Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Janus Laust Thomsen

Publications and source records attributed to Janus Laust Thomsen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Excessive workload, uncertain career opportunities and lack of funding are important barriers to recruiting and retaining primary care medical researchers: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Research activity in primary care has been steadily increasing, but is still insufficient and more researchers are needed. Many initiatives have been launched to recruit and retain primary care researchers, but only little is known about barriers and facilitators to a research career in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To examine barriers and facilitators to recruiting and retaining primary care medical researchers. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 33 primary care medical researchers, all medical doctors. We used a phenomenological approach to analysing the interviews. RESULTS: Important barriers to pursuing a research career in primary care were heavy workload, isolation at work, short-term funding and low salary. Important facilitators to attracting and retaining primary care researchers were the desire and opportunity to improve primary care, the flexible working conditions, the career opportunities, including the possibility of combining university-based research with clinical work and a friendly and competent research environment. CONCLUSION: Better strategies for recruiting and retaining researchers are a prerequisite for the development of primary care, and in future the main emphasis should be on working conditions, networking and mentoring. Studies including those primary care physicians who have chosen not to do research are highly needed.

Adult↗

Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice.

BACKGROUND: The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a common diagnostic test available to the GP in the evaluation of patients with cardiac complaints. In daily clinical practice it is important for GPs to know the sensitivity and specificity of their ECG interpretation skills. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ECG interpretation skills of GPs and the value of automatic ECG recorder interpretations in general practice. METHODS: A total of 902 ECGs were recorded in a random sample of the population aged 31-51 years in the district of Ebeltoft, Denmark, from December 1991 to June 1992. They were interpreted automatically by an interpretive ECG recorder and by the GPs in the clinic in Ebeltoft, with a cardiologists interpretation as a gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of diagnoses were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, the sensitivity of abnormal diagnoses made by the GPs (69.8%) was significantly lower (P <0.001) than that of diagnoses made by the interpretive ECG recorder (84.4%). The overall specificity of abnormal diagnoses made by the GP (85.7%) was significantly higher (P <0.001) than that achieved by the interpretive ECG recorder (75.6%). CONCLUSIONS: GPs in this study were good at correcting false-positive diagnoses made by the interpretive ECG recorder. In order to avoid unfortunate reclassifications of true-positive to false-negative diagnoses, GPs are recommended to pay special attention to the diagnoses of ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversion or the presence of Q-waves made by interpretive ECG recorders, when ECGs are used in individual risk assessment.

Adult↗