Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng

Publications and source records attributed to Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Inclusion of biological factors in parallel-architecture normal-tissue complication probability model for radiation-induced liver disease.

PURPOSE: To include biologic factors in parallel-architecture normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for gastric or hepatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 151 patients (89 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 62 with gastric cancer) who received 3D-CRT to the liver were included (isocenter dose range 33.0 to 66.0 Gy; mean 48.0 Gy). RILD was defined as grade 3 or higher liver toxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute within 4 months after 3D-CRT. Possible correlations of patient-related or dosimetric factors with RILD were tested. Maximum-likelihood analysis estimated NTCP model parameters for group and subgroups. Goodness-of-fit analysis estimated deviance of NTCP model parameters between subgroups. RESULTS: RILD developed in 25 patients. Hepatitis B virus carrier status (p < 0.001) was the only significant independent factor. The 4 parallel NTCP model parameters, mean functional reserve (V(50)), width of functional reserve distribution (sigma), dose damage to 50% of liver subunits (D(50)), and slope parameter for subunit dose-response (k), were respectively, 0.54, 0.14, 50 Gy, 0.18 (group); 0.53, 0.07, 50 Gy, 4.6 x 10(-7) (carriers); 0.59, 0.12, 25 Gy, 59.8 (noncarriers). In carrier-state subgroups, goodness-of-fit deviance with 1 subgroup's parameter set would have been worse in the other group. Across subgroups, patients with RILD all had liver fraction damage (f) greater than 0.4 compared with wider distribution for the whole group. CONCLUSIONS: RILD is described with a parallel-architecture NTCP model for HBV carriers and noncarriers with a threshold effect greater than 0.4. The main difference is in slope parameter for subunit dose-response.

Adult↗

Biologic susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy to radiation-induced liver disease.

PURPOSE: To identify the factors associated with radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and to describe the difference in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) between subgroups of hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 89 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who completed 3D-CRT for local hepatic tumors were included. The average isocenter dose was 49.9 +/- 6.2 Gy. Logistic regression analysis was used for the association between statistically significant factors and RILD (defined as Grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicity of elevated transaminases or alkaline phosphatase within 4 months of completing 3D-CRT) in multivariate analysis. Maximal likelihood analysis was conducted to obtain the best estimates of the NTCP model parameters. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 17 developed RILD. In univariate analysis, hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive status and the mean radiation dose to the liver were the two factors significantly associated with the development of RILD. Of the 65 patients who were HBV carriers, 16 had RILD compared with 1 of 24 non-carrier patients (p = 0.03). The mean radiation dose to liver was significantly greater in patients with RILD (22.9 vs. 19.0 Gy, p = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, HBV carrier status (odds ratio, 9.26; p = 0.04) and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis of the liver (odds ratio, 3.65; p = 0.04) remained statistically significant. The best estimates of the NTCP parameters were n = 0.35, m = 0.39, and TD(50)(1) = 49.4 Gy. The n, m, TD(50)(1) specifically estimated from the HBV carriers was 0.26, 0.40, and 50.0 Gy, respectively, compared with 0.86, 0.31, and 46.1 Gy, respectively, for non-carrier patients. CONCLUSION: Hepatocellular carcinoma patients who were HBV carriers or had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis presented with a statistically significantly greater susceptibility to RILD after 3D-CRT.

Adult↗

Unexpectedly frequent hepatitis B reactivation by chemoradiation in postgastrectomy patients.

BACKGROUND: Postgastrectomy patients undergoing chemoradiation risk chemoradiation-induced liver disease (CRILD). The objectives of this study were to investigate dosimetric implications and assess biologic susceptibility to CRILD in these patients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with Stage IB-IV gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma without metastases underwent radical total/subtotal gastrectomy; regional lymph node dissection; and postoperative, adjuvant, concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Among these, 8 patients developed CRILD (defined as Grade 3-4 liver toxicity), and 11 patients were chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (HBV+). Chemotherapy consisted of 1 cycle of etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (ELF); followed by 5 weekly high doses of 5-fluorouracil (2000-2600 mg/m2) and leucovorin concurrent with radiotherapy (median dose, 45 grays [Gy] to the tumor bed/regional lymphatics); followed by 3 cycles of ELF separated by a 21-day interval. Patients were followed for > or = 4 months after CCRT. Patient-related and dosimetric factors were correlated with CRILD. RESULTS: HBV+ status was the only independent factor associated with CRILD. HBV+ patients had a higher CRILD incidence (6 of 11 patients vs. 2 of 51 patients; P < 0.001). HBV-negative patients with CRILD were recipients of a higher mean liver dose (MLD) (23.8 Gy vs. 15.2 Gy; P = 0.009) and a higher volume fraction of liver that received > 30 Gy (36.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.009) compared with noncarriers without CRILD, but no MLD difference was found between HBV+ patients with or without CRILD. Moreover, in four of six carriers with CRILD, HBV infection was reactivated during CRILD. Two of the toxicities were fatal. CONCLUSIONS: HBV carriers had a higher incidence of CRILD after postgastrectomy CCRT, probably related to HBV reactivation. Dosimetric parameters modulated the risk of CRILD in noncarriers, but not in carriers. These factors deserve attention in CRILD/HBV+ patients, and the underlying pathogenesis warrants investigation.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Recent advances in non-surgical treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and is the leading cause of cancer death in Taiwan. Curative surgery is feasible for only about 30% of patients. Transarterial embolization or chemoembolization (TAE/TACE) has been demonstrated to provide a survival benefit compared with supportive care for HCC patients with adequate liver reserves, tumors confined to the liver, and no evidence of portal vein thrombosis. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) may provide long-term disease control if the extent of liver tumors is limited (3 or less in number and less than 3 cm in diameter). The relative efficacy of TAE/TACE, PEI, and other locoregional treatment modalities, such as radiofrequency ablation or cryosurgery, remains unclear. Radiotherapy has been used mostly as a salvage therapy in combination with other locoregional modalities. Despite the incorporation of 3-dimensional conformal technology, radiation-induced liver injury remains an important problem, especially for patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. Systemic therapy is difficult for HCC because of the underlying cirrhosis and accompanying hypersplenism and peripheral cytopenia. HCC is typically resistant to most cytotoxic agents. Biochemical modulation with high-dose tamoxifen may sensitize HCC cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and improve the clinical response to doxorubicin in patients with advanced HCC. Thalidomide, which inhibits angiogenesis induced by vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, can produce a response in some HCC patients. Future research on drug therapy for HCC will focus on identification of tumor-specific targets.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

Unique role of proximal rectal dose in late rectal complications for patients with cervical cancer undergoing high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation of the radiation dose to the upper rectum, proximal to the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) rectal point, with late rectal complications in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1997 and February 2001, 75 patients with cervical carcinoma completed definitive or preoperative RT and were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 75 patients, 62 with complete dosimetric data and a minimal follow-up of at least 1 year were included in this analysis. Of the 62 patients, 36 (58%) also received concurrent chemotherapy, mainly with cisplatin during EBRT. EBRT consisted of a mean of 50.1 +/- 1.3 Gy of 18-MV photons to the pelvis. A parametrial boost was given to 55 patients. Central shielding was used after 40-45 Gy of pelvic RT. HDR ICRT followed EBRT, with a median dose of 5 Gy/fraction given twice weekly for a median of four fractions. The mean dose to point A from HDR ICRT was 23.9 +/- 3.0 Gy. In addition to the placement of a rectal tube with a lead wire during ICRT, 30-40 mL of contrast medium was instilled into the rectum to demonstrate the anterior rectal wall up to the rectosigmoid junction. Late rectal complications were recorded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading system. The maximal rectal dose taken along the rectum from the anal verge to the rectosigmoid junction and the ICRU rectal dose were calculated. Statistical tests were used for the correlation of Grade 2 or greater rectal complications with patient-related variables and dosimetric factors. Correlations among the point A dose, ICRU rectal dose, and maximal proximal rectal dose were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (23%) developed Grade 2 or greater rectal complications. Patient-related factors, definitive or preoperative RT, and the use of concurrent chemotherapy were not associated with the occurrence of rectal complications. The maximal rectal dose during ICRT was at the proximal rectum rather than at the ICRU rectal point in 55 (89%) of 62 patients. Patients with Grade 2 or greater rectal complications had received a significantly greater total maximal proximal rectal dose from ICRT (25.6 Gy vs. 19.2 Gy, p = 0.019) and had a greater maximal proximal rectal dose/point A dose ratio (1.025 vs. 0.813, p = 0.024). In contrast, patients with and without rectal complications had a similar dose at point A (25.0 Gy vs.23.6 Gy, p = 0.107). The differences in the ICRU rectal dose (17.8 Gy vs.15.4 Gy, p = 0.065) and the ICRU rectal dose/point A dose ratio (0.71 vs. 0.66, p = 0.210) did not reach statistical significance. Patients with >62 Gy of a direct dose sum from EBRT and ICRT to the proximal rectum (12 of 29 vs. 2 of 33, p = 0.001) and >110 Gy of a total maximal proximal rectal biologic effective dose (13 of 40 vs. 1 of 22, p = 0.012) presented with a significantly increased frequency of Grade 2 or greater rectal complications. The correlations between the maximal proximal rectal dose and the ICRU rectal dose were less satisfactory (Pearson coefficient 0.375). Moreover, 11 of the 14 patients with rectal complications had colonoscopic findings of radiation colitis at the proximal rectum, the area with the maximal rectal dose. CONCLUSION: Eighty-nine percent of our patients had a maximal rectal dose from ICRT at the proximal rectum instead of the ICRU rectal point. The difference between patients with and without late rectal complications was more prominent for the proximal rectal dose than for the ICRU rectal dose. It is important and useful to contrast the whole rectal wall up to the rectosigmoid junction and to calculate the dose at the proximal rectum for patients undergoing HDR ICRT.

Adult↗

Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease.

PURPOSE: This study compares the difference in dose-volume data between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and previously documented radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after 3D-CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 68 patients with HCC were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Twelve of them were diagnosed with RILD within 4 months of completion of 3D-CRT. RILD was defined as either anicteric elevation of alkaline phosphatase level of at least twofold and nonmalignant ascites, or elevated transaminases of at least fivefold the upper limit of normal or of pretreatment levels. Three-dimensional treatment planning using dose-volume histograms of normal liver was used to obtain the dose-volume data. These 12 patients with RILD were replanned with an IMRT planning system using the five-field (gantry angles 0 degrees, 72 degrees, 144 degrees, 216 degrees, and 288 degrees ) step-and-shoot technique to compare the dosimetric difference in targets and organs at risk between 3D-CRT and IMRT. Mean dose and normal tissue complication probability with literature-cited volume effect parameter of 0.32, curve steepness parameter of 0.15, and TD(50)(1) of 40 Gy, were used for the liver, whereas volume fraction at a given dose level was used for other critical structures. Paired Student t-test with 2-tailed p < 0.05 was used to assess the statistical difference between the two techniques. RESULTS: With comparable target coverage between 3D-CRT and five-field step-and-shoot IMRT, IMRT was able to obtain a large dose reduction in the spinal cord (5.7% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.007), and achieved at least similar organ sparing for kidneys and stomach. IMRT had diverse dosimetric effect on liver, with significant reduction in normal tissue complication probability (23.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), but significant increase in mean dose (2924 cGy vs. 2504 cGy, p = 0.009), as compared with 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is capable of preserving acceptable target coverage and improving or at least maintaining the nonhepatic organ sparing for patients with HCC and previously diagnosed RILD after 3D-CRT. The true impact of this technique on the liver remains unsettled and may depend on the exact volume effect of this organ.

Adult↗

Radiation-induced liver disease after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric analysis and implication.

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) with patient-related and treatment-related dose-volume factors and to describe the probability of RILD by a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1993 and December 1999, 93 patients with intrahepatic malignancies were treated with 3D-CRT at our institution. Sixty-eight patients who were diagnosed with HCC and had complete 3D dose-volume data were included in this study. Of the 68 patients, 50 had chronic viral hepatitis before treatment, either type B or type C. According to the Child-Pugh classification for liver cirrhosis, 53 patients were in class A and 15 in class B. Fifty-two patients underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with an interval of at least 1 month between transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and 3D-CRT to allow adequate recovery of hepatic function. The mean dose of radiation to the isocenter was 50.2 +/- 5.9 Gy, in daily fractions of 1.8-2Gy. No patient received whole liver irradiation. RILD was defined as Grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicity according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute. All patients were evaluated for RILD within 4 months of RT completion. Three-dimensional treatment planning with dose-volume histogram analysis of the normal liver was used to compare the dosimetric difference between patients with and without RILD. Maximal likelihood analysis was conducted to obtain the best estimates of parameters of the Lyman NTCP model. Confidence intervals of the fitted parameters were estimated by the profile likelihood method. RESULTS: Twelve of the 68 patients developed RILD after 3D-CRT. None of the patient-related variables were significantly associated with RILD. No difference was found in tumor volume (780 cm(3) vs. 737 cm(3), p = 0.86), normal liver volume (1210 cm(3) vs. 1153 cm(3), p = 0.64), percentage of normal liver volume with radiation dose >30 Gy (V(30 Gy); 42% vs. 33%, p = 0.05), and percentage of normal liver volume with >50% of the isocenter dose (V(50%); 45% vs. 36%, p = 0.06) between patients with and without RILD. The mean hepatic dose was significantly higher in patients with RILD (2504 cGy vs. 1965 cGy, p = 0.02). The probability of RILD in patients could be expressed as follows: probability = 1/[1 + exp(-(0.12 x mean dose - 4.29))], with coefficients significantly different from 0. The best estimates of the parameters in the Lyman NTCP model were the volume effect parameter of 0.40, curve steepness parameter of 0.26, and 50% tolerance dose for uniform irradiation of whole liver [TD(50)(1)] of 43 Gy. Patients with RILD had a significantly higher NTCP than did those with no RILD (26.2% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.006), using the best-estimated parameters. CONCLUSION: Dose-volume histogram analysis can be effectively used to quantify the tolerance of the liver to RT. Patients with RILD had received a significantly higher mean dose to the liver and a significantly higher NTCP. The fitted volume effect parameter of the Lyman NTCP model was close to that from the literature, but much lower in our patients with HCC and prevalent chronic viral hepatitis than that reported in other series with patients with normal liver function. Additional efforts should be made to test other models to describe the radiation tolerance of the liver for Asian patients with HCC and preexisting compromised hepatic reserve.

Adult↗

Improvement of local control of T3 and T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma by hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: When the primary tumor of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is treated at the base of skull and intracranium with conventional radiotherapy, the result is generally poor. In this report, we investigated whether hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CCT) could achieve better local control and survival in NPC patients with T3 and T4 lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (11 T3 and 37 T4 NPC) were treated with HFRT and CCT. HFRT was administered at 1.2 Gy per fraction, two fractions per day, Monday-Friday for 62 fractions for a total dose of 74.4 Gy. Concomitant chemotherapy consisting of cis-diamino-dichloroplatinum (CDDP) alone or CDDP and 5-fluorouracil was delivered simultaneously with radiotherapy during Weeks 1 and 6. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of CDDP and 5-fluorouracil for 2 to 3 cycles and was given monthly beginning 1 month after completion of radiation. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 57 months (range: 28-94 months), the 3-year locoregional control rate was 93%, the disease-free survival rate was 71%, and the overall survival rate was 72%. For T4 patients, the 3-year locoregional control rate was 91%, disease-free survival was 62%, and overall survival was 63%. The major acute toxicity was Grade 3 mucositis in 73% and Grade 2 weight loss in 31% of patients. Fifty percent of patients were tube fed. Most patients tolerated the combined modality treatments relatively well; 88% of patients completed their radiation treatment within 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: HFRT and CCT for T3 and T4 NPC were associated with excellent local control and improved survival. The treatment-related toxicity was acceptable and reversible. We would recommend using HFRT with CCT for advanced T-stage NPC if the three-dimensional conformal radiation planning shows a significant portion of the brainstem to be inside the treatment field.

Adult↗

Locoregional failure of postmastectomy patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes without adjuvant radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the incidence and risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast cancer who had T1 or T2 primary tumor and 1-3 histologically involved axillary lymph nodes treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1991 and December 1998, 125 patients with invasive breast cancer were treated with modified radical mastectomy and were found to have 1-3 positive axillary nodes. The median number of nodes examined was 17 (range 7-33). Of the 125 patients, 110, who had no adjuvant RT and had a minimum follow-up of 25 months, were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and 84 received adjuvant hormonal therapy with tamoxifen. Patient-related characteristics (age, menopausal status, medial/lateral quadrant of tumor location, T stage, tumor size, estrogen/progesterone receptor protein status, nuclear grade, extracapsular extension, lymphovascular invasion, and number of involved axillary nodes) and treatment-related factors (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) were analyzed for their impact on LRR. The median follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: Of 110 patients without RT, 17 had LRR during follow-up. The 4-year LRR rate was 16.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1-23.1%). All but one LRR were isolated LRR without preceding or simultaneous distant metastasis. According to univariate analysis, age <40 years (p = 0.006), T2 classification (p = 0.04), tumor size >==3 cm (p = 0.002), negative estrogen receptor protein status (p = 0.02), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.02), and no tamoxifen therapy (p = 0.0006) were associated with a significantly higher rate of LRR. Tumor size (p = 0.006) was the only risk factor for LRR with statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. On the basis of the 4 patient-related factors (age <40 years, tumor >==3 cm, negative estrogen receptor protein, and lymphovascular invasion), the high-risk group (with 3 or 4 factors) had a 4-year LRR rate of 66.7% (95% CI 42.8-90.5%) compared with 7.8% (95% CI 2.2-13.3%) for the low-risk group (with 0-2 factors; p = 0.0001). For the 110 patients who received no adjuvant RT, LRR was associated with a 4-year distant metastasis rate of 49.0% (9 of 17, 95% CI 24.6-73.4%). For patients without LRR, it was 13.3% (15 of 93, 95% CI 6.3-20.3%; p = 0.0001). The 4-year survival rate for patients with and without LRR was 75.1% (95% CI 53.8-96.4%) and 88.7% (95% CI 82.1-95.4%; p = 0.049), respectively. LRR was independently associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis and worse survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: LRR after mastectomy is not only a substantial clinical problem, but has a significant impact on the outcome of patients with T1 or T2 primary tumor and 1-3 positive axillary nodes. Patients with risk factors for LRR may need adjuvant RT. Randomized trials are warranted to determine the potential benefit of postmastectomy RT on the survival of patients with a T1 or T2 primary tumor and 1-3 positive nodes.

Adult↗

Radiation-induced liver disease after radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical manifestation and dosimetric description.

Twelve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic hepatitis developed radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Six patients died of RILD and six recovered. Mean prescribed dose was 50.6+/-4.3Gy, in a daily fraction of 1.8-2.0Gy. Commonly used dosimetric parameters, such as fraction volume of normal liver with radiation dose >30Gy, prediction score, and normal tissue complication probability, failed to differentiate the fatality and clinical types of this complication. Elevated transaminases are more frequently seen than ascites and elevated alkaline phosphamide are seen in patients with RILD.

Adult↗

The application of Aquaplast Thermoplastic as a bolus material in the radiotherapy of a patient with classic Kaposi's sarcoma at the lower extremity.

BACKGROUND: The classic Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) patients usually present with progressive skin lesions over the lower extremities, following an indolent course. Although radiotherapy is an effective treatment for KS, radiation over these lesions is not without difficulty. The intrinsic difficulty resides in how a homogenous radiation dose over superficial lesions involving large areas and irregular surface is properly delivered. Several bolus techniques have thus been invented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Aquaplast RT Thermoplastic is a new type of bolus material that can be easily molded and conformed to the curvature of skin, with the equivalence to soft tissue in radiation interaction. RESULTS: This material was applied as the bolus for the irradiation of a classic KS patient, whose disease involved multiple skin areas over the right heel and ankle. Large parallel-opposed irradiation fields delivered by 60Co were used. Computed tomography demonstrated a close conformity of the bolus built-up by Aquaplast RT Thermoplastic to the surface of the ankle and foot. A dosimetry measurement further confirmed an adequate and homogenous distribution of desired dose around the lesions of the lower extremity. After a total dose of 39 Gy, divided in 13 fractions, the lesions remitted completely. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the use of Aquaplast RT Thermoplastic as a bolus material is helpful in delivering adequate dose to skin lesions of the lower extremities.

Aged↗

Radiotherapy of classic Kaposi's sarcoma in Taiwan, an area where classic Kaposi's sarcoma is not prevalent.

BACKGROUND: Classic Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), a neoplastic disease of vascular endothelial cells of the skin, is relatively prevalent in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean region and radiation is one of the standard therapies. The clinical presentation and treatment results of classic KS from other regions have rarely been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2006, patients who had histologically confirmed KS and no immunodeficiency status due to human immunodeficiency virus infection or organ transplantation, and were treated with radiotherapy at Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Japan, were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 17 classic KS patients, with a median age of 69 years, were studied over a period of 12 years. All classic KS lesions involved lower extremities. Radiotherapy was delivered with either a 60Co unit or a linear accelerator, with the most commonly prescribed treatment being 3 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 39 Gy. In addition, several techniques using bolus were adopted to improve the radiation distribution over the skin of lower extremities. All irradiated KS lesions responded, with a complete response rate of 76%. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates of the group at 5 years were 85% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for classic KS patients in a non-prevalent area, such as Taiwan, is safe and effective.

Aged↗