Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jan Kiefer

Publications and source records attributed to Jan Kiefer.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Round window stimulation with an implantable hearing aid (Soundbridge) combined with autogenous reconstruction of the auricle - a new approach.

BACKGROUND: Congenital malformations of the auricle are often combined with atresia of the outer ear canal and malformations of the ossicles, representing aesthetic as well as functional deficits. Optimal treatment should therefore address both aspects equally. This report describes a new approach, combining the reconstruction of the auricle with implantation of an active middle ear hearing aid, stimulating the round window membrane. METHOD: A 33-year-old male patient, with bilateral ear microtia, fibrous atresia of the external ear canals and malformation of the ossicles due to Treacher Collins-Franceschetti syndrome was included in the study. In stage one, the cartilage framework of the new auricle, made of autogenous rib cartilage, was fabricated and implanted. During stage two, the auricle was elevated, a retro-auricular sulcus was formed and a Vibrant MED-EL Soundbridge device was implanted. The transducer was coupled to the round window membrane. RESULTS: Both functional and aesthetical results were favourable. Aided thresholds were between 15 and 30 dB in the frequency range of 0.75-6 kHz, monosyllabic word understanding at 65 dB SPL increased from 0 to 80%. DISCUSSION: Combining aesthetic and functional rehabilitation, autogenous reconstruction of a new auricle together with the implantation of an active middle ear hearing aid, coupled to the round window membrane, is a promising new approach.

Adult↗

Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term ipsilateral hearing preservation in patients who underwent cochlear implantation for the combined electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center. Twenty-three subjects were implanted with the MED-EL C40+ standard or C40+ medium electrode using an atraumatic surgical protocol via an anterior-inferior cochleostomy approach. The desired insertion depth was 18-24 mm or 360 degrees. All patients showed significant low-frequency hearing prior to surgery and monosyllabic word scores did not exceed 40% in the best aided condition. Pure-tone audiometry was performed prior to implantation and at distinct intervals after surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients (39.1%) showed complete pure-tone audiometric hearing preservation (0-10 dB) over an average of 29 months. Seven subjects (30.4%) showed partial preservation of residual hearing (hearing loss 15-40 dB) until an average of 25 months. Delayed loss of residual hearing was observed in 5 cases (21.7%) and 2 patients (8.6%) completely lost residual hearing during or immediately after surgery. Freiburger Monosyllabic word understanding scores in a group of patients with complete hearing preservation increased from 13.1% preoperatively to 75% in the electric acoustic stimulation condition. CONCLUSION: This study documents that complete and partial preservation of ipsilateral hearing after cochlear implantation can be achieved in about 70% of cases over an average period of 27.25 months when using 360 degrees electrode insertions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.

BACKGROUND: In subjects with remaining low frequency hearing, combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapeutic perspective. Intracochlear introduction of a cochlear implant electrode, however, may alter the biomechanical properties of the inner ear and thus affect perception of acoustic stimuli. STUDY DESIGN: Based on histological observations of morphologic changes after cochlear implantation in cadaveric and post mortem studies the effects of basilar membrane (BM) stiffening in the ascending basal and middle turns of the cochlea due to close contact of the BM with the electrode were simulated in a 3D-computational finite element model of the inner ear. To verify our simulated results, pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiograms of 13 subjects with substantial residual hearing, who underwent cochlear implantation, were evaluated. RESULTS: In the scenario of partial BM-fixation, acoustic energy of middle (2 kHz) and high (6 kHz) frequency was focused basally and apically to the fixed section, increasing BM displacement amplitudes up to 6 dB at a stimulation level of 94 dB (SPL). Lower frequencies were not affected by fixation in the basal and middle turn of the cochlea. In implanted subjects, a small but significant decrease of thresholds was observed at 1.5 kHz, a place in tonotopy adjacent to the tip region of the implanted electrode. CONCLUSION: Our model suggests that stiffening of the basilar membrane adjacent to an implanted electrode into the basal and middle cochlear turn did not affect BM movement in the low frequency area. Focussing of acoustic energy may increase perception in regions adjacent to the fixed section. Observations in implanted subjects were concordant with our model predictions. High frequencies, however, should not be amplified in patients using EAS to avoid disturbances in discrimination due to tonotopically incorrect frequency representation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of cochlear implant (CI) insertion depth and surgical technique on intracochlear trauma. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Twenty-one fresh human temporal bones were implanted with CI electrodes and underwent histologic processing and evaluation. Specimens were grouped into 3 categories: 1) soft implantation technique and standard electrode; 2) soft implantation technique and flexible prototype array; 3) forceful implantations and standard electrode. Based on the grading system (1 to 4), 2 numeric values were calculated indicating the overall severity of cochlear damage (trauma indices). RESULTS: Mean trauma index values were 13.8, 36.3, and 59.2 for group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences in cochlear trauma (trauma index) were nonsignificant between specimens in groups 1 and 2 but were significant between groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study gives evidence that intracochlear trauma increases with deep insertions. Thus, in cases where cochlear integrity might be important, limited insertions should be achieved.

Alloys↗

Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?

CONCLUSIONS: Except for basal cochlear traumatization, all specimens implanted into scala tympani showed atraumatic insertion properties and good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Cochleostomy preparation and placement can have a significant impact on levels of basal cochlear trauma. OBJECTIVE: In the past, perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes increased the risk for intracochlear traumatization when compared to free-fitting arrays. Recently, however, clinical evidence for atraumatic perimodiolar implantations with preservation of residual hearing has been described. The aim of this paper was to histologically evaluate a perimodiolar cochlear implant array for its insertion properties in cadaver human temporal bones. Surgical and electrode factors, as well as preparation artifacts influencing intracochlear trauma, were considered in the evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen human temporal bones were harvested up to 24 hours post mortem and implanted immediately with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant electrode array. Implantations were either performed using a regular caudal approach cochleostomy or through the round window membrane. After implantation, all bones underwent special histological processing, which allowed sectioning of undecalcified bone. Insertion properties were evaluated according to a grading system. RESULTS: Fourteen specimens were implanted into scala tympani and only two exhibited basal trauma attributable to electrode insertion characteristics. Two bones were implanted into scala vestibuli after causing trauma in the region of the cochleostomy. Insertion depths ranged from 180 degrees to 400 degrees. All bones showed good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Basal trauma due to surgical issues and histological artifacts was present in 10 of 16 bones.

Auditory Threshold↗

The large vestibular aqueduct--case report and review of the literature.

Patients with a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) suffer from a loss of hearing in childhood at an early onset. An acute loss of hearing can be precipitated by minor head trauma. Until now there seems to be no sufficient therapy for stopping the progression of a loss of hearing. It has been shown that a cochlear implantation is a worthwhile procedure if the patient is almost deaf. We report the case of a patient with a bilateral LVA. A loss of hearing was confirmed at the age of 16 months. Exposure to loud noise triggered an acute progression of the hearing loss. At the age of 18 years, LVA was confirmed radiologically, revealing an enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac in MRI scans and an enlarged vestibular aqueduct in the CT scan. We successfully performed a cochlear implant (MED-EL, Combi 40+ flex). Proceeding from this case report, the paper reviews the literature on LVA.

Adolescent↗

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapy for patients with severe to profound high- and mid-frequency hearing loss but remaining low-frequency hearing. In a prospective study, 13 patients with low-frequency hearing of better than 60 dB below 1 kHz were implanted with a MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Pure tone thresholds as well as monosyllabic word scores and Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences in quiet and in noise were measured with hearing aids, cochlear implant alone and in the combined stimulation mode (EAS) in the same ear. Hearing could be partially preserved in 11 out of the 13 patients. All patients scored significantly higher with cochlear implant alone than with hearing aids. Seven patients scored higher in the EAS mode than with cochlear implant alone for sentences in noise, 4 remained unchanged, and 2 could not use EAS. Synergistic effects of EAS were most prominent for hearing in noise with increases of up to 72% as compared to cochlear implant alone.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: As results with cochlear implants have continued to improve, patients with some remaining cochlear function have become eligible for cochlear implantation. Thus, preservation of acoustic hearing after implantation has gained importance. Hearing preservation can be considered a benchmark for atraumatic implantation preventing neural degeneration from loss of residual hair cells or subsequent to local trauma. In this prospective study, the possibility of preserving low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation using a modified surgical technique has been explored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study design, 14 subjects with considerable low-frequency hearing of 20-60 dB in the frequency range 125-500 Hz but with unsatisfactory speech understanding with hearing aids of < 35% monosyllabic word understanding were implanted with a MED-EL COMBI-40+ cochlear implant. The insertion depth was intentionally limited to 19-24 mm to prevent damage to low-frequency regions of the cochlea. Pre- and postoperative pure-tone thresholds were measured. RESULTS: Hearing was conserved within 0-10 dB in 9/14 subjects and within 11-20 dB in 3/14; in 2/14 subjects hearing was completely lost in the implanted ear. Thus hearing could at least partially be conserved in 12/14 subjects (86%). Median threshold values decreased by 10, 15, 17.5 and 5 dB at 125, 250, 500 and 1000 Hz, respectively. Even high levels of hearing, e.g. 30 dB at 500 Hz, could be maintained after implantation in some subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports successful conservation of hearing after cochlear implantation using a modified surgical technique. Even high levels of hearing could be maintained, showing that implantation of an intracochlear electrode can be performed atraumatically with preservation of functional structures.

Adult↗

Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possibility of preservation of low-frequency hearing in atraumatic cochlear implant electrode insertion procedures for combined, ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients were implanted with a MED EL C40+ cochlear implant using an atraumatic electrode insertion technique to preserve residual low-frequency hearing. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds were measured pre- and postoperatively to evaluate the degree of preserved hearing. Speech discrimination tests in quiet and with background noise were performed in a patient with successful hearing preservation. RESULTS: Using the atraumatic electrode insertion procedure with an insertion depth of 360 degrees (18-24 mm), hearing preservation could be achieved in 18/21 patients (85.7%). Three patients (14.3%) lost their residual low-frequency hearing after the implantation. Residual hearing was preserved completely in 13 patients (61.9%) and partial hearing preservation was possible in 5 (23.8%). Preliminary speech discrimination tests showed a dramatic benefit for the combined electric and acoustic stimulation mode compared to cochlear implantation alone. CONCLUSION: Preservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation is possible in patients implanted because of profound high-frequency deafness. With the development of new, more atraumatic electrode designs, preservation of residual hearing should be further improved.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cochlear implant trauma to intracochlear structures when inserting the electrode via the round window membrane. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight fresh human temporal bones were evaluated histologically after insertion using two types of cochlear implant array. Bones underwent a special fixation and embedding procedure that allowed sectioning of undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. Insertions depths were evaluated radiologically and histologically. RESULTS: All arrays were found in the scala tympani of the cochlea. Basal trauma could be avoided in all but one specimen. The mean depth of insertion was 382.5 degrees. Apically, only one implanted bone showed cochlear trauma exceeding lifting of the basilar membrane. CONCLUSION: Insertions through the round window membrane were shown to be atraumatic, even in basal cochlear regions. This route of insertion might be very effective for combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.

Cochlea↗

Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the intracochlear position and the extent of trauma to cochlear structures using a new prototype electrode carrier (Flex EAS). Special emphasis was placed on the practicality for combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. STUDY DESIGN: Human temporal bones were evaluated histologically after insertion of the electrodes, and insertion forces were measured in an acrylic model of the scala tympani. METHODS: 1) Insertion forces with the regular C40+ array and the new electrode prototype were measured in an acrylic model of the scala tympani. 2) Ten human temporal bones were implanted using the same surgical procedure as in vivo. All bones underwent fixation methylmethacrylate embedding to allow cutting of the undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. In addition, radiography of the implanted devices was performed and correlated to histologic results. Electrode positions and trauma to cochlear structures were then evaluated histologically. RESULTS: All insertions of the new electrode array were performed in the scala tympani of the cochlea. All insertions were atraumatic and covered one cochlear turn. The only effect on cochlear structures that could be observed was a slight lifting of the basilar membrane in the middle turn limited to the tip of the electrode. In three bones, basal trauma, which resulted from the cochleostomy itself, could be observed as well. All neural structures remained intact. CONCLUSIONS: The new electrode prototype provides very good mechanical properties for safe and atraumatic implantation. All criteria for the use in hearing-preservation cochlear implantation for electric and acoustic stimulation were fulfilled. Surgical measures to prevent basal trauma appear to be very important.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Application of carbon dioxide and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers in inner ear surgery: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery of the inner ear requires atraumatic techniques to preserve the sensory structures of the inner ear. With modern laser technology, surgery can be performed without mechanical contact, reducing the risk of direct mechanical trauma. However, energy transfer by laser light has the potential to induce damage by heating, pressure waves, or direct irradiation, depending on the properties of the laser and parameters of application. HYPOTHESIS: The application of laser systems in inner ear surgery may have an advantage over traditional techniques; the carbon dioxide laser in continuous mode with an automated scanning procedure and the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser were compared with a mechanical technique, using a diamond drill. METHODS: A cochleostomy in the basal cochlear turn of guinea pigs was created. Thresholds in response to frequency-specific stimuli and clicks were established by recording compound action potentials, both before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The best results in terms of preservation of cochlear function were obtained with the diamond drill. However, a single ear had a complete loss after fracture of the cochlear wall. Mean threshold shifts observed with the carbon dioxide laser were slightly greater, showing mild high-frequency losses, although differences to the group of drilling were not statistically significant. Results with the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser showed significantly higher degrees of hearing loss than the other two groups, predominantly in the high-frequency region. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical opening of the inner ear using a microdrill can be performed with minimal hearing loss; however, it carries the risk of direct trauma to the inner ear. The carbon dioxide laser with a new scanning technology as a noncontact procedure is shown to be effective and safe. It can be regarded as a useful tool in inner ear surgery. The erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser has a greater potential to cause damage.

Aluminum↗

Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation.

The aim of this report was to examine basal trauma in implanted human temporal bones and discuss modified approaches to the basal cochlear turn to avoid destruction of basal cochlear structures. Thirty-three human temporal bones were implanted with four different cochlear implant electrode arrays manufactured by MED-EL using either a caudal approach cochleostomy or round window membrane insertions. All specimens were processed with a special histological technique that allows sectioning of undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. All bones were evaluated histologically in terms of basal cochlear trauma. Two pathomechanisms of basal trauma could be distinguished and were evaluated separately, buckling of the basal end of the array and trauma by drilling. Using the caudal approach cochleostomy, the total percentage of destructive basal trauma was 48% compared to less than 15% when performing round window membrane insertions. Although it is still unclear whether basal cochlear trauma influences apical cochlear function or not, adapted surgical procedures and no forceful insertion maneuvers should be used when performing cochlear implantations with hearing preservation.

Cochlea↗

Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.

The history of cochlear implants is marked by large improvements in performance, especially over the past two decades and especially due to the development of ever-better processing strategies. Although the progress to date has been substantial, present devices still do not restore normal speech reception, even for top performers and particularly for listening to speech in competition with noise or other talkers. In addition, a wide range of outcomes persists, with some patients receiving little benefit using the same devices that support high levels of speech reception for others. The purpose of this review is to describe some likely possibilities for further improvement, including (a) combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system for patients with significant residual hearing, (b) use of bilateral implants, (c) a closer replication with implants of the processing steps in the normal cochlea, and (d) applications of knowledge about factors that are correlated with outcomes to help patients presently at the low end of the performance scale.

Acoustic Stimulation↗