Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jannick Brennum

Publications and source records attributed to Jannick Brennum.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

[Brain metastases].

The incidence of symptomatic brain metastases in Denmark is about 3500. In the present review, the aetiology, symptomatology, and diagnostic procedures are described. The main topic is a review of current treatments and the evidence for their efficacy. Treatment of brain metastases rarely cures the patient, the goal is rather to improve the quality of life and prolong survival. Without treatment, the median survival following diagnosis of brain metastases is about one month, with steroid treatment two months, with whole brain irradiation four to six months, and after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery 10-12 months. A relatively simple treatment scheme based on the number of brain metastases and the overall condition of the patient is provided.

Brain Neoplasms↗

Capsaicin evoked pain and allodynia in post-herpetic neuralgia.

The hypothesis that the pain and allodynia associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is maintained by a combination of input from preserved primary afferent nociceptors and sensitization of central pain transmitting neurons was examined in 17 subjects with PHN. Pain, allodynia, thermal sensory function, cutaneous innervation, and response to controlled application of 0.075% capsaicin were measured. Compared to mirror-image skin, applying capsaicin on a 9 cm(2) area of PHN skin significantly increased overall PHN pain and allodynia in 11 of 17 subjects. These 'capsaicin responders' were characterized by higher average daily pain, higher allodynia ratings, and relatively preserved sensory function at baseline compared to the non-responders. In three of the 'capsaicin responders' the area of allodynia expanded into previously non-allodynic and non-painful skin that had normal sensory function and cutaneous innervation. These observations support the hypothesis that allodynia in some PHN patients is a form of chronic secondary hyperalgesia maintained by input from intact and possibly 'irritable' primary afferent nociceptors to a sensitized CNS.

Administration, Topical↗

Quantitative sensory examination of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in man: effects of pre- and post-traumatic morphine on hyperalgesia.

The objectives of the study were: (1) comparison of hypoalgesic effects of pre- and post-traumatic epidural morphine (EM) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia, and (2) comparison of EM hypoalgesia in normal and injured skin. Burn injuries (25 x 50 mm rectangular thermode, 47 degrees C, 7 min) were produced on the calves of healthy volunteers, at 2 different days at least 1 week apart. In randomized order, the subjects received 4 mg of EM administered via the L2-L3 intervertebral space on one day and no treatment on the other day. One calf was injured 30 min prior to and the other calf 2.5 h after administration of morphine. Hence, the calf injured prior to morphine administration was a model of postinjury treatment, and the calf injured after morphine administration, a model of pretraumatic treatment. The timing of injuries was identical on the morphine treatment and control days. The injuries induced decrease in heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds within the area of injury (area of primary hyperalgesia) as well as reduction of areas of allodynia for brush and pinprick surrounding the injury (area of secondary hyperalgesia). Both pre- and post-traumatic administration of EM increased heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds, and decreased by approximately 50% the areas of secondary hyperalgesia 2.5 h postinjury. The effects of morphine were naloxone (NAL)-reversible (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.). There was no significant difference between pre- and post-traumatic administration of morphine on the effect of either primary or secondary hyperalgesia. EM increased the heat pain detection threshold more within the injury than at a corresponding non-injured site. There was no significant difference in the effect of morphine on heat pain tolerance in injured and non-injured skin. Following NAL, the areas of secondary hyperalgesia expanded beyond control size. It is suggested that the major effect of EM on secondary hyperalgesia is inhibition of C fibre-mediated activity which maintains the altered response properties of central neurons responsible for secondary hyperalgesia. Possible mechanisms of action of NAL in enhancement of hyperalgesia are discussed.

Adult↗

Evidence for central summation of C and A delta nociceptive activity in man.

Using two different stimulators, we have induced activity in A delta and C afferents in order to investigate a possible summation of nociceptive activity from these two fiber types. We used nociceptive electrical stimulation to evoke activity in A delta fibers. High-intensity light from a xenon lamp, focused into a liquid light guide which was positioned on a spot painted black under the sole of the foot, resulted in a characteristic delayed burning sensation, indicating selective C-fiber activation. By varying the delay between radiant heat and electrical stimuli (0-3000 msec), sensations evoked by these stimuli were brought to coincide. When we elicited the electrical stimulation during on-going burning pain, corresponding to a delay of approximately 1 sec between the stimulations, we found a significantly higher nociceptive withdrawal reflex in tibialis anterior (P < 0.01) and a higher overall pain rating (P < 0.05). The existence of a summation mechanism at the spinal cord is the most likely explanation for our findings. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the nociceptive reflex may be modulated by on-going C-fiber activity.

Adult↗

Effect of short-term hyperglycemia per se on nociceptive and non-nociceptive thresholds.

Previous animal and human studies have indicated that nociceptive thresholds are decreased by acute hyperglycemia. The results of these studies may be challenged due to methodological problems. We therefore conducted a double-blind, controlled, cross-over study on the effect of acute hyperglycemia on nociceptive and non-nociceptive thresholds in 10 type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients (diabetes < 5 years) without symptoms or clinical signs of peripheral neuropathy. During an overnight fast, blood glucose concentration was normalized by refract insulin injections. Then, blood glucose was kept at 6 mmol/l for 3 h by an intravenous infusion of glucose and insulin. On one study day, blood glucose was kept at 6 mmol/l for a further 3 h and on another day, blood glucose was elevated to 12 mmol/l during 0.5 h by additional glucose infusion and kept at that level for 2.5 h. Sensory testing was carried out twice during the initial 3 h with euglycemia and 3 times during the following period with either hyper- or euglycemia. The test procedure included determination of pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds to heat (wrists) and pressure (fingers) as well as detection thresholds to warmth/cooling (wrist), vibration (finger), and mechanical (wrist) stimulation. The changes in neither nociceptive nor non-nociceptive thresholds showed any statistically significant differences between the 2 study days. The pressure pain detection and tolerance thresholds showed, however, minor decreases at each of the test days, probably due to cutaneous sensitization caused by the repeated measurements. Compared to baseline, the pressure pain thresholds decreased significantly on the day with hyperglycemia. None of the other thresholds showed such changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Quantitative sensory examination of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in man; dose-response effect of bupivacaine.

Time and dose-response functions of 4 concentrations of epidural bupivacaine (0.075, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5%; 20 ml) on somatosensory and motor functions were examined in 10 healthy volunteers. Every hour for 8 h the effect of epidural bupivacaine on perception of painful and non-painful stimuli was quantified with 12 psychophysical measures. In addition knee extension strength, reaction time and skin temperature were examined. The two lowest concentrations of bupivacaine induced hypoalgesia without impairment of motor function. Epidural bupivacaine produced differential blockade of non-painful somatosensory functions in the following order: warmth perception > cold perception > perception of electrical stimuli. Epidural bupivacaine induced more pronounced hypoalgesia for short-lasting than for prolonged stimuli. A modality-related blocking order was observed for prolonged painful stimuli: heat > mechanical > electrical. It is suggested that differential blockade of somatosensory functions is caused by differences both in conduction blockade of nerve fibres and in central integration of afferent nerve impulses.

Adult↗

Quantitative sensory examination of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in man: combination of morphine and bupivacaine.

The effect of epidural administration of a combination of low-dose morphine (2 mg) and bupivacaine (25 mg) on somatosensory and motor functions was examined in 13 healthy volunteers. The study design was a double-blind 4-way cross-over in which combined treatment was compared with either drug used alone or placebo. Every 2nd hour for 10 h effects on nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory functions were quantified with 12 psychophysical measures. In addition knee extension strength, reaction time and skin temperature were examined. Epidural bupivacaine had hypoalgesic effect in all nociceptive tests, whereas epidural morphine only demonstrated hypoalgesic properties in nociceptive test with prolonged stimuli. In comparison with bupivacaine alone the combination treatment had a lesser peak effect but a more prolonged hypoalgesic action. In comparison with morphine alone the combination treatment induced a faster onset and demonstrated a modest increase in hypoalgesic effect in a subset of the test, even beyond the duration of bupivacaine when administered alone. Motor function was not attenuated by any of the treatments. Mechanisms of interaction between morphine and bupivacaine as well as their possible clinical implications are discussed.

Adolescent↗

The effect of pre- versus postinjury infiltration with lidocaine on thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia after heat injury to the skin.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of pre- and postinjury infiltration with lidocaine on alterations in mechanical and thermal sensitivity after heat injury to the skin. In the first part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 7 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart in 8 healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, in order to investigate the effects of the injury on sensitivity in untreated skin. In the second part of the study, burn injuries (15 x 25 mm rectangular thermode, 50 degrees C, 6 min) were produced twice in each subject on the medial side of the left and right calves at least 24 h apart (n = 10). This was preceded by subcutaneous (s.c.) infiltration with 5-6 ml of 1% plain lidocaine (pre-injury block) on one day, and the same block was performed 35 min after injury (postinjury block) on the other day. Warm detection thresholds (WDT) and heat pain detection thresholds (HPDT) were determined within and outside the injury before and at regular intervals after injury. Areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were determined at regular intervals after injury. In the first part of the study, it was observed that both WDT and HPDT were decreased within but not outside the injury, and areas of hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush were found in- and outside the injury in all subjects. These findings were relatively constant throughout the study period and reproducible between the 2 days of examination. In the second part of the study, it was observed that pre-injury infiltration with lidocaine reduced hyperalgesia to pinprick and brush outside the injury more effectively than postinjury block, but only for the first 70 min after injury, while no significant difference was observed 100-190 min after injury. Likewise, there was no difference in thermal thresholds inside the injury between pre- and postinjury treatment at the end of the study period. It is concluded, that a shortlasting 'preemptive' infiltration with lidocaine may postpone but not prevent the occurrence of hyperalgesia outside a thermal injury.

Adult↗

Quantitative sensory examination during epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in man: effects of morphine.

In a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study the effects of epidural morphine (4 mg) on somatosensory functions were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers. Detection, pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds to thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli as well as magnitude rating of short-lasting stimuli of the same modalities were monitored before and for 10 h after epidural administration of 4 mg of morphine or saline. Epidural morphine induced a naloxone-reversible (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.) increase in pain detection threshold to heat and mechanical stimuli and in pain tolerance threshold to heat, mechanical and electrical stimuli. Morphine induced a more pronounced increase in the pain tolerance than in the pain detection threshold. Magnitude rating of short-lasting radiant heat (argon laser) stimuli were reduced by epidural morphine in comparison to placebo while there was no significant difference between the effects of morphine and placebo on magnitude rating of short-lasting mechanical and electrical stimuli. The warm detection threshold was increased (naloxone reversible) by morphine. Segmental distribution of pruritus was reported by 7 subjects following epidural morphine which was replaced by a short-lasting burning sensation following naloxone administration. Naloxone (0.1 mg/kg) preceeded by placebo did not change somatosensory functions. These results indicate that the somatosensory effect of epidural morphine is dependent on the types of afferent fibres activated as well as on the duration and intensity of the stimulus.

Adult↗

Quantitative sensory examination in human epidural anaesthesia and analgesia: effects of lidocaine.

To characterize the sensory effects of epidural lidocaine, 2 groups each of 10 human subjects received 25 ml of 2% lidocaine at the L1-L2/L2-L3 interspace (high lumbar group) or at the L3-L4/L4-L5 interspace (low lumbar group). Twelve quantitative sensory tests in the L5 and S1 dermatomes and leg extension strength were determined every 30 min for 3 h. Sensory and motor blockade were more pronounced in the low than in the high lumbar group. Sensory functions were blocked in the following order by epidural lidocaine: warm > cold > electrical stimuli. Perception of brief localized noxious stimuli was attenuated more than perception of noxious stimuli of longer duration and involving larger stimulus areas. It is suggested that both peripheral mechanisms (differential conduction blockade of afferent fibres) and central mechanisms (temporal and spatial summation) play a role in the sensory effects of epidural lidocaine.

Adult↗