Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jay R Harris.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To describe the initial experience at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as adjuvant therapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of patients treated with IMRT after EPP and adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. IMRT was given to a dose of 54 Gy to the clinical target volume in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Treatment was delivered with a dynamic multileaf collimator using a sliding window technique. Eleven of 13 patients received heated intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy (225 mg/m(2)). Two patients received neoadjuvant intravenous cisplatin/pemetrexed, and 10 patients received adjuvant cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy after EPP but before radiation therapy. All patients received at least 2 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. The contralateral lung was limited to a V20 (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy or more) of 20% and a mean lung dose (MLD) of 15 Gy. All patients underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for staging, and any FDG-avid areas in the hemithorax were given a simultaneous boost of radiotherapy to 60 Gy. Statistical comparisons were done using two-sided t test. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated with IMRT from December 2004 to September 2005. Six patients developed fatal pneumonitis after treatment. The median time from completion of IMRT to the onset of radiation pneumonitis was 30 days (range 5-57 days). Thirty percent of patients (4 of 13) developed acute Grade 3 nausea and vomiting. One patient developed acute Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The median V20, MLD, and V5 (volume of lung receiving 5 Gy or more) for the patients who developed pneumonitis was 17.6% (range, 15.3-22.3%), 15.2 Gy (range, 13.3-17 Gy), and 98.6% (range, 81-100%), respectively, as compared with 10.9% (range, 5.5-24.7%) (p = 0.08), 12.9 Gy (range, 8.7-16.9 Gy) (p = 0.07), and 90% (range, 66-98.3%) (p = 0.20), respectively, for the patients who did not develop pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated RT treatment for mesothelioma after EPP and adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a high rate of fatal pneumonitis when standard dose parameters were used. We therefore recommend caution in the utilization of this technique. Our data suggest that with IMRT, metrics such as V5 and MLD should be considered in addition to V20 to determine tolerance levels in future patients.
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in reducing local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in unselected patients with early stage invasive breast cancer has been demonstrated in multiple randomized trials. Whether a subset of women can achieve local control without RT is unknown. In 1986, we initiated a prospective one-arm trial of BCS alone for highly selected breast-cancer patients. This report updates those results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-seven (of 90 planned) patients enrolled from 1986 until closure in 1992, when a predefined stopping boundary was crossed. Patients were required to have a unicentric, T1, pathologic node-negative invasive ductal, mucinous, or tubular carcinoma without an extensive intraductal component or lymphatic-vessel invasion. Surgery included local excision with margins of at least 1 cm or a negative re-excision. No RT or systemic therapy was given. RESULTS: Results are available on 81 patients (median follow-up, 86 months). Nineteen patients (23%) had local recurrence (LR) as a first site of failure (average annual LR: 3.5 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). Other sites of first failure included 1 ipsilateral axilla, 2 contralateral breast cancers, and 4 distant metastases. Six patients developed other (nonbreast) malignancies. Nine patients have died, 4 of metastatic breast cancer and 5 of unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this highly selected cohort, a substantial risk of local recurrence occurred after BCS alone with margins of 1.0 cm or more. These results suggest that with the possible exception of elderly women with comorbid conditions, radiation therapy after BCS remains standard treatment.
PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that wide excision alone with margins > or = 1 cm may be adequate treatment for small, grade 1 or 2 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To test this hypothesis, we conducted a prospective, single-arm trial. METHODS: Entry criteria included DCIS of predominant grade 1 or 2 with a mammographic extent of < or = 2.5 cm treated with wide excision with final margins of > or = 1 cm or a re-excision without residual DCIS. Tamoxifen was not permitted. The accrual goal was 200 patients. RESULTS: In July 2002, the study closed to accrual at 158 patients because the number of local recurrences met the predetermined stopping rules. The median age was 51 and the median follow-up time was 40 months. Thirteen patients developed local recurrence as the first site of treatment failure 7 to 63 months after study entry. The rate of ipsilateral local recurrence as first site of treatment failure was 2.4% per patient-year, corresponding to a 5-year rate of 12%. Nine patients (69%) experienced recurrence of DCIS and four (31%) experienced recurrence with invasive disease. Twelve recurrences were detected mammographically and one was palpable. Ten were in the same quadrant as the initial DCIS and three were elsewhere within the ipsilateral breast. No patient had positive axillary nodes at recurrence or subsequent metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Despite margins of > or = 1 cm, the local recurrence rate is substantial when patients with small, grade 1 or 2 DCIS are treated with wide excision alone. This risk should be considered in assessing the possible use of radiation therapy with or without tamoxifen in these patients.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase the risk for breast cancer. Mutation carriers selecting breast-conservation therapy (BCT) for treatment of operable breast cancer experience a higher rate of new primary breast cancers. We sought to determine the frequency of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women who underwent BCT. Genetic testing results were compared with the prior probability of mutations in either gene. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients age 39 or younger entered the study. Genetic testing was performed for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and the BRCAPRO model determined the probability of carrying a mutation. RESULTS: Eight mutations were discovered (prevalence, 9.0%). Twenty (22%) uncharacterized sequence variants were found. The prior probability of carrying a mutation was 14%. Mutation carriers had a higher prior probability (.49) compared with women with uncharacterized variants (.09) or with normal genes (.11). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are common (9%) among unselected young breast cancer patients undergoing BCT.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of concurrent radiation therapy and paclitaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, after adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: After definitive breast surgery and AC chemotherapy, 40 patients with operable Stage II or III breast cancer received protocol-based treatment with concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy. Paclitaxel was evaluated on 2 schedules, with treatment given either weeklyx12 weeks (60 mg/m2), or every 3 weeksx4 cycles (135-175 mg/m2). Radiation fields and schedules were determined by the patient's surgery and pathology. The tolerability of concurrent therapy was evaluated in cohorts of 8 patients as a phase I study. RESULTS: Weekly paclitaxel treatment at 60 mg/m2 per week with concurrent radiation led to dose-limiting toxicity in 4 of 16 patients (25%), including 3 who developed pneumonitis (either Grade 2 [1 patient] or Grade 3 [2 patients]) requiring steroids. Efforts to eliminate this toxicity in combination with weekly paclitaxel through treatment scheduling and CT-based radiotherapy simulation were not successful. By contrast, dose-limiting toxicity was not encountered among patients receiving concurrent radiation with paclitaxel given every 3 weeks at 135-175 mg/m2. However, Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis not requiring steroid therapy was seen in 2 of 24 patients (8%) treated in such a fashion. Excessive radiation dermatitis was not observed with either paclitaxel schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent treatment with weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy is not feasible after adjuvant AC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Concurrent treatment using a less frequent paclitaxel dosing schedule may be possible, but caution is warranted in light of the apparent possibility of pulmonary injury.
This review will address: (1) 'what are the current indications for radiation therapy (RT), following both mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery?' and (2) 'if RT is indicated, what are the appropriate volumes or 'targets' to be treated?' Given the complexity of these questions, this review will focus on selected topics considered of greatest current interest. In addition, this review will primarily focus on results obtained from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Finally, we acknowledge an American point of view in our discussion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The optimal integration of chemotherapy with radiation (RT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer remains uncertain. We present the long-term results of a prospective randomized trial to address this question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned after conservative breast surgery to receive 12 weeks of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and prednisone (CAMFP) before RT (CT-first) or after RT (RT-first). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 135 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the CT-first and RT-first arms in time to any event, distant metastasis, or death. Sites of first failure were also not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Among breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery, there is no advantage to giving RT before adjuvant chemotherapy. However, this study does not have enough statistical power to rule out a clinically important survival benefit for either sequence.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To determine the long-term prognosis of patients who develop a local recurrence (LR) after conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage invasive breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1970 and 1987, 2102 patients with clinical Stage I-II breast cancer were treated with CS+RT. LR was defined as any recurrence within the ipsilateral breast with or without simultaneous regional nodal or distant metastasis. Patients were at risk for a LR until the first of distant metastases, second nonbreast malignancy, or death (DF/S/D). The final study population comprised 341 patients with LR. The median time to LR was 72 months. The median follow-up time after LR was 85 months. A proportional hazards model of time from LR to DF/S/D was done to investigate the influence of factors at initial diagnosis and at LR on subsequent outcome. RESULTS: The actuarial freedom from DF/S/D 5 years after LR was 65% and the survival was 81%. Variables significantly associated with time to DF/S/D were: LR histology (invasive vs. ductal carcinoma in situ, hazard ratio [HR] = 4.1, p < 0.0001); local therapy for LR (none vs. mastectomy or unknown, HR = 3.2, p < 0.0001; and CS +/- RT vs. mastectomy or unknown, HR = 2.0, p = 0.02); time to LR (< or =2 years vs. >5 years, HR = 2.6, p < 0.0001; and 2-5 years vs. >5 years, HR = 1.8, p = 0.006); and age at initial diagnosis (> or =60 vs. <60, HR = 1.6, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with LR after CS+RT have prolonged distant disease-free survival, particularly those able to be treated with mastectomy. Patients with a noninvasive LR, longer interval to LR, or age <60 had a longer time to distant failure, second malignancy, or death than other patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the site of first failure of patients with early-stage tubular, mucinous, and medullary breast carcinoma after breast-conserving therapy and compare their results with those of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty clinical Stage I and II patients with mucinous carcinoma, 27 with medullary carcinoma, 28 with tubular carcinoma, and 1055 with IDC were identified. The minimal potential follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p = 0.15) was seen in the site of first failure between the four histologic types within the first 10 years after treatment. When the IDC tumors were omitted from the comparison, the failure patterns of the remaining three histologic types were not significantly different (p = 0.31). In a polychotomous logistic model, histologic type was not significantly associated with the site of first failure (all p >0.17). Local failure was significantly associated with age <50 years (p = 0.04), positive surgical margins (p = 0.007), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.04), and tumors with an extensive intraductal component (p <0.001). Regional/distant/opposite breast failure was significantly associated with clinical Stage T2 tumors (p <0.001), four or more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.004), and lymphovascular invasion-positive tumors (p <0.001). Second malignancy or death was significantly associated with age at diagnosis >60 years (p <0.001) and lymphovascular invasion-positive tumors (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was noted in the site of first failure between patients with medullary, mucinous, or tubular carcinoma and patients with IDC. Although not statistically significant, we did note a trend toward a lower long-term rate of disease-free survival in patients with IDC.
BACKGROUND: Concurrent administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has the potential advantage of delaying neither treatment and providing radiation sensitization. However, the optimal approach to concurrent treatment in women with early-stage breast carcinoma remains undefined. We present updated results of a prospective protocol of concurrent cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) and reduced-dose radiotherapy, focusing on tumor control and patient tolerance. METHODS: One hundred twelve women with AJCC Stage I or Stage II breast carcinoma with 0-3 positive axillary lymph nodes were enrolled in a prospective single-arm study of concurrent CMF and reduced-dose radiotherapy (39.6 gray [Gy] to the whole breast, 16-Gy boost). A high proportion of women had risk factors associated with an increased risk of local disease recurrence, including age <40 (32%), close or positive margins (37%), or lymphatic/vascular invasion (51%). The median follow-up period was 94 months. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 94%. By 60 months, 5 patients (4%) experienced local disease recurrence and 19 patients (17%) experienced distant metastasis. There were no isolated regional lymph node recurrences. Local disease recurrence occurred in 1 of 25 patients (4%), 1 of 16 patients (6%), and 3 of 70 patients (4%) with positive, close (<1 mm), and negative margins, respectively. One patient developed acute myelogenous leukemia. An additional patient developed Grade 2 pneumonitis. Cosmetic results were not recorded uniformly for all patients and therefore could not be reliably analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent CMF and reduced-dose radiotherapy resulted in a low level of late toxicity and excellent local tumor control, despite the large proportion of patients with substantial risk factors for local disease recurrence. Future studies of concurrent regimens, particularly in patients at high risk of local disease recurrence, are warranted.
PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy are at risk of developing second nonbreast malignancies (SNBMs). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of all SNBMs and SNBMs by specific location among long-term survivors and to compare the risk of these events to the age-specific incidence of malignancies as first cancers in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results Program (SEER) population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed the likelihood of SNBM development for 1884 patients with clinical Stage I or II breast cancer treated with gross excision and > or = 60 Gy (median 63) to the breast between 1970 and 1987. Fifty-seven percent received supraclavicular/axillary radiation (median dose 45 Gy, range 20-60) and 28% received systemic therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 52 years. The median clinical tumor size was 2 cm. Patients were considered at risk of an SNBM until the development of the first of distant metastases or contralateral breast cancer or death or, if alive and disease-free, until the last follow-up visit. The expected numbers of cancers were obtained from the SEER database, using the age-specific incidence for white women within 5-year age groups and 5-year calendar intervals. The median time at risk for an SNBM was 10.9 years (range 0.2-27.9). RESULTS: By 8 years of follow-up, 432 patients (23%) had developed distant metastases, 295 patients (16%) a local/regional recurrence, and 159 (8%) a contralateral primary. Of the 1884 patients in our cohort, 147 (8%) developed an SNBM compared with the 127.7 expected from SEER. This corresponds to an absolute excess of 1% of the study population and a relative increase of 15% greater than that expected from SEER (p = 0.05). Within the first 5 years, the observed and expected rates of SNBMs were identical (47 vs. 46.9). After 5 years, 24% more SNBMs were observed than expected (100 vs. 80.8, p = 0.02). Among patients <50 years old at breast cancer diagnosis, 43% more observed SNBMs occurred than expected (40 vs. 28, p = 0.02). For patients > or = 50 years, 7% more SNBMs were observed than expected (107 vs. 99.7, p = 0.25). Lung SNBMs were observed in 33 women, 52% more than the 21.67 predicted by SEER (p = 0.01). Most of the lung SNBMs occurred >5 years after treatment (n = 23) and in women who were >50 years at the time of their breast cancer diagnosis (n = 27). The observed incidence of ovarian cancer was significantly greater than expected among patients <50 years (7 vs. 1.96, p = 0.004) but was not different than expected for patients > or = 50 years (5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.61). Among the 7 sarcomas, 3 developed in the radiation field. CONCLUSIONS: SNBMs occur in a substantial minority (8%) of patients treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. However, the absolute excess risk compared with the general population is very small (1%). This excess risk is only evident after 5 years. In particular, a slightly increased incidence of lung SNBMs and a somewhat larger increase in ovarian cancer among younger patients was found. Our data suggest that preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of certain cancers (e.g., smoking cessation and prophylactic oophorectomy) and/or continued monitoring for SNBMs to increase the likelihood of early detection and treatment may be prudent in this population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Late cardiac morbidity and mortality among left breast cancer survivors treated with radiation therapy is related to cardiac volume included in the radiation portals. To determine if respiratory maneuvers can help decrease cardiac volume included in the radiation portals for left-sided breast cancer, 17 women with breast cancer, who had undergone left breast radiation therapy, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cardiac volume within the radiation portals was assessed from a transverse stack of eight, 10-mm thick, contiguous slices, covering the entire heart and obtained during breathholding at (1) endtidal volume (ETid) and (2) deep inspiration. Fourteen subjects (93% of those who completed the study) had inclusion of at least a portion of their heart within the radiation portals at ETid (median: 25.9 cm3, range 4.2-119.1 cm3). In all subjects, inspiratory breathholding decreased irradiated cardiac volume [median change: -18.1 cm3 (-49%), p < or = 0.001 vs. ETid]. In 21% of patients, the entire heart could be displaced outside the radiation field with deep inspiration. Age was not correlated with change or percentage change in cardiac volume with respiratory maneuvers. We conclude that in breast cancer patients, deep inspiratory maneuvers significantly decrease irradiated cardiac volume included in the left breast radiation field. Such an approach during delivery of radiation therapy allows preservation of radiation dosage to the breast, while reducing cardiac involvement and possible associated cardiovascular toxicity.