Biomedical subjects

Jay L Goldstein

Publications and source records attributed to Jay L Goldstein.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The rate of NSAID-induced endoscopic ulcers increases linearly but not exponentially with age: a pooled analysis of 12 randomised trials.

The risk of major ulcer complications on treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is known to increase exponentially with age. However, in a pooled analysis of 12 trial arms, the incidence of endoscopic ulcers on treatment with NSAID was found to increase with age in a roughly linear fashion. Thus, it is concluded that increasing age is associated with both more frequent and more serious NSAID gastropathy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Celecoxib versus naproxen and diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients: SUCCESS-I Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) safety of celecoxib, compared with nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), among patients with osteoarthritis. METHODS: A total of 13274 osteoarthritis patients from 39 countries were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (BID), celecoxib 200 mg BID, or nonselective NSAID therapy (diclofenac 50 mg BID or naproxen 500 mg BID) for 12 weeks. Standard validated measures were used to assess osteoarthritis efficacy. Serious UGI events were evaluated by 2 blinded, independent, gastrointestinal events committees. RESULTS: Results from all primary efficacy assessments showed that both dosages of celecoxib were as effective as NSAIDs in treating osteoarthritis. Significantly more ulcer complications occurred within the nonselective NSAID group (0.8/100 patient-years) compared with the celecoxib group (0.1/100 patient-years) (odds ratio = 7.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 33.80; P =.008). There were fewer ulcer complications in the celecoxib group compared with the NSAID group, both in patients taking concomitant aspirin and those not taking aspirin, but the difference reached statistical significance only in the latter comparison. The number of cardiovascular thromboembolic events was low and not statistically different between the groups (eg, myocardial infarction rates: celecoxib 10 events [0.55/100 patient-years] vs NSAIDs 1 event [0.11/100 patient-years], (P =.11), but the study was not powered to detect such differences. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of osteoarthritis, celecoxib is as effective as the nonspecific NSAIDs naproxen and diclofenac, but has significantly fewer serious upper gastrointestinal events.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2006

Impact of adherence to concomitant gastroprotective therapy on nonsteroidal-related gastroduodenal ulcer complications.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The clinical impact of nonadherence to gastroprotective agents (GPAs) coprescribed with anti-inflammatory therapies has not been evaluated. In a large, commercial, managed-care database, we retrospectively characterized the use of GPAs among patients receiving nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs) or cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors (coxibs) and determined the impact of nonadherence on the likelihood of gastroduodenal ulcer complications. METHODS: Analyses identified the populations of patients with concomitant histamine-2 receptor antagonist or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and determined adherence with the prescribed therapy with respect to the duration of anti-inflammatory treatment. Multivariate regression analyses modeled the association between adherence with concomitant protective therapy and the likelihood of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications including peptic ulcer disease, ulcer, and/or upper-GI bleed. RESULTS: Among 144,203 patients newly prescribed anti-inflammatory therapies, 1.8% received concomitant GPA treatment (ns-NSAIDs, 1.4% vs coxibs, 2.6%; P < .0001). The likelihood of GPA use increased with the presence of risk factors: age older than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.5) and prior history of peptic ulcer disease (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.3), esophagitis/gastroesophageal reflux (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 3.5-4.1), ulcer/upper-GI bleed (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), or gastritis (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-2.8). Of patients receiving concomitant PPI therapy, 68% had adherence rates of 80% or more. A significantly higher risk of upper-GI ulcers/complications was observed in ns-NSAID patients with adherence rates of less than 80% compared with adherence rates of 80% or more (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.6), but no such relationship was observed among patients who took coxibs. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients receive concomitant GPA therapy when prescribed anti-inflammatory treatment, although use increased with the presence of risk factors. Adherence to concomitant therapy is paramount to reducing GI events among ns-NSAID users and educational efforts should be undertaken to promote use of and adherence to GPA therapy among these patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison of the incidence of endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcer rates with valdecoxib or naproxen in healthy subjects aged 65 to 75 years.

BACKGROUND: Compared with nonselective NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective inhibitors have been associated with a lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers (in short-term endoscopic studies) and ulcer complications (in long-term trials). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of valdecoxib 20 mg BID and naproxen 500 mg BID, administered for 6.5 days, on the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) mucosa of healthy older subjects (aged 65-75 years) as assessed by UGI endoscopy. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, active-comparator, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, eligible subjects who were free of NSAID or COX-2-selective inhibitor use for 2 weeks and who had normal UGI mucosa (mucosal grading score of 0, based on endoscopic evaluation of both the stomach and duodenum) were randomized. Serologic testing for Helicobacter pylori antibodies was conducted at baseline. No antiulcer medications were permitted. The primary end point was the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers (gastric or duodenal mucosal grading score of 7, as indicated by any lesion with unequivocal depth > or =3 mm in diameter) after 6.5 days of blinded treatment with valdecoxib, naproxen, or placebo. Secondary end points were incidence of gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, and gastroduodenal erosions/ulcers, and the incidence of > or =11 gastroduodenal erosions/ulcers. All documented adverse events were self-reported by subjects or were observed by investigators. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive valdecoxib, 60 to naproxen, and 60 to placebo. Mean (SD) subject age was 68.8 (3.25) years in the valdecoxib group, 68.6 (2.76) years in the naproxen group, and 68.6 (3.14) years in the placebo group (P = NS). In the valdecoxib and naproxen groups, 47.5% and 58.3% of subjects were female, respectively, compared with 56.7% of the placebo group (P = NS). Valdecoxib and placebo were associated with significantly lower incidences of gastroduodenal ulcers than naproxen (1.6% [1 gastroduodenal ulcer/61 patients] and 1.7% [1/59], respectively, vs 22.0% [13/59]; P < 0.001). Compared with naproxen, both valdecoxib and placebo were associated with significantly lower incidences of gastric (1.6% [1/61] and 1.7% [1/59] vs 15.3% [9/59]; both, P < 0.03) and duodenal ulcers (0% [0/61] and 0% [0/59] vs 8.5% [5/59]; both,P < 0.03). In all cases, the incidence of ulcers with valdecoxib was not significantly different from placebo. Results were similar for any erosions/ulcers, and when analyzed by H pylori status. The number of adverse events was low in each group. CONCLUSION: In these healthy older subjects (aged 65-75 years), valdecoxib 20 mg BID was associated with a significantly lower rate of gastroduodenal, gastric, and duodenal ulcers than naproxen 500 mg BID, even after 6.5 days of therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Expression and membrane localization of MCT isoforms along the length of the human intestine.

Recent studies from our laboratory and others have demonstrated the involvement of monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)1 in the luminal uptake of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the human intestine. Functional studies from our laboratory previously demonstrated kinetically distinct SCFA transporters on the apical and basolateral membranes of human colonocytes. Although apical SCFA uptake is mediated by the MCT1 isoform, the molecular identity of the basolateral membrane SCFA transporter(s) and whether this transporter is encoded by another MCT isoform is not known. The present studies were designed to assess the expression and membrane localization of different MCT isoforms in human small intestine and colon. Immunoblotting was performed with the purified apical and basolateral membranes from human intestinal mucosa obtained from organ donor intestine. Immunohistochemistry studies were done on paraffin-embedded sections of human colonic biopsy samples. Immunoblotting studies detected a protein band of approximately 39 kDa for MCT1, predominantly in the apical membranes. The relative abundance of MCT1 mRNA and protein increased along the length of the human intestine. MCT4 (54 kDa) and MCT5 (54 kDa) isoforms showed basolateral localization and were highly expressed in the distal colon. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed that human MCT1 antibody labeling was confined to the apical membranes, whereas MCT5 antibody staining was restricted to the basolateral membranes of the colonocytes. We speculate that distinct MCT isoforms may be involved in SCFA transport across the apical or basolateral membranes in polarized colonic epithelial cells.

Cell Membrane↗

PubMed2005

Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data indicate that cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors cause less gastroduodenal mucosal damage than nonspecific NSAIDS, but their effects on the small bowel mucosa are less well recognized. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) we prospectively evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in healthy subjects treated with celecoxib compared to naproxen plus omeprazole. METHODS: We randomly assigned subjects with normal baseline VCEs to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n = 120), naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 118), or placebo (n = 118) for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject. RESULTS: Baseline VCE found small bowel lesions in 13.8% (57/413) of screened subjects, who became ineligible for randomization. The mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject and the percentage of subjects with these mucosal breaks were 2.99 +/- 0.51, 55% for naproxen/omeprazole compared to 0.32 +/- 0.10, 16% for celecoxib and 0.11 +/- 0.04, 7% for placebo (P < .001, both comparisons). The magnitude of the difference between celecoxib and placebo was small but statistically significant (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy subjects with lesion-free baseline VCEs, celecoxib was associated with significantly fewer small bowel mucosal breaks than naproxen plus omeprazole. This study also showed that the background incidence of small bowel lesions in healthy adults is not insignificant and should be considered in future trials with VCE.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Safety and efficacy of lumiracoxib compared with NSAIDs.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2005

Healing of gastric ulcers with esomeprazole versus ranitidine in patients who continued to receive NSAID therapy: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare orally administered esomeprazole 40 mg once daily and 20 mg once daily with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for the healing of gastric ulcers (GUs) during 8 wks in patients who continued to receive daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial included patients who were receiving nonselective or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective NSAIDs and had at least one GU >or=5 mm but no gastric or duodenal ulcer >25 mm in diameter at the baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). After 4 and 8 wks of treatment, ulcer-healing status was confirmed by EGD. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each treatment group who had no GUs (GU healing rate) at week 8. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were randomized to treatment. At week 8, GU healing rates with esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg were 91.5% (118/129; 95% CI, 86.7-96.3%) and 88.4% (122/138; 95% CI, 83.1-93.7%), respectively, and were significantly higher than the 74.2% rate (98/132; 95% CI, 66.8-81.7%) with ranitidine (p<0.01 for both comparisons). GU healing rates at 4 wks (78.3%[101/129] and 79.0%[109/138] in the esomeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups, respectively) were also significantly higher (p<0.05) than in the ranitidine group (66.7%[88/132]). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg once daily are effective and well-tolerated therapies compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for healing GUs in patients who need to continue NSAID therapy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Valdecoxib is associated with improved dyspepsia-related health compared with nonspecific NSAIDs in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia and related gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are commonly reported by patients taking nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and significantly impact treatment effectiveness, cost, and quality of life. This study sought to evaluate dyspepsia-related health in osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking valdecoxib compared with patients taking nonspecific NSAIDs. METHODS: Analysis of two separate, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: one in RA patients randomized to placebo, valdecoxib (10 and 20 mg once daily [o.d.]) and naproxen (500 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]); one in OA patients randomized to placebo, valdecoxib (10 and 20 mg o.d.), diclofenac (75 mg b.i.d.), or ibuprofen (800 mg three times daily [t.i.d.]). Study population comprised patients with RA in flare or clinically documented OA who required chronic symptomatic treatment with NSAIDs/analgesics. Dyspepsia-related health was evaluated at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 12 (or early termination) using the validated Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) questionnaire. This patient self-report tool consists of scales for evaluating dyspepsia pain intensity, nonpain symptoms, and satisfaction. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population with the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: Valdecoxib was significantly better at endpoint than standard doses of naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen for pain intensity scores (p < 0.05), and provided significantly improved nonpain symptom and satisfaction scores compared with naproxen for patients with RA (p < 0.05). For RA patients, the difference between valdecoxib and naproxen pain intensity scores were clinically meaningful; at all the time points, significantly fewer patients receiving valdecoxib reported severe dyspepsia pain intensity increases (>/=10 points) than those receiving naproxen. At 12 wk, fewer patients receiving valdecoxib reported severe dyspepsia pain intensity increases versus those receiving ibuprofen and diclofenac. CONCLUSIONS: The GI tolerability of valdecoxib is superior to that of nonspecific NSAIDs, and therefore can potentially have a favorable impact on patient quality of life.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2005

Cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors and upper gastrointestinal tolerability in patients with osteoarthritis receiving concomitant low dose aspirin: pooled analysis of 2 trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of celecoxib and rofecoxib in elderly hypertensive patients with osteoarthritis (OA) with or without coadministration of low dose aspirin (ASA) (< or = 325 mg daily). METHODS: Two independently conducted, multicenter, double blind, randomized controlled trials designed to evaluate GI tolerability, in addition to cardiorenal study endpoints, in patients randomized to celecoxib 200 mg once daily (qd; n = 960) or rofecoxib 25 mg qd (n = 942) were analyzed. GI tolerability was assessed using investigator-reported GI symptoms, prespecified as abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and nausea. The pooled incidences of the 3 reported GI symptoms, regardless of severity (mild and moderate to severe), and the incidences of mild or moderate to severe GI symptoms individually were evaluated. RESULTS: In the pooled population, the incidence of the 3 GI symptoms, regardless of severity, was not significantly different for patients receiving celecoxib or rofecoxib. In contrast, the aggregate incidence of moderate to severe GI symptoms for patients receiving rofecoxib (5.2%) was significantly greater than for those receiving celecoxib (3.2%; p < 0.05). Notably, the significant difference between the 2 arms was more pronounced in the population of patients receiving concomitant low dose ASA (rofecoxib 9.7% vs celecoxib 1.5%; p < 0.001). The incidence of moderate to severe GI symptoms was similar with rofecoxib (3.3%) and celecoxib (3.9%; p = 0.564) treatment in patients who did not receive low dose ASA. CONCLUSION: While the GI tolerability was similar in the 2 arms of the entire pooled population, celecoxib 200 mg qd was associated with a significantly lower incidence of moderate to severe GI symptoms than rofecoxib 25 mg qd in patients receiving concomitant low dose ASA.

Aspirin↗

PubMed2004

Ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients receiving nonsteroidalanti-inflammatory drugs plus low-dose aspirin: results of a post HOC subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant aspirin use is a risk factor for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated upper gastrointestinal toxicity. In high-risk individuals, such as those with a history of NSAID-related gastric ulcer bleeding, gastroprotective therapy with a proton pump inhibitor has been reported to reduce the risk of recurrent aspirin-associated gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the efficacy of misoprostol, lansoprazole, and placebo in reducing the risk of gastric or duodenal ulcer recurrence in patients taking NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin. METHODS: This post hoc subanalysis was based on a previous multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in patients who had a history of gastric ulcer, were Helicobacter pylori negative, required chronic NSAID therapy, and were free of gastric or duodenal ulcer on baseline endoscopy. The study treatments were misoprostol 200 microg QID or lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg OD. The subanalysis included data from patients in the intent-to-treat cohort who took aspirin at an amount <or=325 mg/d. The end point was the cumulative rate of gastric ulcers, as assessed by serial endoscopy at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 535 intent-to-treat patients from the primary study, 70 (40 men, 30 women; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [10.0] years; age range, 40-83 years) met the criteria for inclusion in the subanalysis. The proportions of patients who were free of gastric ulcers at the end of 12 weeks were 96% in the misoprostol group, 93% in the lansoprazole 15-mg group, 100% in the lansoprazole 30-mg group, and 35% in the placebo group (P <or= 0.008, each active treatment vs placebo). Adverse events considered possibly or probably related to treatment occurred in 5 (20.0%) misoprostol recipients (4 episodes of diarrhea, 1 episode of abdominal pain), 1 (14.3%) recipient of lansoprazole 30 mg (1 episode of pharyngitis), and 3 (13.6%) placebo recipients (1 episode each of abdominal pain, palpitations, and dyspepsia). CONCLUSIONS: In this subgroup analysis in patients at high risk for recurrence of gastric ulcer, use of cotherapy with misoprostol 200 microg QID or lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg OD significantly lowered the risk for gastric ulcer recurrence.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2004

Challenges in managing NSAID-associated gastrointestinal tract injury.

The use of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or aspirin is associated with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract injury, particularly in high-risk patients (e.g. those with prior upper GI ulcers and ulcer complications, individuals > or = 65 years, or those using high-dose or multiple non-selective NSAIDs). Important management issues regarding NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal toxicity include: (1) the optimal therapeutic approach to accelerate the healing of gastroduodenal ulcers that may become clinically apparent while using NSAIDs and (2) approaches to prevent the development of gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications associated with their continued use. Clinical trials have reproducibly demonstrated that the healing of NSAID-associated gastric and duodenal ulcers is accelerated with the use of acid suppressive agents (e.g. histamine-2-receptor antagonists, H(2)RAs, and proton pump inhibitors, PPIs), even with the continued use of the NSAID. The risk of developing gastroduodenal ulcers or ulcer complications with the continued and long-term use of NSAIDs is now well recognised as an important problem commonly encountered in daily clinical practice. Clinical trials have shown that co-prescription of misoprostol, high-dose H(2)RAs or PPIs can effectively prevent or reduce the rate of gastroduodenal mucosal damage associated with the use of non-selective NSAIDs. Approaching the problem in a different way, COX-2-selective inhibitors circumvent the problem; based on their mechanism of action, these agents are less ulcerogenic in UGI tract as compared with non-selective NSAIDs. In a recently reported trial conducted in high-risk patients (past history of a NSAID-associated UGI ulcer bleed), the use of a COX-2-selective inhibitor or the combination of non-selective NSAID with a PPI resulted in similar efficacy and both strategies reduced the risk of a recurrent UGI event as compared to historical controls. Aspirin is an independent risk factor for UGI tract injury, even at the low doses used for cardiovascular prophylaxis. While a tremendous amount of research supports the use of preventative therapies and interventions to reduce and /or avoid NSAID- or aspirin-associated ulcers and ulcer complications in the UGI tract, these strategies are often times under-utilized, sub- optimally dosed, and/or are associated with poor patient compliance. This reinforces the need for continued clinician and patient education to improve our outcomes of care.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2003

The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance to these recommendations.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2003