A survey of venous thrombosis models.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jawed Fareed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ever since the introduction of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) for clinical use, one of the major questions raised relates to product interchangeability and the differences between each of the individual LMWH preparations. Although differences between various commercially available products have been described in terms of molecular weight profile and biologic properties, very limited information on the direct comparison of individual products in a defined clinical setting is available at this time. European Pharmacopeia (EP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have developed guidelines to characterize these agents in terms of molecular weight and biologic profiles. On a gravimetric basis, these potency assignments differ for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities in terms of U potency per mg. The relative distribution of various molecular weight components has also been reported to vary. The oligosaccharide composition, microstructural differences in terms of specific sugars and the presence of unique structural features and the interaction with endogenous mediators such as antithrombin (AT) and heparin cofactor II (HC II) also differ. At equivalent anti-Xa levels, the amount of the anti-IIa activity and anticoagulant activity differs. Since the bioavailability and relative pharmacokinetics of the anti-Xa and anti-IIa effects are different, the specific pharmacodynamic effects of these drugs also differ. A large preclinical data base is now available on the differences between various LMWHs. However, only limited clinical data is available in the current literature. To date, the LMWHs have been primarily used for the management of post-surgical DVT. Only smaller dosages (30-40 mg or 2,500 to 4,000 anti-Xa U total dose) have been used. In these studies, because of the low dose and subcutaneous route of administration, the differences in clinical effects are rather small. Since LMWHs are now developed for therapeutic use, where relatively higher doses are used, these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic differences will become more apparent. The reported differences in the clinical efficacy of LMWHs in such indications as unstable angina may be due to their pharmacologic properties and molecular composition. There are also major differences in the non-anticoagulant actions of these agents such as their ability to interact with growth factors and antithrombotic effects. Based on the available literature, it can be concluded that each product exhibits individuality.
Idraparinux sodium, a long-acting anti-Factor Xa synthetic pentasaccharide, is under development by Sanofi-Aventis for the potential prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose response of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) dalteparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during PCI has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. METHODS: This study was performed in three phases. In vitro, ACTs were measured on volunteer (n = 10) blood samples spiked with increasing concentrations of dalteparin or UFH. To extend these observations in vivo, ACTs were then measured in patients (n = 15) who were sequentially treated with IV dalteparin and then UFH. Finally, a larger monitoring study was undertaken involving patients (n = 110) who received dalteparin 60 or 80 international U (IU)/kg alone or followed by abciximab. We measured ACT (Hemochron), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa levels, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentration, and plasma dalteparin concentration. RESULTS: Dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT with a smaller degree of variance as compared to UFH. Five min after administration of IV dalteparin 80 IU/kg the ACT increased from 125 s (122 s, 129 s) to 184 s (176 s, 191 s) (p < 0.001). The aPTT, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, and TFPI concentration also demonstrated significant increases following IV dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT and aPTT are sensitive to IV dalteparin at clinically relevant doses. These data suggest that the ACT may be useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of intravenously administered dalteparin during PCI.
The heparin-derived oligosaccharide C3 (C3) is currently underdevelopment for the prevention and treatment of vascular dementia and senile dementia of Alzheimer's type. C3 exhibits a molecular weight of 2200-2500 Da with a narrow distribution. The objective of the present study was to assess the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of C3 in non-human primates. C3 was administered as an intravenous or subcutaneous bolus dose of 1.0 or 2.5 mg/kg. Anti-factor Xa activity, Heptest clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time were measured to determine pharmacodynamic effects of C3 in plasma. The pharmacokinetics of C3 was primarily characterized by measuring plasma anti-factor Xa activity as a surrogate marker. The rate of absorption and elimination of C3 after administration did not change with increasing dose. The volume of distribution of C3 was small, reflecting a major distribution inside the intravascular space (110-130 ml/kg), and was independent of dose. The total clearance (16.0-21.0 ml/h/kg) and half-life (4-6 h) of C3 were also dose-independent. Within the observed dose range, a 2.5 times of the C3 dose resulted in an area under the plasma concentration-time curve that was approximately 16-27% greater than expected on the basis of linear disposition. These differences could be attributed to the endogenous release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) by C3 at higher doses, which is associated with the vascular effects of C3.
As a result of advanced technology, dramatic developments in the area of new anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs appear to have made a profound impact on the use of LMWHs. Furthermore, because porcine mucosal heparin is used for the preparation of these agents, it is likely that alternative drugs with comparable pharmacologic and clinical efficacy are sought. Antithrombin drugs such as argatroban and hirudin are already approved for alternative management of heparin-compromised patients. Their efficacy in other indications is less superior. The development of specific anti-Xa drugs is slow. Although these agents may inhibit factor Xa and thrombin generation, none of them are capable of mimicking the polytherapeutic effects of LMWHs and thus can only be given in drug combinations. Synthetic and recombinant protein-derived anti-tissue factor agents have also been developed. These drugs only inhibit the tissue factor-mediated process and are limited in their therapeutic spectrum. Plasma-derived and recombinant serine protease inhibitors (serpins) are also available for the management of thrombotic and inflammatory disorders, but these agents cannot be given subcutaneously. Furthermore, because they are proteins, antibodies to these agents are generated. Nucleic acid derivatives (natural and synthetic aptomers) are developed for intravenous administration, but they are relatively weak antithrombotic agents. Dermatans, heparans, and chondroitin sulfates represent nonheparin GAGs, and, in mono-compositional and polycompositional form, these drugs are mainly used for the intravenous management of DVT prophylaxis. They can be given to patients who are heparin compromised. Synthetic heparinomimetics include heparin consensus-binding oligosaccharides and synthetic oligosaccharides with non-serpin affinity. In addition, binding oligosaccharides are conjugated with antithrombin agents to mimic the anti-Xa/anti-IIa activities of heparin. Biotechnology using bacterial and yeast cultures, aqua cultures for marine products, and plant carbohydrates have been the focus of developing heparin analogues. Development of these agents is in the early phase; however, it is likely that this approach may provide a reasonable alternative to LMWHs. Despite these developments, it is unlikely that any of these drugs will have a profound impact on the use of LMWHs in the near future. Unfractionated heparin and LMWHs collectively represent an important group of polypharmacologic drugs without which the management of thrombosis and vascular disorders would not be possible. The continual development of LMWHs in expanded indications did not comprise the use of unfractionated heparin in surgical and interventional cardiovascular indications. Ever since their introduction in the 1980s, the use of LMWHs has continually increased. This is primarily because of expanded indications and growing awareness among the clinicians. It is likely that once an antidote is developed and additional information is available on the mechanism of action of LMWHs, these drugs may gradualty be used for surgery patients. Despite these developments, it is likely that unfractionated heparin will continue to be used for specific indications. Drug combinations with heparins may necessitate dose adjustments, but it is unclear whether unilateral reduction of heparins will be optimal. The coming years will provide useful clinical and applied data on the improved use of unfractionated heparin. LMWHs, and pentasaccharide in the management of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders. In addition, use of these drugs will be extended to many conditions, including cancer, inflammation, sepsis, and autoimmune diseases. Polytherapeutic approaches emphasizing LMWHs as primary and secondary drugs will also have an impact on the management of thrombotic and nonthrombotic disorders. Ultra-LMWHs and synthetic heparinomimetics, such as fondaparinux, that exhibit a narrow pharmacologic spectrum will only be useful in specific indications and in combination with other drugs.
Heparin has been conventionally used as an anticoagulant for medical and surgical indications. Because factor Xa is an essential component of the prothrombinase complex and leads to the generation of thrombin, its inhibition has become a focus of newer antithrombotic drug development. The in vitro anticoagulant profile of DX-9065a, a synthetic direct factor Xa inhibitor, was studied using activated clotting time assay, thrombelastography, and global clotting tests, such as prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), diluted aPTT, Heptest, Heptest-HI, dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT), thrombin time, ecarin clotting time, and amidolytic anti-Xa assay. In addition, the effect of DX-9065a on platelet aggregation and inhibition of thrombin generation markers (FPA, F1+2, and TAT) were studied. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of DX-9065a were also studied in a non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) model. DX-9065a produced a concentration-dependent increase in the Hemochron celite ACT and HemoTec ACT. Clotting times of 538 +/- 19 and 401 +/- 12, respectively, were reached at a concentration of 25 microg/mL signifying that DX-9065a may be useful in interventional cardiological procedures. DX-9065a prolonged the r-time on thrombelastography. DX-9065a did not show any effect on adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-, collagen-, epinephrine-, and arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation at concentrations up to 10 microgram/mL. DX-9065a exhibited a concentration-dependent prolongation of the PT, aPTT, diluted aPTT, Heptest, dRVVT, and reached the clotting times of 51.6, 132, 193, 47.9, 129.9 seconds, respectively, at a final concentration of 12.5 microgram/mL; compared to a control value of 10.6, 30.2, 41.9, 14, 32.2 seconds, respectively. DX-9065a did not affect the ecarin clotting time and thrombin time at concentrations up to 12.5 microgram/mL. Because DX-9065a prolonged the dRVVT, this may impact diagnostic screening of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Anticoagulants and antithrombotic drugs have played a key role in the prophylaxis, treatment and surgica/interventional management of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders. There are several newer drugs which are currently developed for the anticoagulant management of cardiovascular diseases in both the medical and surgical indications. These include the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), antithrombin agents such as the Hirudin, Hirulog and Argatroban and indirect and direct anti-Xa drugs, represented by Pentasaccharide (Arixtra) and DX 9065a, respectively. Several other agents such as the natural and recombinant anti-Xa drugs and anti-tissue factor agents are also developed. The antiplatelet agents include Clopidogrel, Cilostazol, Anplag and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. For the subcutaneous indications, unfractionated heparin is gradually replaced by the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). LMWHs such as the Enoxaparin and Dalteparin are commonly used for the management of acute coronary syndrome. These drugs have been approved for the treatment of unstable angina and are currently undergoing rigorous trials for interventional indications. Arixtra is also developed for various subcutaneous indications. However, it exhibits lower anticoagulant effects and may not be optimal for intravenous and interventional purposes. At a higher dosage when administered intravenously the LMWHs produce varying degrees of anticoagulation at relatively lower activated clotting times (150-200). Several studies in vascular and cardiovascular interventions have shown that even at a relatively lower anticoagulant level the LMWHs are as effective as unfractionated heparin at the recommended dosages which produce a relatively higher level of anticoagulation (ACT > 200 secs.). Thus, these agents are currently developed for interventional and surgical indications. It should be emphasized that different LMWHs produce different degrees of anticoagulation and should therefore be individually optimized for a given interventional or surgical purposes. At a relatively high dosage the levels of LMWHs can be measured by using the ACT and APTT. When administered with such GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors as the Abciximab, Aggrastat or Eptifibratide, these drugs may require dosage adjustment However, since the introduction of the front loading of Clopidogrel, the unqualified use of GP IIb/IIIa is debated. LMWHs will find expanded indications in both the medical and surgical management of patients with cardiovascular disorders including atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. The only approved anti-Xa drug is represented by a synthetic heparinomimetic, namely, Arixtra. This drug is given for the prophylaxis of post orthopedic indications. This agent is undergoing additional clinical trials in the management of coronary artery diseases. Because of the dependence on antithrombin III (AT) and the sole anti-Xa effects, it has a narrow therapeutic index and its efficacy in this indication may be limited. Additional clinical trials are needed at this time to validate the clinical potential of this drug. The antithrombin agents (Hirudin, Hirulog and Argatroban) were initially developed for arterial indications. However, these agents are approved as a substitute anticoagulant in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and PCI. Currently an of these agents are being developed for surgical and interventional use. However, since there is no available antidote at this time, the development is somewhat limited. The antithrombin agents may be useful in patients with HIT which require further clinical validation. Many other anti-Xa agents are also developed. Most of these can be given parenterally. However, the clinical data is somewhat limited. Similarly, several of the new antiplatelet drugs can be administered parenterally and may be useful in CAD. Since most of these newer anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs are mono-therapeutic their therapeutic index is rather limited. Only in combination these agents can mimic heparins. At this time it is safe to state that heparin and its LMW derivatives will remain the anticoagulant of choice for cardiovascular indications until these newer agents have been validated in extended clinical trials in polytherapeutic settings.
Point-of-care-testing (POCT) is performance of a laboratory assay outside the laboratory by nontrained personnel. The advantages of POCT are: more rapid medical decisions, avoidance of long sample transports, and small samples. The disadvantages of POCT are: no laboratory personnel, insufficient calibration, quality control and maintenance, poor documentation, high costs, difficult comparability POCT/central laboratory. Therefore, disposing of a 24-hour central laboratory, the POCT spectrum should be limited to the vital parameters: K+, Ca++, Na+, glucose, creatinine, blood gases, hemoglobin or hematocrit, NH3, lactate. POCT offers no advantages, if the hospital has a rapid transport system such as a pneumatic delivery to the central laboratory. The rapid diagnosis of the acute hemostasis state of a patient should be performed in the 24-hour central laboratory that is connected to all hospital wards via a good pneumatic delivery.
New synthetic direct and indirect factor Xa or factor IIa inhibitors are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disorders, including patients suffering from antiphospholipid syndrome. In this study, the effects of the synthetic direct factor Xa inhibitor DX-9065a, the indirect synthetic heparinomimetic pentasaccharide, and the direct factor IIa inhibitor Argatroban were studied. These two widely used assays for the detection of lupus anticoagulant, namely the tissue thromboplastin inhibition (TTIT) and the dilute Russell viper venom tests (DRWT) proved useful. The drugs were added to a normal human plasma pool ranging in concentration from 0.04 to 10 microg/mL. Using the two tests named above, DX-9065a and Argatroban showed a dose-related prolongation of TTIT and DRWT in the concentration range from 0.04 to 5 micromol/mL, but the pentasaccharide only slightly prolonged the clotting times of these assays even at high concentrations. Argatroban had the more pronounced effect on both tests when compared with DX-9065a (p < 0.001). The most responsive assay for DX-9065a up to a concentration of 2.5 micromol/mL was the DRWT. For Argatroban both TTIT and DRWT were equally responsive. Patients whose plasma was tested for suspected lupus anticoagulant and who have been given DX-9065a or Argatroban may have false-positive results with the TTIT tests and DRWT. This effect should be considered during patient management. These results indicate that these assays could be used for the effective quantitation of the direct factor Xa or factor IIa inhibitors when suitable controls are used.
Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that differs substantially from unfractionated heparin (UFH) in its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Some of the pharmacodynamic features of enoxaparin that distinguish it from UFH are a higher ratio of anti-Xa to anti-IIa activity, more consistent release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, weaker interactions with platelets and less inhibition of bone formation. Enoxaparin has a higher and more consistent bioavailability after subcutaneous administration than UFH, a longer plasma half-life and is less strongly bound to plasma proteins. These properties mean that enoxaparin provides a more reliable anticoagulant effect without the need for laboratory monitoring, and also offers the convenience of once-daily administration. Clinical studies have confirmed that these pharmacological advantages translate into improved outcomes. There are important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between enoxaparin, other LMWHs and UFH, and therefore these molecules cannot be regarded as interchangeable.
CONTEXT: It is now widely accepted that the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is mediated by the generation of a wide array of functional and molecularly heterogeneous anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies that may mediate platelet and/or endothelial cell activation/destruction. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the differential prevalence and functionality of AHPF4 immunoglobulin subtypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) in plasmas obtained from orthopedic patients immobilized with Plaster-Cast and treated with clivarin (a low-molecular-weight heparin) in comparison to a placebo for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Clivarin was administered subcutaneously at a fixed daily dosage of 1750 U without any adjustment or loading dosage. Citrated plasmas were obtained at baseline, at 10 to 14 days, and at postbrace procedure (5-12 weeks). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to quantitate the AHPF4 antibody titers. The functionality of the ELISA-positive samples was determined by a 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA). RESULTS: In the ELISA test, 16 of 1073 samples (1.5%; 6 in clivarin and 10 in placebo groups) were positive for AHPF4 antibodies (mean optical density [OD] = 0.46 +/- 0.02). None of the ELISA-positive samples for AHPF4 antibodies could mediate platelet activation responses as determined by the SRA (0%-3% serotonin release, P >.10, n = 16). Through differential immunoglobulin subtype analysis of the samples positive for (cumulative) AHPF4 antibodies, we determined that their relative prevalence in plasma were as follows: IgM (mean OD = 0.71 +/- 0.13) > IgG (0.31 +/- 0.08) > IgA (0.14 +/- 0.02). Although there was no significant difference in the total antibody titers between clivarin and placebo groups, the antibody subtyping data showed conversion trends (ie, IgA [clivarin to placebo], IgG [placebo to clivarin], and IgM [clivarin to placebo]). CONCLUSION: These observations indicate that even at reduced dosages, clivarin can shift the immunogenic up-regulation toward the IgG subpopulation; however, the IgG subtype is of a nonfunctional type of AHPF4 antibody and thus may not cause any HIT-related pathogenic responses.
Serine proteases play an important role in thrombogenesis, the process that leads to blood clotting and conditions such as heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular disorders. In the coagulation network, the activation of various serine proteases facilitates the formation of the serine protease Factor Xa, which plays a central role in the process of coagulation and platelet activation. Factor Xa is an essential component of the prothrombinase complex, from which thrombin is formed, which then directly leads to fibrin clot formation. Thus, the inhibition of Factor Xa and its generation is an important strategy in the development of new antithrombotic drugs.
The pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is mediated via a heterogeneous group of heparin(s)-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complexes bound to their antibodies. These anti-H-PF4 (AHPF4) antibodies that are capable of binding to the FcgammaRIIA receptor [cluster of differentiation (CD) 32] on platelets, resulting in platelet activation, widely vary in their specific activities as platelet activation (functionality). Predisposing factors related to specific pathologic conditions may also contribute to the generation of these antibodies and their relative functionality during HIT syndrome. To understand this phenomenon, a sub-study was carried out in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee replacement surgery (ECHOS Study) and who were treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Clivarin). Approximately 600 patients per arm [UFH=7,500 anti-Xa U twice a day (b.i.d.) subcutaneous (s.c.) and clivarin=4200 U once daily (o.d.) s.c.], age >40 years, received prophylactic treatment for a minimum of 11-14 days. Plasma samples were collected at pre-dose, days 2-4, days 11-14 and at follow-up 6-8 weeks after discharge and were analyzed for AHPF4 antibody titers. Functionality of the enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)-positive AHPF4 antibodies to cause platelet activation was tested by 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Both UFH and clivarin treatments in orthopedic surgical patients resulted in a progressive generation of AHPF4 antibodies. The relative prevalence/functionality of AHPF4 antibodies in clivarin arm was markedly lower (two- to threefold, p<0.001) as compared to UFH at each time point. Most of the samples in clivarin group were found to be SRA negative, suggesting the presence of AHPF4 antibodies that did not activate platelets (nonfunctional). Within the UFH arm, the relative prevalence/functionality of AHPF4 antibodies was much higher (p<0.002) in knee group compared to the corresponding hip group. This study, for the first time, reports on the elevated levels of AHPF4 antibodies generated by heparin associated with the pathogenesis of knee surgery. Clinical significance of the differential generation of HIT-associated antibodies remains unexplored at this time.
Previous studies have shown different roles for proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology. Using a rat model of beta-amyloid induced neuropathology, we tested whether low molecular weight glycosaminoglycans (Certoparin and C6) could be useful as preventative agents and/or as a potential therapeutic treatment for AD. Chronic subcutaneous low molecular weight glycosaminoglycan injections beginning either before or after an intra-amygdaloid beta-amyloid-(25-35) injection blocked abnormal intracellular tau changes and reactive astrocytosis but did not affect beta-amyloid's aggregation state. Also, low molecular weight glycosaminoglycan injections beginning 1 day prior to sacrifice did not block the effects of beta-amyloid nor did injections of a disaccharide, suggesting chronic low molecular weight glycosaminoglycan treatment is needed to block the effects of beta-amyloid. Furthermore, these data indicate that there is a molecular weight range of active low molecular weight glycosaminoglycans in this model; and supports the investigation of low molecular weight glycosaminoglycans as a preventative and/or therapeutic treatment of beta-amyloid induced neuropathology.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the responses of human and non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) platelets to anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies. Due to the variations observed in the functionality and immunoglobulin isotypes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), we used highly characterized human AHPF4 antibodies to study platelet activation responses. Using ELISA and 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) systems, three patients' plasmapheresis fluid with similar responses to these assays were pooled. This pool was then used to study the platelet activation responses of human and primate platelets in the HIT platelet aggregation assay, a flow cytometry assay, and a variation of the aggregation assay in which glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were supplemented. In the plasmapheresis fluid from three patients, the most significant AHPF4 immunoglobulin isotype present (based on optical density readings) was IgG, with less IgM (p < 0.001) and IgA (p < 0.001). The SRA yielded equivalent platelet activation results in all three patients. Using this pool in the platelet aggregation assay, without any heparin present, there was less percent aggregation (p < 0.001) with human platelets (11.8 +/- 2.35, n = 5) compared to the primate platelets (54.3 +/- 10.2, n = 9). In presence of 0.4 U/ml heparin, both platelet types had similar percent aggregations (p > 0.05). Three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors were used to evaluate the similarities in platelet activation. Eptifibatide was found to be a strong inhibitor of both species' platelet types at concentrations greater than 0.01 microg/ml. This was not the case with tirofiban which inhibited both human and monkey platelets at concentrations greater than 0.025 microg/ml. Abciximab inhibited aggregation at concentrations greater than 6.25 microg/ml. These data indicate that phylogenetic similarities in platelets of humans and primates may be used to further characterize the pathophysiology of HIT syndrome.
Low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparins are frequently used to treat venous thromboembolism, but it is not known whether they are equally effective in inhibiting in vivo generation of thrombin. In this multicenter trial, 1048 patients were randomized to intravenous unfractionated heparin (group A), twice daily low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) for 1 week (group B), or once daily reviparin for 4 weeks (group C). All patients received vitamin K antagonists. Blood samples withdrawn at the baseline and at weeks 1 and 3 were analyzed using markers of in vivo thrombin generation and other coagulation parameters. During the first 3 weeks symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis-pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) occurred in 17 (4.5%) of 375 patients in group A compared with 4 (1.0%) of 388 patients in group B, and 9 (2.4%) of 374 patients in group C. Forty percent of patients in group A, 53.4% in group B, and 53.5% in group C showed 30% or greater reduction in thrombus size assessed by venography. Patients in group B had significantly greater reduction in D-dimer, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (F1 + 2), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes compared to groups A and C. Greater release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and reduction in levels of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and fibrinogen were significantly more pronounced in group C patients. Reviparin administered twice daily plus vitamin K antagonist is more effective in inhibiting in vivo thrombin generation compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin plus vitamin K antagonist, and reviparin once daily produced significantly higher TFPI release and greater reduction in TAFI and fibrinogen levels.