Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jay F Piccirillo

Publications and source records attributed to Jay F Piccirillo.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Long-term outcome of facial growth after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether functional endoscopic sinus (FES) surgery performed in children with chronic rhinosinusitis alters facial growth. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective age-matched cohort outcome study performed at a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: Sixty-seven children participated. There were 46 boys and 21 girls, and the mean age was 3.1 years at presentation and 13.2 years at follow-up. There were 46 children who underwent FES surgery and 21 children who did not undergo FES surgery. Quantitative anthropomorphic analysis was performed using 12 standard facial measurements. A facial plastic expert performed qualitative facial analysis. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses showed no statistical significance in facial growth between children who underwent FES surgery and those who did not undergo FES surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no evidence that FES surgery affected facial growth. SIGNIFICANCE: These results will aid physicians when discussing with parents the risks of FES surgery.

Anthropometry↗

Impact of comorbidity on survival after surgical resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: As the mean age in patients with non-small cell lung cancer increases, the proportion of patients with serious comorbidity who are considered for surgical resection also increases. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer have been shown to have a higher burden of comorbidity than do patients with tumors of other sites, such as breast, prostate, colon, and head and neck. The goal of this review was to determine the impact of comorbidity on postoperative and long-term survival after surgical resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: A database analysis of our hospital's tumor registry included 451 patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1999. Comorbidity severity was prospectively determined with the Kaplan-Feinstein Index. Survival data were collected for each patient from the date of operation, with a mean duration of follow-up of 35.7 months. Bivariate statistics and Cox proportional hazards model analyses were used. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.4 years, and 249 (55%) patients were male. The distribution of overall comorbidity severity was none, 142 (31.5%); mild, 150 (33.3%); moderate, 115 (25.5%); and severe, 44 (9.8%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 2.2% (n = 10/451). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher hospital mortality with greater comorbidity: none, 0.7% (n = 1/142); mild, 3.3% (n = 5/150); moderate, 0.9% (n = 1/115); and severe, 6.8% (n = 3/44, P =.055). Kaplan-Meier estimated survivals at 3 years for each level of comorbidity were as follows: none, 85.6%; mild, 74.8%; moderate, 68.8%; and severe, 70.0% (P <.002). After adjustment for age, sex, T status, and tumor histologic type, the relative risks of death as a function of comorbidity were mild, 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.89-2.34); moderate, 2.28 (95% confidence interval 1.43-3.65); and severe; 1.94 (95% confidence interval 1.023-3.70). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity has a significant impact on survival after surgical resection of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. These data may help to explain the lower than expected survival results for patients after surgical resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Actuarial Analysis↗

The impact of comorbidity on outcomes.

Patients often have other diseases, illnesses, or conditions in addition to the disease under study. These other medical conditions are referred to as comorbidity. Comorbidity can impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and selection of therapy. There are a variety of instruments available to measure the type and severity of comorbid ailments. Comorbidity information can be obtained from direct discussions with the patient, a review of the medical record, or from electronic databases that contain billing information. The method of comorbidity assessment can impact on the interpretation of results. Accurate comorbid information will improve the conduct of and generalizability of clinical trials, evaluation of outcomes from observational research, population-based epidemiological studies, and patient-physician communication.

Comorbidity↗