Biomedical subjects

James J Perumpillichira

Publications and source records attributed to James J Perumpillichira.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the homogeneity, adequacy, and patient acceptance of nonionic iodine-based regimens with those of a barium-based regimen for computed tomographic (CT) colonography with electronic subtraction cleansing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, 68 subjects (41 men (60%) men, 27 (40%) women; mean age, 60 years +/- 6 [standard deviation]) with average or moderate risk factors for development of colorectal carcinoma were recruited and placed into three study groups. Group 1 (n = 25) ingested 150-mL aliquots of 2% barium sulfate suspension with meals and snacks for 48 hours prior to imaging, without other diet modification or a cathartic. Group 2 (n = 21) ingested 10-mL aliquots of nonionic iodinated contrast material (iopromide) with a concentration of 300 mg per milliliter with meals and snacks for 2 days before imaging, without diet modification or a cathartic. Group 3 (n = 22) ingested nonionic iodinated contrast material (iohexol) with a concentration of 300 mg per milliliter with meals and snacks for 2 days before imaging and ingested 34 g of magnesium citrate the evening prior to imaging. CT colonography was also performed on 10 control subjects who ingested polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution prior to imaging. Subjective and numerical measures of bowel preparation quality, homogeneity, and patient comfort among the noncathartic and cathartic cohorts were compared with nonparametric analysis of variance, the Fisher exact test, and the F test, as appropriate. The study was HIPAA compliant. RESULTS: Study subjects who received tagging preparations reported significantly improved discomfort scores when compared with those of the control subjects (P < .05, each comparison). There was no significant difference in discomfort scores among groups 1, 2, and 3. For each reader, scores of subtracted image readability were highest for group 3. Dichotomized rates of preparation "success" were also greatest for group 3. CONCLUSION: In this series, the patient discomfort scores were significantly improved with tagging preparations for CT colonography. Nonionic iodinated contrast material in conjunction with a hyperosmotic laxative (magnesium citrate) was associated with the best subjective and numerical indices of readability.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Computer-aided detection for virtual colonoscopy.

Colon cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the developed countries. Most colon cancers can be prevented if precursor colon polyps are detected and removed. Virtual colonoscopy, or CT colonography, has shown promise to be the future screening tool for polyp detection, with a number of studies performed at academic institutions showing high sensitivity and specificity. Two main factors limiting CT colonography in general use are its excessive interpretation time and the variable sensitivity among readers. This article discusses the potential of computer-aided detection to address these problems. We also review the current state of research in this field and the future roles and challenges of CAD for CT colonography.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of various bowel contrast material concentrations and subtraction software on size measurements of well-defined polyp lesions in a colon phantom at CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Repeated scanning and a precise reference standard required the use of a colon phantom in which 21 polyps were randomly distributed. Two readers who had each reviewed computed tomographic (CT) colonographic images from more than 100 cases evaluated polyp size on images obtained when the phantom was partially filled with varying concentrations of contrast material, scanned by using CT colonography, and subjected to electronic subtraction cleansing. The single largest dimension was recorded for each reader for a randomized series of polyps. These measurements were compared with a reference standard that was based on a combination of the manufacturer's polyp size specifications and the subsequent verification of these sizes by an independent consensus panel. Six weeks after initial observations, readers evaluated images of the phantom scanned without the presence of contrast material. Polyp size estimations for the two readers for each series were compared with the reference standard to obtain a mean absolute measurement error for each reader for each series. Data for each reader were compared by using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test. A pair-wise comparison of the experimental and control series was then performed by using the Dunn post hoc test. RESULTS: Contrast material dilutions resulting in an average attenuation of less than 500 HU resulted in complete subtraction and the absence of streak artifacts. There was no statistically significant difference between the average measurement error for contrast attenuations between 300 and 500 HU when compared with that of control. Streak artifact was noticeable for the highest dilution (mean, 840 HU). No statistically significant differences were observed for series in which cleansing software was used in the absence of bowel contrast material. CONCLUSION: The combination of electronic cleansing and bowel contrast enhancement in the range of 300-500 HU results in no substantial change in readers' estimations of polyp size at CT colonography.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Techniques, clinical applications and limitations of 3D reconstruction in CT of the abdomen.

Enhanced z-axis coverage with thin overlapping slices in breath-hold acquisitions with multidetector CT (MDCT) has considerably enhanced the quality of multiplanar 3D reconstruction. This pictorial essay describes the improvements in 3D reconstruction and technical aspects of 3D reconstruction and rendering techniques available for abdominal imaging. Clinical applications of 3D imaging in abdomen including liver, pancreaticobiliary system, urinary and gastrointestinal tracts and imaging before and after transplantation are discussed. In addition, this article briefly discusses the disadvantages of thin-slice acquisitions including increasing numbers of transverse images, which must be reviewed by the radiologist.

Adult↗