Biomedical subjects

Jean-Marie Bamvita

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Marie Bamvita.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Paying the price of excluding patients from a trauma registry.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different trauma registry exclusion criteria on the assessment of trauma populations and outcome. METHODS: All patients admitted to a Canadian regional trauma center from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 2002 with a diagnosis of trauma (ICD-9 codes 800 to 959) were reviewed. TOTAL included everyone. REGISTRY included only patients meeting any of four criteria: death during hospital stay, transfer received from another hospital, admission to the intensive care unit, or hospital stay of 3 days or more. NOHIP excluded patients with isolated hip fracture. REG/NOHIP combined both. ISS12 and ISS15 excluded patients with ISS <12 and 15, respectively. RESULTS: There were 6,839 trauma patients. The percentage of excluded patients by group was: REGISTRY, 21.2%; NOHIP, 14.7%; REG/NOHIP, 34.9%; ISS12, 75%; and ISS15, 80.3%. Median length of stay was 7 days. Exclusions represented a total number of hospitalization days varying from 1.9% to 65.5% of TOTAL. Mortality was 6.9% for TOTAL, 8.6% for REGISTRY (p < 0.001), 5.7% for NOHIP (p = 0.009), 7.5% for REG/NOHIP (p=NS), 16.1% for ISS12 (p < 0.001), and 20.4% for ISS15 (p < 0.001). In groups with exclusions, transfer to long-term care varied from 0.14% to 23.5% in the excluded patients. For rehabilitation, these percentages varied from 0.14% to 17.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Registry exclusion criteria significantly alter the apparent severity of injury and resource utilization. The use of divergent exclusion criteria in the analysis of trauma registry data may be misleading.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

A simple fall in the elderly: not so simple.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the burden of falls in the elderly in a Canadian tertiary trauma center. METHODS: Patients admitted to Charles-LeMoyne Hospital with a low velocity fall (LVF) from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 2000 were individually reviewed. Elderly was defined as age 65 years and older. A region was considered to be injured if Abbreviated Injury Scale was greater than or equal to 2. RESULTS: There were 2,333 patients with LVF, 41.4% of all blunt trauma admissions. Median Injury Severity Score was 9 for elderly compared with 5 for young (p < 0.001). Injuries were significantly more frequent to head, face, thorax, and lower limbs in the elderly. Mortality (13.4% versus 0.9%; p < 0.001), length of stay (median = 15 versus 3 days; p < 0.001) and long-term care facility reference (19.3% versus 1.1%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: LVF is a frequent cause of admission for trauma in the elderly. Despite the apparent benign nature of the mechanism, LVF is associated with more severe injuries and worse outcome.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗

PubMed2006

Is the delay to surgery for isolated hip fracture predictive of outcome in efficient systems?

BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes for patients with isolated hip fracture have been documented when preoperative delay is longer than 48 hours. An efficient system will have the capacity to repair all hip fractures within 48 hours. We hypothesized that in an efficient system, there would be a medical justification for a delay greater than 48 hours. The purpose of this study was to identify the causes and outcome of delay for hip surgery in an efficient system. METHODS: All patients with isolated hip fracture admitted to a regional trauma center from April 1993 to March 2003 were reviewed. Demographics, presence of comorbidity, preoperative delay, complications, and mortality were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The cohort included 977 patients. Overall mortality was 12.2%. Surgery was performed within 24 hours in 53% of cases and within 48 hours in 87% of cases. The presence of comorbidity partly explained longer (>48 hours) surgical delays. Multivariate analysis revealed that age greater than 65, male sex, and the presence of pulmonary and cardiac comorbid conditions or an active cancer but not surgical delay were associated with mortality and complications. However, surgical delay was associated with longer postsurgical hospital stay, independently of the presence of comorbidity or increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative delay does not entail adverse outcomes when the surgery is delayed to allow for treatment of comorbid medical conditions. Preoperative delay is associated with a longer hospital stay. The presence of comorbidity only partly explains preoperative delay and adverse outcomes. A prospective study coding for the severity of comorbid conditions and the justification of the preoperative delay will be required to fully elucidate the link between delay and outcome.

Adult↗