases, controls, and long-lived individuals.

Variation in the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage contributes to human cancer risk. To assess capacity to modulate endogenous DNA damage among radiologic technologists who had been diagnosed with breast cancer and another malignancy (breast-other, n=42), early-onset breast cancer (early-onset, age or=75% versus below the median, age-adjusted) was most consistently associated with the highest odds ratios in the breast-other, early-onset, and thyroid cancer groups (with risk increased 10-, 5- or 19-fold, respectively, with wide confidence intervals) and decreased risk among the hyper-normal group. For the other three comet measures, risk of breast-other was elevated approximately three-fold. Risk of early-onset breast cancer was mixed and risk of thyroid cancer ranged from null to a two-fold increase. The hyper-normal group showed decreased odds ratios for tail DNA and OTM, but not CDM. DNA damage, as estimated by all comet measures, was relatively unaffected by survival time, reproductive factors, and prior radiation treatment. We detected a continuum of endogenous DNA damage that was highest among cancer cases, less in controls, and suggestively lowest in hyper-normal individuals. Measuring this DNA damage phenotype may contribute to the identification of susceptible sub-groups. Our observations require replication in a prospective study with a large number of pre-diagnostic samples.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships.

Members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families often express concern during genetic counseling about the impact of BRCA1/2 testing on close relatives. Yet whether there are likely to be adverse effects of either the decision to undergo genetic testing or the results of testing on family relationships is unknown. One purpose of this study was to assess the impact on close family relationships. Within a randomized trial of breast cancer genetic counseling methods, members of 13 HBOC families were offered BRCA1/2 testing for a known family mutation. The Family Relationship Index (FRI) of the Family Environment Scale (FES) was used to measure perceived family cohesion, conflict, and expressiveness at baseline and again 6-9 months following the receipt of test results, or at the equivalent time for those who declined testing. Participants (n = 212) completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Comparisons were made between testers and non-testers as well as between those who tested positive and negative for the family mutation. One hundred eighty-one participants elected to undergo genetic testing (85%) and 47 (26%) were identified to have a mutation. After adjusting for baseline family relationship scores, counseling intervention, gender and marital status, non-testers reported a greater increase in expressiveness (P = 0.006) and cohesion (P = 0.04) than testers. Individuals who tested positive reported a decrease in expressiveness (P = 0.07), although as a trend. Regardless of test decision or test result, those who were randomized to a client-centered counseling intervention reported a decrease in conflict (P = 0.006). Overall, study results suggest that undergoing genetic testing and learning ones BRCA1/2 status may affect family relationships. Those individuals who declined testing reported feeling closer to family members and more encouraged to express emotions to other family members demonstrating potential benefit from the offer of testing. Since those who tested positive reported feeling less encouraged to express their emotions within the family, we recommend helping clients to identify others with whom they feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and feelings about their positive gene status and increased cancer risk.

BRCA1 Protein↗
PubMed2004

Heterogeneity of risk for melanoma and pancreatic and digestive malignancies: a melanoma case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Data addressing the interfamilial heterogeneity of melanoma are limited. In the current study, the authors assessed melanoma risk according to family history of melanoma and other melanoma-associated malignancies and evaluated the familial heterogeneity of melanomas, pancreatic malignancies, and gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: The authors obtained patient histories of malignancy in first-degree relatives as part of a clinic-based case-control study. The case group included 737 newly diagnosed patients with invasive melanoma, and the control group included 1021 outpatients from clinics at the same medical centers. To assess heterogeneity of risk among families affected by melanoma, a nonparametric method was used to detect extrabinomial variation. In addition, selected patients with melanoma (n=133) were tested for germline mutations in CDKN2A. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio associated with a family history of melanoma was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.7). Family histories of pancreatic, gastrointestinal, brain, breast, or lymphoproliferative disease did not increase the risk of melanoma significantly. Among case families, significant evidence of familial heterogeneity was found for melanomas, but not for pancreatic or gastrointestinal malignancies. Two mutations in CDKN2A previously associated with melanoma risk were identified among the 133 patients tested in the case group; mutation detection did not differ between families with low and high heterogeneity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Familial heterogeneity testing in the study population did not improve the selection of high-risk families for genetic study. Even in a large case-control study, few families that had multiple members with melanoma were identified, and family members with pancreatic malignancies were rare.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention.

It remains uncertain whether members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families experience psychological distress with genetic testing and whether pre-test counseling can have a moderating effect on client well-being. One purpose of this study was to assess change in psychological well-being from baseline to 6-9 months follow-up and the effect of a problem-solving training (PST) intervention on psychological well-being. Two hundred and twelve members of 13 HBOC families were offered BRCA1/2 testing for a previously identified family mutation. Participants received education and were randomized to one of two counseling interventions; PST or client-centered counseling. Psychological well-being was assessed at baseline and again at 6-9 months following the receipt of test results, or at the equivalent time for those participants who chose not to undergo testing. Well-being was assessed using measures of depressive symptoms (CESD), intrusive thoughts (IES), cancer worries, and self-esteem. Comparisons were made between those who chose testing and those who did not as well as between those who received positive and negative test results. One hundred eighty one participants elected to undergo genetic testing (85%) and 47 of these (26%) were identified as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast and ovarian cancer worries decreased significantly (p = 0.007 and 0.008, respectively) in those who tested negative while there was no appreciable change in psychological well-being from baseline to follow-up in either those who tested positive or in non-testers. Among all participants, particularly testers, those randomized to PST had a greater reduction in depressive symptoms than those randomized to client-centered counseling (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively). Regardless of the decision to test, individuals with a personal history of cancer (n = 22) were more likely to have an increase in breast cancer worries compared to those who had never been diagnosed with cancer (p < 0.001). Results suggest that a problem-solving counseling intervention may help to enhance psychological well-being following testing and that a personal history of cancer may increase psychological distress associated with genetic testing.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Kin-cohort estimates for familial breast cancer risk in relation to variants in DNA base excision repair, BRCA1 interacting and growth factor genes.

BACKGROUND: Subtle functional deficiencies in highly conserved DNA repair or growth regulatory processes resulting from polymorphic variation may increase genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes can impact protein function leading to genomic instability facilitated by growth stimulation and increased cancer risk. Thus, 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in eight genes involved in base excision repair (XRCC1, APEX, POLD1), BRCA1 protein interaction (BRIP1, ZNF350, BRCA2), and growth regulation (TGFss1, IGFBP3) were evaluated. METHODS: Genomic DNA samples were used in Taqman 5'-nuclease assays for most SNPs. Breast cancer risk to ages 50 and 70 were estimated using the kin-cohort method in which genotypes of relatives are inferred based on the known genotype of the index subject and Mendelian inheritance patterns. Family cancer history data was collected from a series of genotyped breast cancer cases (N = 748) identified within a cohort of female US radiologic technologists. Among 2,430 female first-degree relatives of cases, 190 breast cancers were reported. RESULTS: Genotypes associated with increased risk were: XRCC1 R194W (WW and RW vs. RR, cumulative risk up to age 70, risk ratio (RR) = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-3.8); XRCC1 R399Q (QQ vs. RR, cumulative risk up to age 70, RR = 1.9; 1.1-3.9); and BRIP1 (or BACH1) P919S (SS vs. PP, cumulative risk up to age 50, RR = 6.9; 1.6-29.3). The risk for those heterozygous for BRCA2 N372H and APEX D148E were significantly lower than risks for homozygotes of either allele, and these were the only two results that remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. No associations with breast cancer were observed for: APEX Q51H; XRCC1 R280H; IGFPB3 -202A>C; TGFss1 L10P, P25R, and T263I; BRCA2 N289H and T1915M; BRIP1 -64A>C; and ZNF350 (or ZBRK1) 1845C>T, L66P, R501S, and S472P. CONCLUSION: Some variants in genes within the base-excision repair pathway (XRCC1) and BRCA1 interacting proteins (BRIP1) may play a role as low penetrance breast cancer risk alleles. Previous association studies of breast cancer and BRCA2 N372H and functional observations for APEX D148E ran counter to our findings of decreased risks. Due to the many comparisons, cautious interpretation and replication of these relationships are warranted.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

BRCA1 and sex ratio.

Two recent papers suggest distorted sex and transmission ratios associated with BRCA1 mutations. If real, these would provide novel insights into the normal biological function of this gene and have implications for genetic epidemiologic methods used to estimate penetrance. We addressed these observations in two settings: offspring of 283 mutation carriers and 471 mutation negative subjects from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer (NCI families); and relatives of 115 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from the Washington Ashkenazi Study (WAS). The male:female ratio was below one in both BRCA1 (0.85, 95% CI 0.7-1.1 in NCI families; 0.90, 95% CI 0.6-1.4 in WAS) and BRCA2 families (0.77, 95% CI 0.5-1.3 and 0.80, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, in the NCI and WAS study groups, respectively). None of the sex ratios deviated significantly from one, and there was no significant difference between BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. The reduced sex ratio was due largely to the offspring of males, a distortion that is probably an artifact of ascertainment biases. Among adult daughters without breast or ovarian cancer born to mutation carriers, as expected, fewer than 50% were mutation carriers (39% in BRCA1 families and 44% in BRCA2 families). It is difficult, due to ascertainment biases, to draw firm conclusions regarding sex ratios in studies of a sex-limited phenotype. Nonetheless, these observations do not support the idea that BRCA1 mutation carriers have a lower ratio of male offspring than BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Genomic approaches to identifying breast cancer susceptibility factors.

The majority of the genetic variants underlying susceptibility to breast cancer are yet to be discovered. Genome-wide linkage analyses, utilizing anonymous genetic markers, have been successful at identifying two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which account for a sizeable fraction of the clearly inherited forms of breast cancer occurring in autosomal dominant Mendellian patterns. Mutations in these genes, however, account for less than (1/4) of the total genetic component of breast cancer susceptibility and the remaining component is likely to be polygenic in nature - the interaction of mutations in multiple genes, each with a weak effect, in combination with environmental influences. The identification of these polygenes will likely require the study of large numbers of unrelated subjects with and without breast cancer in case-control association studies. Until the time when complete genome sequence information is feasible for all study subjects, interim strategies involving a subset of all common genetic variation (primarily single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) are being planned. Assuming the common disease-common variant theory of complex disease susceptibility, studying a very dense set of genetic markers is likely to identify breast cancer susceptibility genes by virtue of including either the biologically relevant variant, or one closely correlated with it due to linkage disequilibrium.

Journal Article↗