Immediate early genes after pulsed radiofrequency treatment: neurobiology in need of clinical trials.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to James P Rathmell.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intrathecal opioids are widely used as useful adjuncts in the treatment of acute and chronic pain, and a number of non-opioid drugs show promise as analgesic drugs with spinal selectivity. In this review we examine the historical development and current use of intrathecal opioids and other drugs that show promise for treating pain in the perioperative period. The pharmacology and clinical use of intrathecal morphine and other opioids is reviewed in detail, including dosing guidelines for specific surgical procedures and the incidence and treatment of side effects associated with these drugs. Available data on the use of non-opioid drugs that have been tested intrathecally for use as analgesics are also reviewed. Evidence-based guidelines for dosing of intrathecal drugs for specific surgical procedures and for the treatment of the most common side effects associated with these drugs are presented.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intraspinal drug infusion using fully implantable pump and catheter systems is a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with chronic pain. The options for this approach are increasing, as drugs that are commercially available for systemic administration are adapted to this use and other drugs that are in development specifically for intraspinal administration become available. In 2000 a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference was organized to evaluate the existing literature and develop guidelines for drug selection. The major outcome of this effort, an algorithm for drug selection, was based on the best available evidence at the time. Rapid changes have occurred in the science and practice of intraspinal infusion and a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003 was organized to pursue the following goals: 1) to review the literature on intraspinal drug infusion since 1999, 2) to revise the 2000 drug-selection algorithm, 3) to develop guidelines for optimizing drug dosage and concentration, 4) to create a process for documenting minimum evidence supporting the use of a drug for intraspinal infusion, and 5) to clarify issues pertaining to compounding of drugs. Based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, consensus recommendations were developed in all these areas. The panel's conclusions may provide a foundation for clinical practice and a rational basis for new research.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: In this series, we examined analgesia and side effects of intrathecal morphine sulfate (ITMS) after hip and knee arthroplasty over a dose range of 0.0-0.3 mg. Eighty patients undergoing hip (n = 40) or knee (n = 40) arthroplasty were randomized to receive ITMS (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. Morphine use, pain relief, and side effects were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and linear regression. After hip arthroplasty, morphine use was less in patients receiving 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg of ITMS than in control patients (P < 0.05). After knee arthroplasty, ITMS did not reduce postoperative morphine requirements. Nausea and vomiting and the incidence of oxygen saturation <93% were similar in all groups. Pruritus was more common after ITMS. Patients receiving 0.2 or 0.3 mg of ITMS were more satisfied with their pain control than those receiving 0.0 or 0.1 mg after both hip and knee arthroplasty. Analgesic needs are greater after knee arthroplasty than after hip arthroplasty. We conclude that combining small-dose (0.2 mg) ITMS with PCA morphine provides good to excellent pain control in most patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty. However, PCA morphine use was reduced by the addition of ITMS only after hip arthroplasty. IMPLICATIONS: This series examined the need for supplemental analgesics, the quality of analgesia, and the incidence of side effects with intrathecal morphine sulfate (ITMS) for analgesia after hip and knee arthroplasty. Analgesic needs are greater after knee arthroplasty than hip arthroplasty. Combining small-dose (0.2 mg) ITMS with standard doses of PCA morphine provided good to excellent pain control in most patients and reduced patient-controlled analgesia morphine use after hip, but not knee, arthroplasty.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction is an important cause of mechanical low-back pain. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation has been proposed as a long-lasting treatment for pain in patients with SI dysfunction who report temporary pain relief with local-anesthetic injection into the joint. No data are available to guide the technical aspects of bipolar radiofrequency lesion creation. This study documents the optimal spacing of cannulae and time required to produce bipolar lesions by use of radiofrequency technology. METHODS: Two radiofrequency cannulae were secured in a parallel position 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm apart and submerged in egg white for lesion production in a medium that would allow visualization of the size and shape of the lesions as they were created. Temperatures of the probes were raised from 40 degrees C to 90 degrees C at a constant rate and were held at 90 degrees C for 190 seconds. The progress of lesion formation was photographed every 10 seconds, and the resultant surface area of the lesions was measured from the digital images. RESULTS: Contiguous strip lesions were produced when the cannulae were spaced 6 mm or less apart; unipolar lesions around each cannula resulted if they were spaced more than 6 mm apart. Ninety percent of the final lesion area was reached by 120 seconds, and the final lesion size was reached by 150 seconds, regardless of spacing. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radiofrequency treatment creates continuous "strip" lesions proportional in size to the distance between the probes when the distance between cannulae is 6 mm or less. Spacing the cannulae 4 to 6 mm apart and treating at 90 degrees C for 120 to 150 seconds maximizes the surface area of the lesion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Recent articles have detailed the adverse events associated with transforaminal steroid injections into the radicular arteries. Guidelines on strict transforaminal epidural techniques have been described to limit complications. There remains limited information regarding the cervical level of entry, location within the intervertebral foramina, and prevalence of the radicular arteries within the population. METHODS: With the aid of premortem angiography and postmortem latex-injected vasculature, a single detailed cadaveric dissection was performed to elucidate the specific anatomic location of the radicular arteries within the intervertebral foramina and the anastomoses of the arteries to the anterior spinal artery. RESULTS: Five radicular arteries (C5, C6, two at C7, C8) were traced entering the foramina either anteriorly or posteriorly to supply the anterior and posterior spinal arteries. Radicular arteries received blood supply from either the deep cervical (C8) or vertebral arteries. The C8 radicular artery entered the lateral aspect of the foramen and penetrated the dural sleeve within the inferior portion of the foramen, directly inferior to the exiting spinal nerve, to supply the anterior spinal artery. This artery was of a large enough caliber to be entered by a 22-gauge needle. CONCLUSIONS: A larger population is necessary to characterize the range of anatomic variations in arterial supply within the foramina. Available studies support the current technique of fluoroscopic needle insertion. Yet, there is wide anatomic variation in the origin and location of these vessels, and even with strict adherence to technique, it is feasible that a properly placed needle could penetrate a radicular artery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Acute Pain Summit 2005 was convened to critically examine the perceptions of physicians about current methods used to control postoperative pain and to compare those perceptions with the available scientific evidence. Clinicians with expertise in treatment of postsurgical pain were asked to evaluate 10 practice-based statements. The statements were written to reflect areas within the field of acute-pain management, where significant questions remain regarding everyday practice. Each statement made a specific claim about the usefulness of a specific therapy (eg, PCA or epidural analgesia) or the use of pain-control modalities in specific patient populations (eg, epidural analgesia after colon resection). Members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) were asked, via a Web-based survey, to rate their degree of agreement with each of the 10 statements; 22.8% (n = 632) of members responded. In preparation for the pain summit, a panel member independently conducted a literature search and summarized the available evidence relevant to each statement. Summit participants convened in December 2005. The assigned panel member presented the available evidence, and workshop participants then assigned a category for the level of evidence and recommendation for each statement. All participants then voted about each statement by use of the same accept/reject scale used earlier by ASRA members. This manuscript details those opinions and presents a critical analysis of the existing evidence supporting new and emerging techniques used to control postsurgical pain.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.